<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: jonathanlydall</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=jonathanlydall</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 17:20:28 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=jonathanlydall" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jonathanlydall in "Soccer Arcade Games Through the Years"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Meta: Is there any way to disable to continually distracting bouncing blue circle at the bottom-right of the page (short of using an element/script blocker or something)?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 11:45:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48608518</link><dc:creator>jonathanlydall</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48608518</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48608518</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jonathanlydall in "The time the x86 emulator team found code so bad they fixed it during emulation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sure, my point wasn't that Windows Explorer is faster or slower compared to the command line or other OSes, but that deletion can be faster or slower (for Windows Explorer) depending on other factors too, like as per my example where it speeds up by 200% when I turn off that TortoiseGit option, which is nothing to scoff at.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 13:08:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48569998</link><dc:creator>jonathanlydall</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48569998</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48569998</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jonathanlydall in "The time the x86 emulator team found code so bad they fixed it during emulation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Your dismissive tone implies you think I’m lying or something about my stated (and reproduceable) experience that deletions absolutely run a 1/3rd slower with certain software installed.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 04:28:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48565664</link><dc:creator>jonathanlydall</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48565664</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48565664</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jonathanlydall in "The time the x86 emulator team found code so bad they fixed it during emulation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It is frustrating how slow .zip (and more recently .7z) support built into Windows Explorer is.<p>This is a great article on why it's so unreasonably slow to modify these archives:
<a href="https://textslashplain.com/2021/06/02/leaky-abstractions/" rel="nofollow">https://textslashplain.com/2021/06/02/leaky-abstractions/</a><p>But it doesn't seem to explain why it's so much slower at regular extraction.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 15:05:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48556419</link><dc:creator>jonathanlydall</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48556419</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48556419</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jonathanlydall in "The time the x86 emulator team found code so bad they fixed it during emulation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Its slowness is also a function of security software or any other file system "filters" (I believe they're called) are installed.<p>For example, I run TortoiseGit which has a caching feature which is supposed to make it faster at showing what to commit. Disabling it increases the number of items I can delete per second in my Windows Explorer from about 1000 to about 3000 while making not making TortoiseGit operations meaningfully slower (that I can tell).<p>This is a Dev Drive [0] on my machine, it would probably be slower on my C: drive which has full Windows Defender real time file scanning.<p>[0]: <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/windows/dev-drive/" rel="nofollow">https://learn.microsoft.com/windows/dev-drive/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 14:58:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48556308</link><dc:creator>jonathanlydall</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48556308</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48556308</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jonathanlydall in "Ian's Secure Shoelace Knot"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It appears we’ll have to agree to disagree.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 19:49:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48437918</link><dc:creator>jonathanlydall</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48437918</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48437918</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jonathanlydall in "Ian's Secure Shoelace Knot"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>But a standard shoelace knot is just so much better, not only can it hold for an entire day (even on, according to you, "bad" shoelaces), but its slip release makes it instant to untie at the end of the day.<p>Before when I used a granny knot, shoelaces were a regular nuisance for me, but since switching to a reef knot over a decade ago they have not been at all, and I have never had to buy other shoelaces either.<p>It confuses me that you seem to be defending the granny knot which is objectively worse in every way and you come across as wilfully stubborn to your own detriment.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 14:12:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48435062</link><dc:creator>jonathanlydall</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48435062</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48435062</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jonathanlydall in "Motorola effectively bricked its entire line of WiFi routers without explanation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’d never defend the lack of web based configuration, but there is an argument to be made that if the app uses Bluetooth to communicate with a router (though I don’t know if that’s true in this case), it is inarguably easier to configure for the average person who is intimidated by having to work with an IP address in any way.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 06:13:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48432329</link><dc:creator>jonathanlydall</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48432329</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48432329</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jonathanlydall in "Conventional Commits encourages focus on the wrong things"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’ve never personally used the chore term, but it doesn’t bother me to see it and I don’t feel it has a negative connotation.