Alice is in a wheelchair.

Bob has a broken leg.

Charlie is unfit, but otherwise a healthy adult.

Alice, Bob, and Charlie would all say "I find getting up the hills of San Francisco difficult". But "doesn't everyone find that hard" conflates the causes and severity of the difficulty for the three of them in a way that isn't useful for making their complaints feel heard, or addressing the complaints such that they don't have that issue.

For example:

Alice could get an electric wheelchair.

Bob could take public transit / Ubers up, or get rides from their friends.

Charlie could take up running with friends.

Not sure how to reach out, but I'm definitely interested in reading about procedural methods in music synthesis. Any links describing your approach?

If I were to guess, you're saying that you reverse engineer the API boundary without reverse engineering the implementation. But then figuring out what the API contact is without documentation seems intractable for most API boundaries.

The event horizon is the distance where all straight lines lead to the black hole.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40105674

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

You need to control for confounders. For example, if I told you:

- Mean lifespan of species 1 is: 3 years - Mean lifespan of species 2 is: 10 years

Does that mean that species 2 has a longer lifespan than species 1?

What happens when you find out that species 1 is domesticated cattle, which has (almost) all of its males slaughtered at age 2?

You could then say "I meant for two species that are in controlled conditions", but now you need to define what conditions you're controlling, which implies what casual mechanisms you're controlling for.

What would it take to convince you that people don't do everything to attract a high-status mate?

They don't. There have been really good AAA games before Jeff started making games. His business model does not revolve around getting people to play his games before they discover better ones. His business model is to make games that can't be compared like that.

You're paid somewhere between the minimum amount you'll accept and the maximum that the company is willing to give you (which in the case of some VC funded companies, may exceed the amount of profit you generate!)

Where you're paid on that spectrum depends on how much leverage you have vs. the company.

The follow-up is that based on the manipulated income data, wealthy people pay disproportionately more taxes?

The goal of the transaction is for the Spanish bank to have access to USD. In the example given, the Spanish bank would then have to take the crypto it got and trust an exchange to give it USD in exchange for the crypto.

How do you get USD to the Spanish bank without trusting a third party?