Shipping is very important, sometimes more important than what you ship :)

Ideally also ability to drag faces like plasticity.

I'm not sure what kind of special torture you'd employ to make people display that kind of enthusiasm :)

Mythos being drummed up as a cyber weapon is not the same as it being a weapon -- and treating it as such is just dumb.

Yes, it may find vulnerabilities, but "find" is the keyword -- whatever it finds was already there.

My point is: Remember to enjoy your dreams. And 99% of the time let them be just that: "dreams".

CS 1.5, OpenTTD, AoE2, the likes..

Fancier graphics doesn't make games better. Gameplay, stories and jokes do.

Spying on employees is not free. If you want to spend serious resources doing it, there has to be an upside.

It's not anymore, right?

The idea that officials aren't personally liable for mistakes made in good faith isn't bad. But somehow the US tends to produce a lot of cases where good faith requires a lot of faith :)

But, yes, I would rather not have an outbreak of ebola.

If their license is void, then distribution is illegal, right?

If Josef really wants to go after BambuLab over AGPL violations he can do what the music/movie industries did: have them blocked at the ISP level.

Cease and desist for all servers outside China. Block traffic at ISP levels.

Unlike various pirate websites there won't be a hundred copy cats to also hunt down.

But when higher prices stick around industries close or never opened.

Stop there. The costs of today state-of-the-art hype-ware will be lower tomorrow.

In a year, there will be fewer easy to find bug, and models like this will be cheaper.

Doing math based on hardware deployed today is a bit naive.

Assuming any of this is intentional about reducing devs is just dumb.

No foreign investors would put money into US stonks.

It's not impossible, sure, but probably worse than the great depression.

All the ships stuck in the Gulf probably didn't consider the threat impotent.

On the other side: what more can the US do? Target civilian infrastructure? There is no appetite for getting stuck with boots on the ground, and everyone (including Iran) knows this.

You're probably right that it won't a win for anyone. If some of the points includes removing sanctions from Iran, it might be a huge win -- for Iran, or at-least it's population.

Lol, under what definition?

Personally, I have a hard time seeing any good actors here.

But of all the actors, I kind of doubt Israel is in it for the money.

Also the US has fairly strong private property rights.

Do you think Europeans are going to have a problem buying/selling US stonks any time soon?