As a former vim user who uses cursor, I've found that as the models get better I'm typing less and less. I appreciate the vim key bindings, but eventually I can imagine not missing them.

That doesn't seem plausible. What's the number of free soloists who have died in climbing accidents vs in commercial aviation accidents?

It can be very hard to determine if an isolated patch that goes from one broken state to a different broken state is on net an improvement. Even if you were to count compile errors and attempt to minimize them, some compile errors can demonstrate fatal flaws in the design while others are minor syntax issues. It's much easier to say that broken tests are very bad and should be avoided completely, as then it's easier to ensure that no patch makes things worse than it was before.

I guess to some extent, the model is designed to take input as tokens, so there are built-in pathways (from the training data) for interrogating that and creating output based on that, while there's no trained-in mechanism for converting activation changes to output reflecting those activation changes. But that's not a very satisfying answer.

* No one was injured directly, but someone was treated for smoke inhalation

* The drones "were flying back to back"

* They hit the cable of a crane (including a link to a video showing the crane). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_ZpY6qHcTk

This seems more likely to have been written by some third party who'd annoyed about the license change.