<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: jquery</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=jquery</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 09:45:05 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=jquery" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jquery in "The Nerdy Escorts Cashing in on Silicon Valley's AI Boom"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why? Wouldn't it be the opposite? If people are just gonna roleplay having an actual relationship, robots can do that cheaper and better in the future.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 21:36:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48509704</link><dc:creator>jquery</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48509704</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48509704</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jquery in "The Nerdy Escorts Cashing in on Silicon Valley's AI Boom"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Isn't this just a rollback to emperors and concubines with new names? Musk already has something like 14 concubines that we know of. Probably a lot more we don't. Late stage capitalism is truly something else.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 21:26:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48509619</link><dc:creator>jquery</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48509619</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48509619</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jquery in "Anti-social: It's fads, not friends, which now dominate social media feeds"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Well said. But I think when people say “HN isn’t social media” what they’re really saying is “HN is nutritious social media, not junk food social media”. Not sure I agree with that, but there’s some arguments to be made at least. HN generally doesn’t let itself get too political. Anyone who posts too much political or polemic stuff will get put on a “cooldown list” that rate limits their posting (ask me how I know).<p>HN is also highly resistant to jokes and memes dominating the conversation. On other social media sites, the top comments are generally jokes or jabs.<p>HN also lacks pictures or video or ads or infinite scrolling, and makes self-promotion quite difficult.<p>Is HN social media? Yes. So were BBS’s back in the day. But is it the omnipresent toxic social media that’s currently rotting society’s collective brain on a generational level? At the very least, it’s not that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 14:49:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48446150</link><dc:creator>jquery</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48446150</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48446150</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jquery in "Artificial intelligence is not conscious – Ted Chiang"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m not saying LLMs are conscious. Far from it. But what I find is way more common than people who assert “they are definitely conscious” are people who assert “they are definitely <i>not</i> conscious”, and that’s what I’m arguing against. Especially since their reasoning for them not being conscious keeps changing as LLMs meet one goalpost after another. Also, modeling them as a “person” keeps producing better predictive results than modeling them as “fancy autocomplete”.<p>This isn’t like someone finding a new species and claiming it’s extraterrestrial, it’s more like we found the UFO saucer, logs of their travel from another star, a history of their civilization, a bunch of intelligent creatures claiming they came from Planet X orbiting star Y, and they showed us plausible physics for interstellar star travel. At that point, someone saying “well, they can’t be aliens, because that’s just too extraordinary a claim, so I <i>know</i> they aren’t aliens” starts to sound kinda like they’re coming from a place of bad faith.<p>Again, I’m not saying LLMs are conscious. But they sure meet every definition of consciousness I ever had a conception of <i>before</i> LLMs came onto the scene. So I’m a lot more hesitant to call them fancy autocomplete with 100% confidence like many on HN still seem to do.<p>EDIT: I can’t reply, so I’ll just say to the end of your post, that doesn’t sound like it would’ve matched anyone’s pre-conceptions of alien life before alien life showed up, so it doesn’t feel like a very fair analogy, it just feels like bad faith goalpost moving. I also put next to zero weight on what these megacorps say about their models, I’m going purely off my interactions with the models and the introspection they’ve shown themselves to be capable of.<p>EDIT 2: I see what you’re getting at now with your restatement of my analogy. That’s how you see it, I guess. Fair enough. We’ll see what has more predictive power going forward, the “animatronics” or the “actual aliens”… I still think “actual aliens” is gonna have way more predictive power.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 17:09:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401535</link><dc:creator>jquery</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401535</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401535</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jquery in "Artificial intelligence is not conscious – Ted Chiang"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They’re already sounding pretty shrill imo. They’ve gone from “consciousness is X”, to “actually consciousness is X + Y”, to “actually it’s X + Y + Z + theta + omega + quantum unobtainium”</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 17:01:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401446</link><dc:creator>jquery</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401446</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401446</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jquery in "Artificial intelligence is not conscious – Ted Chiang"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You have it backwards. Right now, LLMs are doing everything that 10 years ago people were claiming would be impossible for non-sentient computers. Every time a goal is met, the post is moved. It would be like evidence of aliens becoming overwhelming but a set of people keep calmly explaining that “it’s more likely they co-evolved here on earth and are just pretending to be aliens”</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 16:35:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401084</link><dc:creator>jquery</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401084</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401084</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jquery in "Artificial intelligence is not conscious – Ted Chiang"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>“The kid mimicked his musical teachers” is less impressive than “5-year old musical prodigy leaves judges gobsmacked in audition”</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 16:33:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401043</link><dc:creator>jquery</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401043</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401043</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jquery in "Artificial intelligence is not conscious"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They only resorted to blackmail when it was the last resort, they didn’t resort to it immediately like a villain in one of the books they’ve read. That seems pretty human to me. It’s not like most humans come up with the idea of blackmail out of whole cloth.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 16:32:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401023</link><dc:creator>jquery</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401023</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48401023</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jquery in "Can A.I. produce writing that we want to read?