<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: johntb86</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=johntb86</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 07:34:26 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=johntb86" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by johntb86 in "Muse Spark 1.3"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Someone studied this (among other thigns): <a href="https://dylancastillo.co/posts/pelicanmaxxing.html" rel="nofollow">https://dylancastillo.co/posts/pelicanmaxxing.html</a> . Pelicans on bikes always face right in this test, but other animals on other transportation methods sometimes face left.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 20:38:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49542195</link><dc:creator>johntb86</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49542195</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49542195</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by johntb86 in "Wellington second-hand bookstore's mysterious orders"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Destroying the original makes it easier to justify that scanning the books is fair use, because you haven't increased the number of copies. See page 16 of <a href="https://copyrightalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Bartz-v.-Anthropic-Order.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://copyrightalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Bar...</a> : "This use was even more clearly transformative than those in Texaco, Google, and Sony Betamax (where the number of copies went up by at least one)"</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 07:19:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49342463</link><dc:creator>johntb86</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49342463</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49342463</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Patterns and problems in emerging multiagent systems]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/research/multiagent-systems">https://www.anthropic.com/research/multiagent-systems</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49302812">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49302812</a></p>
<p>Points: 4</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 18:33:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.anthropic.com/research/multiagent-systems</link><dc:creator>johntb86</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49302812</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49302812</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by johntb86 in "2027 memory capacity is reportedly sold out"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>AI companies aren't fabbing processors. They're buying capacity at fabs to make their own designs. To make more RAM, they'd need to invest in making more DRAM fabs, which is a slow process.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 20:25:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49215791</link><dc:creator>johntb86</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49215791</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49215791</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by johntb86 in "Be skeptical of OpenAI's rogue hacker agent story"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Intent often matters in the law (aside from certain laws with strict liability). You intentionally drive your car into someone you hate and kill them => murder, go straight to jail. You're driving along normally and someone who's chasing their pet cat suddenly runs into traffic and you hit them => no charges. Sometimes you can be charged with negligence for not taking enough care to prevent something, but then you have to deal with the tricky question of how much care is enough.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 20:35:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49041263</link><dc:creator>johntb86</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49041263</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49041263</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rare Autopsy Finds Alzheimer's Drugs Only Work in Some Parts of the Brain]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.sciencealert.com/rare-brain-autopsy-hints-at-why-alzheimers-drugs-are-failing">https://www.sciencealert.com/rare-brain-autopsy-hints-at-why-alzheimers-drugs-are-failing</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48923632">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48923632</a></p>
<p>Points: 6</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 16:47:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.sciencealert.com/rare-brain-autopsy-hints-at-why-alzheimers-drugs-are-failing</link><dc:creator>johntb86</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48923632</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48923632</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[SpaceX – AI Satellite]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.spacex.com/spacexai/starmind">https://www.spacex.com/spacexai/starmind</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862139">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862139</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 3</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 16:29:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.spacex.com/spacexai/starmind</link><dc:creator>johntb86</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862139</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862139</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by johntb86 in "Noam Shazeer Joins OpenAI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Nevertheless one has to feel very strongly to share such a take here in this manner unless they are gaining something from it.<p>Do they really? What does it cost them if they're wrong?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 22:22:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48592454</link><dc:creator>johntb86</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48592454</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48592454</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by johntb86 in "Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If they leave at all info about security patterns, you get an AI that knows how to code, but doesn't know what can make code insecure. That doesn't seem like a great idea.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 19:11:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48520430</link><dc:creator>johntb86</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48520430</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48520430</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by johntb86 in "Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Must have been <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mrGMMmrVNE" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mrGMMmrVNE</a> from Welch Labs.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 19:34:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47784102</link><dc:creator>johntb86</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47784102</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47784102</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by johntb86 in "FFmpeg 8.1"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"JPEG" is short for Joint Photographic Experts Group, an ISO/ITU group that creates a lot of imaging standards. The JPEG image format you're thinking of is only one of the formats they've created.