A nice clean UI, and a very consistent and clean visual hierarchy.

I wouldn’t be able to use that API in any app with any significant number of concurrent users.

Or am I reading it wrong?

Ubuntu used to be the Debian that just worked without tweaking.

Today I find Debian to be the one which’s works without tweaking, and Ubuntu the one where one has to undo/disable lots of Ubuntuisms.

So for me: Server is Debian. Laptop is Arch.

Previous releases was MIR, Upstart, Snapd… This release it’s no X11 and GNU Coreutils replaced by buggy Rust rewrites.

Debian feels more like pure FOSS and in general just better. None of that icky flavour in the back of your mouth.

People here are discussing email apps, not Gmail apps.

Gmail apps only work with 1 provider (gmail), while email apps works with all email providers.

It’s closed too, sure, but at least it’s more consistent.

Still. This must be the first iPhone not to break page one.

Is that a good thing or a bad thing?

Edit: Page one I guess?

$2k is a lot to ask, but it answers the market 100% on “I’d like a Samsung Fold 8, but as an iPhone”.

A benefit of that system was that all documents and data could be easily treated as files - and moved organized as you pleased.

Somewhere along the line someone clearly decided that this was too simple and made storage opaque - and now you never know where anything is stored - and how or where to organize it.

I'm not sure I consider that an improvement.

You can’t use any random password-manager with passkey support.

I use Bitwarden for everything and have to have MS Authenticator installed just for this 1 login.

Super annoying.

Which actual genocide would you be talking about?

I really don’t think people should water out words like that over what is essentially tiny political differences.

Someone needs to fix a memory leak here.

Atom was famously slow. Even among people using it and championing it.

VSCode totally wowed people not just because it was faster, but because it was essentially the first «real» Electron-app which proved Electron-apps could have near native performance.

You got this part 100% backwards.

Outright rejecting the patches was IMO not a pragmatic or constructive choice and will drive the wrong incentives wether you morally approve of it or not.

He’s point is that because he was coming at this with an honest, open approach he saw his work rejected.

His observation is that this will reward dishonest submissions which are NOT made in good faith. Ie rewarding the wrong things.

Incentives drives the outcome. What incentives does this give people?

Humans can produce garbage code. As can AI. So therefore the process around the code matters, and it seems clear to me the author has had a reasonable process around the code, as opposed to blindly accepting some 1-shotted output.

To me this looks like good use of AI.