Not really, there are any number of reasons why they might do that.

In my own personal writing, sometimes I run it through LLMs to give grammar or writing suggestions.

2. Attacker asks the LLM for the opening sentences of the book, it goes into the generated responses database.

3. Later, a malicious user shows that the first few sentences of the authors book are identical to a previously generated response.

That way lies madness.

If the govt could do that, they could arrest anyone, anytime simply by making whatever they did yesterday retroactively illegal.

That seems a pretty high impact decision we want all the members of our society to be making on a regular basis.

Seems like it’s even easier, just join the meeting via browser.

I’m not familiar with a way to enforce this type of restriction in the browser.

It’s basically your apartment building example (esp. something like the STEM dorms)

When this stuff breaks in the hours leading up to a homework assignment being due, it’s going to discourage the next generation of engineers from using it.

If you want to go the local hobby store and play a game, most other people are playing Warhammer, that’s what you play too.

You might prefer Bolt Action, but if nobody else in town has a Bolt Action army, it’s an uphill climb.

I recently attended a big Wargaming convention. While all sorts of games were present and being played, 40K has orders of magnitude more people playing it.

Let’s say I invest $250k with you. From my research it appears the SIPC premiums on that amount would be more than $12/year.

How does that work?

I could see major (but different) issues with both scenarios.

What it would do is allow Elon’s feed to show everyone, and not have holes in it from people who have blocked him.

If an Nvidia driver had bricked the machines, would that be MS fault or Nvidia fault?

Is the argument that it was MS responsibility to bake something like this in at the OS level? And if they did it would be more robust?

I’m not sure I agree. MS has already gotten in trouble for monopolistic practices before, so from a legal standpoint, I’m not sure that’s the best course of action.

MS can’t prevent a software vendor from breaking the machine.