WinApps needs a Windows RDP server to work. Most of the functionality doesn't care where that Windows RDP server is actually running as long as its FreeRDP client can connect to it. The container or libvirt VM options are just ways to accomplish that via virtualization.

I imagine the container part makes it easier to automate QEMU virtualization using bash scripting without worrying about distribution specific differences in the environment. These kinds of scripts become fairly ossified to their environment. Making them run consistently on different Linux distributions is its own adventure unrelated to installing and running Windows, so the containerization eliminates the need for a lot more bash scripting to account for those differences.

The container's bash scripts download the Windows installer ISOs and run them in an unattended mode inside a QEMU VM. The unattended installation is configured to skip activation:

- https://github.com/dockur/windows/blob/c7aac1edcf37a69ff730d...

- https://github.com/dockur/windows/blob/c7aac1edcf37a69ff730d...

- https://github.com/dockur/windows/blob/c7aac1edcf37a69ff730d...

Once the container is running, WinApps configures RDP via some scripts and registry settings exposed into the container via a volume so the container's scripts can copy and run them in the Windows VM:

- https://github.com/winapps-org/winapps/blob/b4766336903d0cbe...

- https://github.com/winapps-org/winapps/blob/main/oem/RDPApps...

You can do it all yourself too with your own libvirt VM, but it's just more involved:

- https://github.com/winapps-org/winapps/blob/main/docs/libvir...

I haven't seen any of this before, but I think it's a pretty clever use of scripting and containers on top of some fairly mature but hard to use pieces of software.

However, people can also adapt pretty quickly.

Those grocery shopping "optimization" skills are making a big come back (and have been since Covid). There are plenty of YouTube and TikTok videos popularizing how to get more out of their grocery hauls.

Lots of people are also learning how to budget, how to invest, etc. and sharing their excitement about it too. For some folks, they finally learn this stuff in their 40s and 50s, but there are also a lot of young adults learning these skills thanks to the Internet.

So I also have hope.

I just don't think the lack of basic math and budgeting skills displayed by average consumers are a problem so much as a symptom.

Probably a better example is figuring out the cost of a loan. Just multiply the amortized monthly payment by the term and compare that to the loan amount. If the difference makes you balk, then go ahead and walk.

How many people even realize that loan interest is a significant cost and would bother to do that? Or know how to do that? Most people just try to minimize monthly payments to something they can bear and sign the paperwork.

Math gives you the ability to leverage the very structure and relationships of pure abstraction. It's quite the super power.

None of the specific things you learn studying math will be nearly as useful as the ability to think mathematically.

A lot of editing tools and processes automatically converting `--` to `—`, so folks editing markdown or using a Word processor might get the emdash automatically. Similar things are often done for matching double quotes. I wouldn't be surprised if quite a few WYSIWYG CMS systems do this conversion too.

There are also a lot of input methods that make it trivial to write special characters.

Apple famously uses the Alt/Option key to make inputting a lot of special characters simple. Look at any place that does a lot of writing and publishing, and you're bound to see a lot of Macs.

On Windows, you can memorize and input code points pretty easily as well if you have a number pad. Just hold Alt and punch in the 4-digit character code.

I hop platforms a lot, so I commonly use digraphs with Ctrl+K in VIM, or TeX input in Emacs to insert unicode characters. I'll also use `Ctrl+x 8 ` to insert characters by name in Emacs when I need to search for something specific.

My $200 1500VA/1000W CyperPower UPS could handle a short one or two hour storm, but storms can last for 10+ hours here during the wet season. One long power outage could cost me a lot more than $1000 in basement damages (my basement is finished).

A comparable all-in-one product to this pila battery would also be around $1000: https://us.ecoflow.com/products/delta-2-max-portable-power-s...

You can easily cut that in half shopping for an inverter and battery separately:

$240 for an inverter: https://www.homedepot.com/p/VEVOR-2500-Watt-3-4-HP-Sump-Pump...

$200 for a battery: https://www.homedepot.com/p/Basement-Watchdog-Maintenance-Fr...

But a lead acid battery might last 5 years where the pila battery is designed for 10+ years, so you're looking at $400 total on batteries. That quickly gets close to the $1000 for one pila battery.