<p>Cleaning my kitchen after a meal may be a chore, but it’s not an intrinsically bad or unpleasant experience most of the time, it’s just good hygiene and afterwards I have the satisfaction of things being clean. Not cleaning the kitchen feels way worse to me as it ultimately leads to other far more unpleasant situations.<p>Such it is with updating dependencies, it generally needs to be done, so it’s good to do it, but it’s in no way noteworthy, so chore describes it perfectly, to me it signals that: “it’s work that needed to be done, but not for a feature, functionality change or bug fix on this particular code base, so you’re unlikely to see much change”.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 17:42:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48415833</link><dc:creator>jonathanlydall</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48415833</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48415833</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jonathanlydall in "Ian's Secure Shoelace Knot"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No, it had absolutely nothing to do with the quality of the laces.<p>It was because I was essentially tying a granny knot instead of a reef knot and anyone who knows anything about knots would realize that of course they would keep coming undone.<p>And for the record, since learning how to tie the correct knot (over 10 years ago now), I’ve had no problem with laces that have come with any of the following brands of shoes:<p>- Nike<p>- New Balance<p>- Asics<p>- Converse<p>- Vans</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 17:00:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401428</link><dc:creator>jonathanlydall</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401428</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401428</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jonathanlydall in "Ian's Secure Shoelace Knot"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Before your muscle memory is updated, all you need to remember is how to “quality check” the knot when you’re done. If the loops are perpendicular, it’s wrong, they should be aligned with the laces.<p>If it landed up perpendicular, start over (i.e. the part before you make the loops) with doing the opposite of what you did before e.g. right-over-left rather than left-over-right.<p>For me it was very easy to fix the pre-loop stage, trying to change the loop stage seemed way harder to me as I was already so practiced at it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 15:45:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48400347</link><dc:creator>jonathanlydall</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48400347</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48400347</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jonathanlydall in "Ian's Secure Shoelace Knot"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have this problem too!<p>It could make their lives so much better, but kind of awkward to broach. Perhaps sholladay‘s advice will work well.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 15:37:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48400246</link><dc:creator>jonathanlydall</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48400246</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48400246</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jonathanlydall in "Ian's Secure Shoelace Knot"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I only realized in my 30s that I had been tying my shoelaces wrong my whole life and a super minor change in my method has changed them from coming undone multiple times per day (unless double knotted), to instead staying tied the whole day with just a standard shoelace knot [0] (also on Ian's site).<p>This article's web page actually has the essential note:<p>> NOTE: If your finished knot comes out crooked (eg. loops pointing heel-to-toe), it's probably because you tie your Starting Knot the opposite way to mine. This will result in an un-balanced knot, which sits crooked and comes undone more easily. See my Granny Knot page for more information.<p>Back when I still used to browse Imgur, there was a post illustrating how to identify and fix this easy to make mistake. It turns out that I was starting with the lace <i>left-over-right</i> as opposed to <i>right-over-left</i> (or vice-versa, not sure off-hand).<p>This quite literally changed my life, just a small muscle memory tweak and now my laces easily stay tied the whole day with a regular knot which is also super easy to release as well.<p>[0]: <a href="https://www.fieggen.com/shoelace/standardknot.htm" rel="nofollow">https://www.fieggen.com/shoelace/standardknot.htm</a><p>Edit:<p>I see he has a page dedicated to this mistake here: <a href="https://www.fieggen.com/shoelace/grannyknot.htm" rel="nofollow">https://www.fieggen.com/shoelace/grannyknot.htm</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 13:42:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398538</link><dc:creator>jonathanlydall</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398538</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48398538</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft EXecution Container (MXC)]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://github.com/microsoft/mxc/tree/main">https://github.com/microsoft/mxc/tree/main</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393890">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393890</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 04:33:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://github.com/microsoft/mxc/tree/main</link><dc:creator>jonathanlydall</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393890</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48393890</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jonathanlydall in "CT scans of BYD car parts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Possible, but I doubt it.<p>Article says key fobs are the same across all their cars and this looks the same as mine for a Sealion 5, there is no hinge for the key you just pull it out.<p>Likely the article authors just assumed from looking at the scan, if they’d actually tried to remove the key they would have realised their mistake.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 04:47:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48380011</link><dc:creator>jonathanlydall</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48380011</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48380011</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Company Blew $500M on Claude AI in One Month]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.gadgetreview.com/company-blew-500m-on-claude-ai-in-one-month">https://www.gadgetreview.com/company-blew-500m-on-claude-ai-in-one-month</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48337859">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48337859</a></p>
<p>Points: 7</p>
