Doesn't prompt injection make that a rather flimsy investigation?

Uh, dumb question, how is 1.7 volts "ultra high potential" ? Is that even enough to do electrolysis like they're talking about?

The interface and performance are just so well thought out and refined.

Plus it contains the earliest published code I ever wrote: https://github.com/tsirysndr/rockbox-zig/tree/master/apps/pl... , so that's fun for me.

In practice credit cards just have way better fraud protections.

It's also like, straight up softcore porn with the avatars. Which is fine I guess, but I feel gross playing it in public, which is annoying. Mahjsoul is not a lot better there, but a little.

> So, as a general rule, the farther out astronomers look, the younger the stars are.

What you're describing is a recipe for a few people to get rich while everybody else starves and dies in wars.

British spies in WWII wouldn't do that if the entire concept of what a swastika was baffled them. You have to understand at least basically what the thing you're looking at is in order to use it as a symbol.

If you have _no_ concept of people being made out of meat being possible, you don't dress up as people made out of meat. You do that if it's a common concept to you and you're trying to fit in.

I mean, I already did. You also don't even agree on what _already_ happened, so I don't expect much to change in the next few weeks there. This for example:

> Just a reminder you were wrong about this part: (a lot of equipment on both sides).

You honestly think that the US didn't lose "a lot of equipment", or am I misreading what you're saying there?

But here's my predictions, consolidated:

The Strait will be monetized by Iran and more controlled compared to pre-war. Sanctions on Iran will be reduced or eliminated from their pre-war levels. There will not be any effective controls on what drones or missiles that Iran can build.

In five years, Iran will have a nuclear bomb. Probably much sooner, but I doubt it will be super public or unambiguous.

> No matter what the justification or reasoning is they'll never be permitted to have one.

Why does North Korea have nuclear weapons now, and why does that not apply to Iran in the future?

You hopefully realize that _I_ probably know what I meant, and that I'm in the discussion?

This is what I said:

> The sanctions are gone or heavily weakened so their can sell their oil to the world instead of selling it to China at a relative loss

What about that doesn't match the link I provided? Iran gets to sell their oil more easily and for more money, because we dropped sanctions. I didn't mention the why the US chose to do it, but "we fucked up and need to panic and try to do anything possible to keep oil prices down" doesn't make it any less true.

> Well to date they lost a lot of military equipment that they can't get back - we would bomb it again too. They've lost any progress toward nuclear weapons unless helped by other adversaries like China, Russia, or North Korea, and they've had their leadership destroyed.

I don't know the details of their nuclear program, but my understanding is that they have a bunch of highly enriched uranium and they lost ~none of it. I would guess that they're about where they were before except now they certainly know they need to go for a bomb at all costs and will do so. There's no choice, because the US won't stop until they do. They had a deal where they agreed not to pursue a bomb, and the US broke it, and now the US keeps attacking whenever they feel like it.

> Like, in what world does a comment like this even make sense? "They lost a lot of stuff, but they gained ways to build 100x as much back."

> How did they gain a way to build 100x what they lost when they have no ability to build anything at scale that we don't allow? If they build a factory we just blow it up.

They will come out of this with more money due to having a better excuse to exploit the Strait and reduced or eliminated sanctions.

You think we're going to just sit there and blow up every factory they build for all eternity? Then why did we propose a ceasefire? Will the agreement after this war include that they never get to build another factory? What do you think happens from here?

I think I'm good on this discussion, have a good day. Just look at what the _actual_ outcome of this war is in a few weeks and see if Iran's regime is better or worse off than they started. I think if you actually see the truth of what happens you'll be surprised.

Your view of war seems to be rooted in "well I really blew that thing up good, I win!". It's not that simple.