I want to believe $100 is all you need, but to me the math with the numbers that I've seen suggests $1000 is not unreasonable for something like this.

https://docs.python.org/dev/howto/sockets.html#socket-howto

It gets overlooked because most folks only check the Tutorial and the Standard Library sections.

Now I have to worry about my laptop randomly overheating itself in my backpack and even catching fire.

See page 9 of the datasheet here:

https://ftdichip.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/DS_FT232H.pd...

The async and sync bitbang columns denote the GPIO pins as D0-D7 and show them assigned to the 8 ADBUS pins that are provided on the breakout board.

Assuming the udev rules are set up in Linux, you can simply install pyftdi, open the device, and start using the ADBUS pins as GPIO pins:

https://eblot.github.io/pyftdi/gpio.html#setting-gpio-pin-st...

If you're using libftdi, you want to call ftdi_set_bitmode with the BITMODE_BITBANG enum value for the mode:

https://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi/documentation...

Then the ftdi_read_data and ftdi_write_data functions can be used to read or write to the ADBUS pins:

https://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi/documentation...

https://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi/documentation...

You can then build a nice, simple high level GPIO interface over that if you want.

http://developer.intra2net.com/git/?p=libftdi;a=blob;f=examp...

It's dead simple to also use these FTDI devices with Python:

https://eblot.github.io/pyftdi/api/index.html

https://www.adafruit.com/product/2264

https://ftdichip.com/products/ft2232h-mini-module/

Bit banging on a modern OS subjects you to a lot of jitter though. It's not like using a parallel port in DOS where you just have to worry about interrupts. The preemptive scheduler can really mess up your timing.

That said, the FT232H, FT2232H, and FT4232H have an FTDI Multi-Protocol Synchronous Serial Engine (MPSSE) cores that you can program to protocols like SPI and I2C where the high speed part doesn't require any smart logic to handle. It's a bit of a special skill though (you send MPSSE specific command bytes over the USB interface into the chip's command buffer and tell it to execute them).

If you need more high speed smarts, it's also convenient to use a Raspberry Pi Pico with MicroPython or CircuitPython with Programmable I/O (Pio) with an interactive session:

https://www.raspberrypi.com/news/what-is-pio/

https://docs.micropython.org/en/latest/rp2/quickref.html#pro...

But yeah, beyond that, you're better off using an Arduino or something and doing it all on the microcontroller.

On the plus side, all of these things are relatively cheap and easy to obtain.

I never owned a computer in the 90s, but my impression was that Cygnus[1] did a lot of work porting GCC and improving it for use in a variety of platforms, including embedded targets. They arguably helped pull GCC into mainstream usage, to the point of almost permanently forking it [2].

Those first 20 years of GCC development were prerequisites for something like Arduino to emerge in the mid-2000s. I'm just not sure we have the equivalent of GCC yet when it comes to synthesis tools.

When it appears, it might be a good opportunity to create a consulting company and drive it forward while also making some money. The key pitch would be improving your ability to maintain and share designs across targets while not having to pay recurring licenses on your tools.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cygnus_Solutions

[2]: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/History

https://pbskids.org/games

If your kids watch any PBS shows them they'll recognize the characters.

The activities were fun enough for our twins to learn how to use computer mice at age 3.

Tux Paint is also really fun for young kids and a good way to learn mouse usage:

https://tuxpaint.org/

Just thought I'd share in case you ever want to reconsider the dream car thing. You never know until you try and you can always bring car seats and test fit.

To your original point though, most of the time we use my wife's Honda Pilot because of the extra space for errands, sports gear, and luggage (and also because my wife doesn't want to drive stick in Northern Virginia traffic).

Day one of my first studio class, we did sketches of the person next to us and the instructor helped critique us. We learned to critique each other over time and with careful guidance.

That is to say, an instructor disseminates organized knowledge to the student. The student may be asked to communicate that knowledge back to prove mastery, but there's not as much emphasis on students giving each other critical feedback. Even when there is, it usually has a minor impact on your academic progress or grades.

As such, there's no incentive to learn how to give good feedback or make use of peer feedback.

Art school tends to be unique in that it cannot be taught that way. You spend years giving and receiving daily critiques and incorporating them into your growth.

The commonly accepted peer review processes we use in today's software engineering field involve giving and receiving feedback on your peers' work at a frequency that the vast majority of people simply have never experienced before.

Few people are naturally good at it, and few companies invest time into training anyone on how to do it well.