<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: jstimpfle</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=jstimpfle</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 17:27:15 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=jstimpfle" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jstimpfle in "What Zig felt like, coming from Rust"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't even have to search. Given the frequency of you repeating the same old tired stories, one is bound to stumble over your comments every other day.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 16:21:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49767812</link><dc:creator>jstimpfle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49767812</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49767812</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jstimpfle in "What Zig felt like, coming from Rust"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There is plenty history of you repeating the same strawmans literally thousands of times. I've just never seen _anyone_ on HN (or elsewhere for that matter) make such claims?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 16:06:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49767686</link><dc:creator>jstimpfle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49767686</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49767686</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jstimpfle in "What Zig felt like, coming from Rust"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You repeating this weird strawman take a million times doesn't make it true. Why don't you finally just put out some genuinely interesting projects demonstrating how everybody was doing it wrong, so people can make up their own mind and finally be convinced. There must be some true magic in those languages and platforms you mention, that should offset the pain of writing in upper case and with super long KEYWORDs everywhere, and to offset the cost of switching to a culture that has way less mindshare and way less of a software ecosystem around it.<p>FWIW I've actually worked for 6 months on a large old Delphi project. It was some performance work that, as almost always, mainly required getting the language crap out of the way. In the end I got the job done (100x-1000x speedup) but I wouldn't want to switch back to this ecosystem: Licensing costs, weird language warts there too. A slow moving ecosystem. Ultimately, I just need something that does what I tell it to do, reliably and fast, and that doesn't get in the way.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 15:01:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49767117</link><dc:creator>jstimpfle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49767117</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49767117</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jstimpfle in "Stabilizing Rust's Never Type"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For the most part, software does not exist in a vacuum. If there is a serious bug, or much improved feature, in a library you depend on, what do you do? Most likely you'll try to upgrade the library. Same deal for the compiler, it's a huge dependency.<p>If your project is truly done, by all means ship it on a N64 cartridge. I can't say I don't have sympathy for that attitude. But don't expect this is how the world works today. And don't forget, N64 cartridges weren't built using massive amounts of dependency, so it was easier to confidently declare something "done".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 15:44:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49685258</link><dc:creator>jstimpfle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49685258</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49685258</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jstimpfle in "Programming is Art"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I believe there are many top level chess masters that consider chess an art. Same for programmers, to many of the best, it is an art form or at least a craft that they take very seriously. And many would disagree that programming is solved. "Boring and standard" can be a sign of quality, but it also applies to those code bases that don't solve any interesting problems and just drown in boilerplate, kept alive by dozens or hundreds of programmer drones just working to collect their paychecks.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 09:35:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49596148</link><dc:creator>jstimpfle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49596148</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49596148</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jstimpfle in "Carbon-aware electricity pricing, measured daily on 38 grids"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Good to point out the difference between taxes and other tariffs, but I have a hard time understanding why you have to call what I said "wrong"? What you went to explain in detail is exactly what I alluded to, that also matches the previous posters "electricity [...] taxed into oblivion".<p>Another point: 3.3% of federal tax income, or 1.7% of all taxes paid by citizens, goes directly into "Klima- und Transformationsfonds" i.e. gets pumped into energy transformation. And the state even pumps more money into that, by means of "Sondervermögen" (taking additional debts). Measured as a percentage of federal state tax income, seems like Germany is pumping more than 7% total into energy transformation. Quite a lot I think, and even if this is not directly a tariff on electricity, it's easy to imagine how this can result in general price inflation.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 16:19:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49588005</link><dc:creator>jstimpfle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49588005</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49588005</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jstimpfle in "Carbon-aware electricity pricing, measured daily on 38 grids"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The prices of so many things have gone down with times due to increased efficiencies. Why not electricity? If solar PV is cheaper than fossils, I would, naive as I am, expect prices to go down.<p>(I acknowledge fossils have been going up for various reasons, and have become more scarce, and energy demands are rising)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 20:54:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49570085</link><dc:creator>jstimpfle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49570085</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49570085</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jstimpfle in "Carbon-aware electricity pricing, measured daily on 38 grids"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>FTR and for the inevitable downvoters, I am not a fan of fossil energy. I am merely a fan of well presented arguments, and downvotes aren't that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 18:46:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49568541</link><dc:creator>jstimpfle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49568541</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49568541</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jstimpfle in "Carbon-aware electricity pricing, measured daily on 38 grids"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What I am saying is that those spot prices may not represent all of the reneweables' marginal costs. Question is, will the end consumer prices ever go down, and by how much?