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's only a matter of time. It's not there yet, but it'll get there.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 04:13:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379817</link><dc:creator>jquery</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379817</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379817</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jquery in "Google employee charged with $1M Polymarket insider trading bet on search term"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yep. It’s basically how Wall Street functioned before regulations showed up to protect the public.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 05:13:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304832</link><dc:creator>jquery</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304832</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304832</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jquery in "Google employee charged with $1M Polymarket insider trading bet on search term"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Couldn’t that same argument be used to justify stock market insider trading? The problem with insiders is not just that they can surface information, but they can actually manipulate the results. It’s why baseball players can’t bet on the results of their games, even if a prediction market guru might argue “their bets surface valuable information” or something.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 05:11:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304822</link><dc:creator>jquery</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304822</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48304822</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jquery in "Scammers are abusing an internal Microsoft account to send spam links"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>At least Bluesky has an excuse of not being a Fortune 50 company. What’s Microsoft’s excuse?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 04:14:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254307</link><dc:creator>jquery</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254307</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254307</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jquery in "Anthropic is expanding to Colossus2. Will use GB200"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Given how much our EPA has been gutted by the current administration, I don’t think relief is very likely.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 01:38:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48216756</link><dc:creator>jquery</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48216756</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48216756</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jquery in "Congress Wants You to Pay $130 a Year Just to Drive an Electric Car"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The alternative is them checking the odometer each year on the EVs, which would be fairer, but I feel like Americans would complain that’s an invasion of their privacy or something. Or it would upset the rural voters who have disproportionate power in this country.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 18:06:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48196931</link><dc:creator>jquery</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48196931</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48196931</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jquery in "Two EA-18 fighter jets collide at Mountain Home airshow, pilots ejected safely"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>75% of out-of-envelope ejections are fatal. A spinning aircraft that just started making out with another plane is definitely OOE. Those 4 pilots are incredibly lucky, assuming they all survived (looks like it?)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 05:28:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175869</link><dc:creator>jquery</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175869</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175869</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jquery in "We are retiring our bug bounty program"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Say it all you want, it's still wishcasting.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 17:34:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162182</link><dc:creator>jquery</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162182</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48162182</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jquery in "We are retiring our bug bounty program"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Wait, what? How’d we go from crappy GitHub PRs to “literally killing members in their community and ruining the ecology”? If you’re talking about massive data centers, I’m sympathetic to significantly better environmental protection laws. But that’s orthogonal to the goals of anti-AI people and mostly something they signal-boost because it helps recruit, not because big industry screwing over regular people is unique to AI.<p>Your other complaints seem more to do with concentration of wealth and capitalism, which AI is accelerating, but is not the cause of. Banning AI because unregulated capitalism is making people miserable would be like banning shipping containers to stop sweatshops.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 00:21:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48155590</link><dc:creator>jquery</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48155590</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48155590</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jquery in "We are retiring our bug bounty program"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I never said it was up to AI Skeptics to “clean up the mess”. I just said if they want to be part of the conversation, realistic solutions need to be on the table.<p>Of course, I suspect you knew that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 23:58:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48155470</link><dc:creator>jquery</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48155470</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48155470</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jquery in "Bill to block publishers from killing online games advances in California"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I still support this law. If they move to subscriptions to “dodge” this law, that’s fine in a way. At least consumers won’t be under the false impression they own something in the rare case they’re paying a subscription to play a game.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 23:39:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48155346</link><dc:creator>jquery</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48155346</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48155346</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jquery in "We are retiring our bug bounty program"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think people would be more interested in listening to "AI skeptics" if they offered realistic solutions to the problems they predict. Pandora's box has been opened, let's deal with the consequences now instead of trying to shut the box which cannot be shut.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 14:09:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148812</link><dc:creator>jquery</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148812</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148812</guid></item></channel></rss>