<p># Comments: 3</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 16:17:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.gadgetreview.com/company-blew-500m-on-claude-ai-in-one-month</link><dc:creator>jonathanlydall</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48337859</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48337859</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jonathanlydall in "The UK government's Low Value Purchase System is a waste of time"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'd rather pay EUR 250 a year when I know the money is used for genuine public benefit rather than ZAR 250 a year where it's mostly enriching people who don't do anything of real value.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 08:29:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48333995</link><dc:creator>jonathanlydall</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48333995</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48333995</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jonathanlydall in "The UK government's Low Value Purchase System is a waste of time"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In South Africa we have a TV license which any shop selling TV’s is required by law to report the buyer’s TV license number for any purchase.<p>The idea is that it funds public broadcasting and productions thereof, but like a lot of SOEs here, there is loads of corruption and inefficiencies, I only use my TV for streaming of content which is not produced locally, so I resent having to pay it each year.<p>However, it’s apparently a mission to get off it, even if you sell your TV you’re most certainly going to be harassed for years by debt collectors and what not.<p>Unlike your case though (where I expect the fine is not nothing), it’s only like R250/y (like 13USD) and they’ve smartly (which is surprising for an otherwise largely incompetent org), made it easy to pay. I get an SMS reminder and can have paid it by credit card within 2 minutes. So I’ll probably not bother trying to get off it as it’s so much more effort and a pretty small amount of money and hassle.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 16:28:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48325442</link><dc:creator>jonathanlydall</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48325442</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48325442</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jonathanlydall in "Is AI causing a repeat of frontend’s lost decade?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The successful standards, platforms, libraries, tools, etc. will be the ones that LLMs can understand. Like a good GitHub readme, or website, or Discord community, I strongly feel that making sure you've (perhaps personally) written enough about your offering for AI to understand it will be an important factor in how successful it can be in markets or communities.<p>I wrote a similar HN comment around this yesterday, but the short version is that we found for our product that the years of investment in our Docs (which were seemingly never good enough) are now paying enormous dividends in that LLMs seem to understand our product really well. This has manifested in the LLM in our product being highly effective and a few additional clients who found us through AI chats. Turns out the problem with our Docs wasn't so much with their content, but rather that people just weren't looking at them much.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 15:05:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48324011</link><dc:creator>jonathanlydall</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48324011</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48324011</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jonathanlydall in "The real cost of owning a home"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’ve lived here most of my life.<p>Electricity has been essentially uninterrupted since the last load shedding about two years ago. I did get some solar panels and an inverter installed while load shedding was common as I work from home and didn’t want the stress due to lack of power. Another thing I put in our new kitchen is a couple of gas hobs next to the main induction ones, allows us to cook even during power outages. But as I said, no real outages in two years now.<p>Water is quite reliable, maybe interrupted half a dozen times in a year. I have 2kl of water backup tanks and a booster pump so I don’t generally feel any outage, although not uncommon, I expect that most middle class don’t have backup tanks like this. Regional water infrastructure hasn’t been keeping up with growth, so there is a large issue looming there.<p>Crime is common, but not so common that most people have been a victim of it. Most (middle class) people have house alarms linked to armed response services. I’m a member of community association which amongst other services they provide from membership fees, they also have a special arrangement with a security company and additional patrol vehicles are dedicated to our suburb.<p>Most security systems are door sensors and interior passive beams. I did however add outside beams which tends to catch intruders by surprise and gives early warning. I actually had an intruder in my garden last year and the outside beams caught the guy by surprise, he had dashed by the time the armed response got here. Harrowing for sure, but not tragic fortunately. Since then I added some IP cameras and there was a gap in my electric fencing above my garage which is where it seems they got in from, so I also had that remediated.<p>Our suburb (like many others, but not most) has road closures (gates get closed across most streets on the suburbs border) in effect except during morning and evening peak traffic times, this helps a lot, but criminals are regularly trying their luck in the area.<p>The intruder aside, and without load shedding, and being vigilant in case of criminals, it’s not that different than my 2 years I spent in Cork in Ireland where there was the occasional violence incidents with chavs and several water outages.<p>If I was living in a township (inhabited by those living well below a middle class wage) my experience would be quite different, probably lots more crime and I expect water and electricity to be quite spotty.<p>How will things be 10, 20 or 30 years from now?<p>My biggest worry right now is the water supply, but it’s more a worry of inconvenience of it being turned off regularly to manage demand. I’m expecting within 5 years they’ll have addressed it. Basically it’s a repeat of the electricity capacity shortage issue of the past, despite people telling government for over a decade they need to increase infrastructure to meet expanding demand, they do nothing until they run out.<p>Otherwise, I’m optimistic things will improve overall, not get worse. I think our democracy is maturing. The ANC which has managed to stay in power since the first democratic elections in ‘94 has been progressively losing voter share, it seems the masses are finally saying no to their excessive corruption and incompetence.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 21:27:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315743</link><dc:creator>jonathanlydall</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315743</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315743</guid></item></channel></rss>