<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: jzb</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=jzb</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 11:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=jzb" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jzb in "US and Iran agree to provisional ceasefire"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>To summarize: a far worse deal than what Obama had and Trump ripped up, and worse than the status quo that existed before Trump started illegally bombing Iran.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 12:03:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47689038</link><dc:creator>jzb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47689038</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47689038</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jzb in "Study finds no evidence cannabis helps anxiety, depression, or PTSD"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There’s a difference between intoxication and treating the chemical imbalance behind depression or anxiety. For one thing, treatments for anxiety only target the anxiety: they don’t impair the person the way that weed or alcohol does. (They can have other side effects, of course.)<p>Drugs for anxiety treatment do wear off, but not the same way that weed or alcohol does: something like Celexa takes a few weeks to build up in the system, and don’t lose effect 12-24 hours later if you miss a dose. I’m not sure how long you’d have to stop before it loses efficacy entirely.<p>I’m not Nancy Reagan, though: I would not advise people to self-medicate with booze or pot if they’re suffering from depression or anxiety, but I’m not going to preach at anybody who is doing so and thinks it’s working for them. I will say that I’ve seen that end badly, though. I can think of three people I’m close to who’ve tried it and have had problems with addiction: all of them are now sober and (I believe) on regular antidepressants.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 22:11:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47472033</link><dc:creator>jzb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47472033</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47472033</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jzb in "Life as an OnlyFans 'chatter'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Which goes back to the shame thing, really. Few people are willing to stand up and advocate for common sense laws because they don’t want to be associated with anything regarding sex. Politicians, whom are not generally noted for being averse to hiring sex workers, sure as hell don’t want to be advocating for them for fear of losing elections.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 19:02:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47379964</link><dc:creator>jzb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47379964</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47379964</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jzb in "Iran warns U.S. tech firms could become targets as war expands"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"Nobody in the middle of an existential war threatens to attack more - they just attack with everything they've got."<p>That sounds like a poor strategy. Expend all of your resources in one grand gesture rather than trying to push your enemy's internal factions to curtail or end the fighting?<p>Unlike the current US administration, Iran is playing a long game - one in which it has been isolated in many ways. Indiscriminate attacks on civilian targets is not going to win it many friends; putting pressure on the tech companies that have been buddying up to the administration and may have some sway, on the other hand, is a cheap strategy that could pay off. Iran understands that the only language that seems to matter with Trump's backers is profit; threaten that and you may have some success.<p>The fact that Iran has already done some damage to AWS data centers makes it seem likely they could do so again if they tried. I don't know for certain, I'm not a military intelligence expert, but the strategy of "throw the kitchen sink at it" seems like a sure loser.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 22:00:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47342716</link><dc:creator>jzb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47342716</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47342716</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jzb in "Iran warns U.S. tech firms could become targets as war expands"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"Iran has always lacked an ability to project power at a distance"<p>I'm curious what you're basing this on, since Iran has been supplying Russia with drones, etc. for much of the war in Ukraine and so far has launched attacks into Jordan, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Oman, and Cyprus since the US began its attacks.<p>Iran may not be able to strike at sites in the US, but it could certainly target data centers in the Middle East with some hope of success. I'm not at all confident the current administration has accurately assessed Iran's capabilities or has the ability to protect the assets of US-based companies (or US citizens) in that region.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 21:52:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47342594</link><dc:creator>jzb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47342594</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47342594</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jzb in "US orders diplomats to fight data sovereignty initiatives"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The article didn’t say it was wrong by my reading: it reported that it’s happening.<p>That said: “benefits US companies” != good public policy for the US as a whole. It’s explicitly trying to interfere in how other countries govern themselves for the benefit of shareholders, not because it’s necessarily good policy.<p>It’s also something we wouldn’t necessarily appreciate if done to us by our allies. If we have any actual allies left given all of Trump’s tariffs and threats against other countries.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 16:22:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47153646</link><dc:creator>jzb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47153646</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47153646</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jzb in "Music Discovery"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nothing beats humans with great music tastes and deep knowledge. I’ve yet to find any form of recommendation engine that has surprised and delighted me the way humans have.<p>This tool might unearth something interesting, but I find it sus that it’s recommended the same artist (Adrianne Lenker) when I asked about Aimee Mann and Steven Jessie Bernstein.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 04:24:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47118117</link><dc:creator>jzb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47118117</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47118117</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jzb in "An AI agent published a hit piece on me"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The AI doesn’t “know” anything. It’s a program.<p>Destroying the bot would be analogous to burning a library or desecrating a work of art. Barring a bot from participating in development of a project is not wronging it, not in any way immoral. It’s not automatically wrong to bar a person from participating, either - no one has an inherent right to contribute to a project.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 18:02:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47005646</link><dc:creator>jzb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47005646</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47005646</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jzb in "Microsoft open-sources LiteBox, a security-focused library OS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>And it’s the employees that’ll be laid off if the strategy doesn’t succeed because they just didn’t copilot hard enough or something.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2026 05:48:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46921652</link><dc:creator>jzb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46921652</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46921652</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jzb in "Retiring GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1 mini, and OpenAI o4-mini in ChatGPT"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>“No advertisements” seems extreme to me. I want to know when a good band is playing at a local venue, or has an album out. I like hearing about new books, or a restaurant near me.