That doesn't seem correct. Wasn't the predication that once China started to become successful they'd open up and become more democratic?

Which clearly didn't happen, as per the outright slaughter of the Chinese university students who were protesting in 1989: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests...

It's an alternative webUI for Mikrotik routers, coded with LLM assistance.

Good question. It's probably not, in that the installer and whatever it installs have probably been signed by something official that Windows trusts.

That's just my guessing though.

--

It'd also be interesting to see what happens with non-Windows based computers. ie macOS and Linux users that plug an affected LG monitor in

> The findings, based on experiments in mice and human cells [...]

Alternatively, perhaps Google has a culture problem where it encourages crap like this?

This is a website collecting the AI mishaps in the law field around the world:

https://www.damiencharlotin.com/hallucinations/

It seems pretty extensive (1696 cases identified so far), and appears to be updated regularly. :)

I've worked in those industries, and there's a large gap between the theory of what you're saying vs the practical reality when the CxO suite are pushing AI on everyone. :(

It's easy to see both pros and cons of that. I guess, like most stuff, it depends upon the appetite for risk vs the downsides of false positives/negatives and incorrect analysis.

Ugh. Sure, for non-critical stuff that might be acceptable, but for anyone working on core banking or infrastructure PLEASE don't be doing this.

Actually no, that doesn't seem to be loading fully. :(

The Wayback machine doesn't have a working version either.

> A misconfiguration while adding the new primary mirror temporarily impacted access to the kernel archives on our mirrors. A fix has been implemented, and we are currently working to restore all content.

Dunno about that. I work in writing infrastructure code (telco space), and while we do use Claude Code (Optus 4.8/Fable 5/etc) there still needs to be extremely thorough review and a close watch kept on its output.

AI generated code that's not carefully managed is not suitable for really important things. At least, not the stuff I've seen it generate so far both for my colleagues and myself.