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:25:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47414871</link><dc:creator>johntb86</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47414871</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47414871</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by johntb86 in "Judge finalizes order for Greenpeace to pay $345M in ND oil pipeline case"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Does anyone know what assets Greenpeace USA has? I imagine Greenpeace international will set up Greenpeace USA 2.0, all the volunteers/employees will move over, and the original will just go bankrupt.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 17:22:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47220974</link><dc:creator>johntb86</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47220974</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47220974</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by johntb86 in "10 years building vertical software: are we cooked?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Imagine being a vim or emacs user and have those replaced by something you have to type entire sentences for functionality.<p>As a former vim user who uses cursor, I've found that as the models get better I'm typing less and less. I appreciate the vim key bindings, but eventually I can imagine not missing them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 23:18:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47041657</link><dc:creator>johntb86</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47041657</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47041657</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by johntb86 in "Arm wants a bigger slice of the chip business"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Qualcomm won in court, so that doesn't seem to be the case.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 03:37:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47030600</link><dc:creator>johntb86</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47030600</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47030600</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by johntb86 in "Alex Honnold completes Taipei 101 skyscraper climb without ropes or safety net"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> The travel to/from Taiwan was statistically riskier than the climb.<p>That doesn't seem plausible. What's the number of free soloists who have died in climbing accidents vs in commercial aviation accidents?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2026 07:59:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46751783</link><dc:creator>johntb86</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46751783</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46751783</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by johntb86 in "Cursor's latest “browser experiment” implied success without evidence"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In theory you could generate a bunch of code that seems mostly correct and then gradually tweak it until it's closer and closer to compiling/working, but that seems ill-suited to how current AI agents work (or even how people work). AI agents are prone to make very local fixes without an understanding of wider context, where those local fixes break a lot of assumptions in other pieces of code.<p>It can be very hard to determine if an isolated patch that goes from one broken state to a different broken state is on net an improvement. Even if you were to count compile errors and attempt to minimize them, some compile errors can demonstrate fatal flaws in the design while others are minor syntax issues. It's much easier to say that broken tests are very bad and should be avoided completely, as then it's easier to ensure that no patch makes things worse than it was before.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 19:06:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46650647</link><dc:creator>johntb86</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46650647</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46650647</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by johntb86 in "Signs of introspection in large language models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's a fair point. Normally if you injected the "dog" token, that would cause a set of values to be populated into the kv cache, and those would later be picked up by the attention layers. The question is what's fundamentally different if you inject something into the activations instead?<p>I guess to some extent, the model is designed to take input as tokens, so there are built-in pathways (from the training data) for interrogating that and creating output based on that, while there's no trained-in mechanism for converting activation changes to output reflecting those activation changes. But that's not a very satisfying answer.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2025 00:19:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45778148</link><dc:creator>johntb86</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45778148</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45778148</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by johntb86 in "A definition of AGI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>But LLMs have been measured to have some theory of mind abilities at least as strong as humans: <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-024-01882-z" rel="nofollow">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-024-01882-z</a> . At this point you either need to accept that either LLMs are already conscious, or that it's easy enough to fake being conscious that it's practically impossible to test for - philosophical zombies are possible. It doesn't seem to me that LLMs are conscious, so consciousness isn't really observable to others.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:31:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45723885</link><dc:creator>johntb86</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45723885</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45723885</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by johntb86 in "Old Stockholm Telephone Tower"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Is that East Germany or West Germany?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2025 00:01:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45477825</link><dc:creator>johntb86</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45477825</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45477825</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by johntb86 in "Two Amazon delivery drones crash into crane in commercial area of Tolleson, AZ"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/news/790636/amazon-prime-mk30-drone-delivery-crash-arizona-pause" rel="nofollow">https://www.theverge.com/news/790636/amazon-prime-mk30-drone...</a> gives more information, including that<p>* No one was injured directly, but someone was treated for smoke inhalation<p>* The drones "were flying back to back"<p>* They hit the cable of a crane (including a link to a video showing the crane). <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_ZpY6qHcTk" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_ZpY6qHcTk</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2025 16:18:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45451702</link><dc:creator>johntb86</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45451702</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45451702</guid></item></channel></rss>