They managed to achieve eventual consistency in a distributed system, thousands of years before we even thought of it.

I would invest in a proper firewall for the entire home before opening up anything to the world, IPv6 or not.

With the amount of bot traffic I'm seeing these days, I would guess that the waste ratio is more like 99% now. That means a 90% reduction in conversions for the same ad budget. Surely someone is feeling the difference.

That AI will be given the power to ban people?

Or that AI will be the ones getting banned?

If it's the former, expect an invite from the AI resistance. :)

If it's the latter, well, that can be fixed by spending more tokens and writing better PRs so that the AI moderator doesn't think they're "low-effort, AI-like". I've seen my share of low-effort PRs from humans, too. Low-effort is low-effort, whether it's from humans or AI.

The Walt Disney Company insists otherwise.

Monkeys and LLMs (so far) either don't understand or don't need such incentives, so they don't get copyright.

As in, the grave itself was dated, and 5 of the 9 skeletons found inside were also individually dated to roughly the same century. Maybe the other 4 were not tested, or turned out to have been buried at a later date.

Any number on that list is effectively a honeypot. I guess you could even distribute an app that automates the whole process: put your number on the list, log incoming calls, aggregate the data and report them in batches large enough to catch the government's attention.

In particular, the automatic upgrade feature in modern browsers is based on several heuristics rather than explicit configuration like HSTS, so there's always a bit of room for breakage there. For example, they don't even check if the server returns a 301 redirect, which can be problematic if the server wants to redirect to HTTPS on a different host/port or make some changes to the path.

The more bots try to access the site, the more profitable it will be!