1. Make a website 2. Website has trusted code 3. Code update adds a virus

How do your suggestions fix those? Not trying to be dismissive I work on zero trust security perhaps I'm missing something crypto has to offer here?

Didn't realize my point was so philisophical lol

I was thinking of clear cases like true pychopaths on certain emotions.

Some humans lack certain emotions, them telling you something, and doing something doesn't really matter if they "felt" that emotion?

Human driving into work? Heating/cooling?

Wonder why big AI hasn't sold it as an enviromental SAVING technology.

A: you made this as a free gift to anyone including openai B: you made this to profit yourself in some way

The argument he makes is if you did the second one don't do opensource?

It does kill a ton of opensource companies though and truth is that model of operating now is not going to work in this new age.

Also is sad because it means the whole system will collapse. The processes that made him famous can no longer be followed. Your open source code will be used by countless people and they will never know your name.

It's not called a distruptive tech for nothing. Can't un opensource all that code without lobotomizing every AI model.

Very dangerous if you think about it that the product itself is the raw building block for itself.

Openai spends 1B$ on their model, releases it and instantly it gets scrapped by a million bots to build some country or company their own model.

Some early testing I found that injecting a "seed" only somewhat helped. I would inject a sentance of random characters to generate output.

It did actually imrpove its ability to make unique content but it wasn't great.

It would be cool to formaile the test for something like password generation.

It's like trying to make fusion happen only by spending more money. It helps but it doesn't fundamentally solve thr pace of true innovation.

I've been saying for years now that the next AI breakthrough could come from big tech but it also has just a likely chance of comming from a smart kid with a whiteboard.

But at the same time true or false what we're seeing is a kind of quasi science fiction. We're looking at the problems of the future here and to be honest it's going to suck for future us.

From that angle it's a game of who has the money, power, and diatribution to enact this manipulation.

Twitter being a prime example. Is Elon "right"? Maybe but the main point is it doesn't matter as he has the distribution.

If you have money but low to no distribution -> you do what gary is doing. Maybe he'd be interested in removing rights to vote but someone like Zuck would NOT because he has outsized ability to influence as he sees fit.

But true CL is the ability to learn out of distribution information on the fly.

The only true solution I know to continual learning is to completely retrain the model from scratch with every new example you encounter. That technically is achievable now but it also is effectively useless.