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 18:02:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49568033</link><dc:creator>jstimpfle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49568033</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49568033</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jstimpfle in "Carbon-aware electricity pricing, measured daily on 38 grids"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I was under the impression that the taxes are going into infrastructure and grants for renewable energies, meaning those energy prices are maybe way higher than advertised. Funny thing is we are constantly being told how cheap reneweables are to produce but apparently there are other costs involved.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 17:45:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49567823</link><dc:creator>jstimpfle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49567823</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49567823</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jstimpfle in "Carbon-aware electricity pricing, measured daily on 38 grids"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why I said not only... but also.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 17:40:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49567754</link><dc:creator>jstimpfle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49567754</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49567754</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jstimpfle in "Carbon-aware electricity pricing, measured daily on 38 grids"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is interesting, but now explain why Germany has both the highest electricity prices in Europe as well as a relatively high CO2 footprint from electricity? Germany is buying not only nuclear but also coal energy from neighbouring countries.<p>Will this be fixed at some point or is the German model not actually as good as you imply?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 12:51:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49563868</link><dc:creator>jstimpfle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49563868</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49563868</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jstimpfle in "Omarchy development practices lead to predictable security issues"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not following Omarchy, not even sure what it is trying to be compared to existing distros (other than an incredibly hyped up product). Not hating on DHH. But hasn't he become famous for developing a web framework (20 years ago), rather than for his technical prowess as a systems-level engineer? Seeing these kinds of bugs is not exactly unexpected.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 12:33:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49447898</link><dc:creator>jstimpfle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49447898</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49447898</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jstimpfle in "Fast and Hard Code"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I actually explained well enough why this requires to a large degree a competent developer to judge.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 07:27:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49416291</link><dc:creator>jstimpfle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49416291</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49416291</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jstimpfle in "Fast and Hard Code"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Good, you achieved a 10% speedup for a particular workload that some users said they care about. But how do you find out that was really the feature that should have been built next? How do you prevent adding badly factored code? How to make sure you don't pile on top of existing tech debt in the codebase, that you are solving the most fundamental issues first?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 21:54:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49412995</link><dc:creator>jstimpfle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49412995</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49412995</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jstimpfle in "Fast and Hard Code"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>How do you measure them if you don't understand what you're doing? A shitty benchmark or small test suite is not how solid software gets made.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 20:04:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49412075</link><dc:creator>jstimpfle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49412075</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49412075</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jstimpfle in "Fast and Hard Code"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What are you talking about?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 16:13:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49409991</link><dc:creator>jstimpfle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49409991</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49409991</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jstimpfle in "Fast and Hard Code"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>How do you judge "better" if you don't understand the LLM output?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 15:26:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49409582</link><dc:creator>jstimpfle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49409582</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49409582</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jstimpfle in "The Two Factions of C++ (2024)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes -- I can see good use for runtimes. For example, compiler can autogenerate good runtime error messages. Thinking about it, debuggers make use of reflection. Debuginfo formats have some kind of reflection built in.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 14:47:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49362383</link><dc:creator>jstimpfle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49362383</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49362383</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jstimpfle in "The Two Factions of C++ (2024)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Reflection is a joke. De/serializing arbitrary C++ structs is ill-defined. When you need serialization, even lots of it (e.g. silly JSON), I think you're better off writing your own framework where you can be clear about data formats and transformation rules.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 10:35:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49359617</link><dc:creator>jstimpfle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49359617</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49359617</guid></item></channel></rss>