<p>The absolutist position that “all ads are always bad” is a non-starter for me. Especially as long as we exist in a capitalist system. Small business, indie creators, etc. must advertise in some fashion to survive. It’s only the behemoths that could afford to stop doing it (ironically). I’ve never really understood why, e.g. Pepsi and Coke spend so much on advertising: most people already have a preference and I am skeptical that the millions they spend actually moves the needle either way. (“Is Pepsi okay?” “It absolutely is not.”)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 08:45:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46821993</link><dc:creator>jzb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46821993</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46821993</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jzb in "LWN is currently under the heaviest scraper attack seen yet"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not at the moment. It’s subsided for now.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 21:53:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46652735</link><dc:creator>jzb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46652735</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46652735</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jzb in "Pentagon moves to punish Democratic senator over 'seditious video'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"Aren't they required to obey chain-of-command?"<p>If an order is legal, yes. Not if an order is illegal. If a superior officer orders a private to shoot unarmed civilians or commit some other war crime, the private is supposed to refuse the order. They are not protected by a "just following orders" defense.<p>"And doesn't their pay and their family's healthcare depend on them remaining employed?"<p>Sure. But that does not excuse committing war crimes or otherwise knowingly following illegal orders.<p><i>Most</i> of the time, the presumption is that illegal orders will be issued infrequently and by rogue elements in the armed forces -- so disobeying may have unpleasant immediate consequences (say, get thrown in the brig) but long-term they should prevail.<p>Right now? Well... that's the problem. But if significant numbers of the armed forces refused illegal orders, there's little that the administration can do. Which is why they've been cleaning house to kick out anybody at the top who might push back.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 21:33:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46505299</link><dc:creator>jzb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46505299</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46505299</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jzb in "Linux is good now"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I imagine the people saying “it just works” are saying it because it does, at least for them.<p>SteamOS is based on Arch, but customized and aimed at specific hardware configurations. It’d be interesting to know what hardware you’re using and if any of your components are not well supported.<p>FWIW, I’ve used Steam on Linux (mostly PopOS until this year, then Bazzite) for years and years without many problems. ISTR having to do something to make Quake III work a few years ago, but it ran fine after and I’ve recently reinstalled it and didn’t have to fuss with anything.<p>Granted, I don’t run a huge variety of games, but I’ve finished several or played for many hours without crashes, etc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 23:18:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46459298</link><dc:creator>jzb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46459298</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46459298</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jzb in "I stayed in a $40 capsule hotel (London)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>How would you sleep with those things on your head? Might work for people who sleep on their back, but not great for side sleepers.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2025 12:52:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46410726</link><dc:creator>jzb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46410726</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46410726</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jzb in "Jimmy Lai Is a Martyr for Freedom"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think it’s more accurate to say that Western policymakers sold that story to the public on behalf of the companies that bought, er, lobbied them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 22:45:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46360091</link><dc:creator>jzb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46360091</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46360091</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jzb in "Rob Reiner has died"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Indeed. I grew up watching AitF, and I remember being totally floored when I realized he directed “When Harry Met Sally.”<p>Really sad end to a great career and as far as I could tell, a decent human being.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 12:36:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46273680</link><dc:creator>jzb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46273680</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46273680</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jzb in "Rob Reiner has died"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>“They could simply name their source(s) if they wanted to be taken as credible.”<p>Not if they want sources again in the future. Assuming they have credible sources, it will prove them correct in due course. The vast majority of people aren’t grading news outlets on a minute-by-minute basis like this: if they read in People first it was his son, and two weeks from now it’s his son, they’re going to credit People with being correct and where they learned it first.<p>And if People burned the sources who told them this, industry people would remember that, too.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 12:32:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46273643</link><dc:creator>jzb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46273643</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46273643</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jzb in "Crews claim Boring Company failed to pay workers and snubbed OSHA concerns"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Musk is Justin Hammer.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 21:34:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46062602</link><dc:creator>jzb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46062602</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46062602</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jzb in "APT Rust requirement raises questions"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m very very curious to know what it is you’re doing to experience this: I’ve used Debian and its derivatives for 25 years now. On desktops, laptops, and servers. x86, x86-64, and Arm 64. I have <i>never</i> had a segfault with APT. Not a single time. Problems with dependencies or such a few times, but I don’t recall APT ever crashing on me.<p>Please, share more details.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 00:11:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46052496</link><dc:creator>jzb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46052496</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46052496</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jzb in "AirPods libreated from Apple's ecosystem"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No, they’re designed to work <i>worse</i> with non-Apple products to keep people in the Apple ecosystem. Sure, if you’re not already in the ecosystem it does make sense to buy other products. But if you already own AirPods then you’re reluctant to switch to Android or Linux/Windows, because you either have a degraded experience or have to shell out for new stuff.<p>It’s convenient only as long you stick to their closed ecosystem. Requiring a device to identify as an Apple device to expose all features is an anti-feature. The devices should expose all features regardless, and leave it to the device/platform vendor to implement the config software.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2025 11:10:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45944193</link><dc:creator>jzb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45944193</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45944193</guid></item></channel></rss>