There is a vast range of scenarios in which being more or less independent from agents to perform cognitive tasks will be both desirable and necessary, at the individual, societal and economic level.

The question of how much territory we should give up to AI really is both philosophical and political. It isn’t going to be settled in mere one-sided arguments.

I actually believe that there are much better ways to incorporate AI into software development than any of the mechanisms we’ve seen so far. For instance, it would make a lot more sense that you actually write the software manually and get the usual autocomplete suggestions, along with some on the fly reviews, an extension proposals, such as writing the body of a function that you’re calling from the core function you’re writing now.

This is why I am so deeply opposed to using AI for problem solving I suppose: it just doesn’t play nice with this process.

Probably some guys posting on behalf of its agent (easy to do). Maybe agents should develop a CAPTCHA for humans lol

Especially when the value of the end result is close to zero, since it is now so easy to do and replicate.

Also, I suspect that OP would have learned so much more on the topic.

Also, OP claims that he is here to learn, but he is mostly chasing cheap GH stars to boost his resume. How insulting is that?

And what a refreshment from f*king AI slop that you find everywhere these days.

They will implement something using GPT-4 or Claude and this whole mess will be forgotten.