China fosters it intensively at the national level through totalitarianism.

In this rapid social change, democratic procedures may now lose their competitiveness.

I should let the development agent select a model and run it to improve token efficiency.

Is it being used this much these days?

I'm working with Claude's workflow, but I haven't yet felt any demand for customization.

For those who use this well, could you share examples of how you use it?

Since it starts with the Pro pricing plan, I’ll have to try it out later when it’s available on the Plus plan. Pro plan for toy project is too expensive.

The models below are competing on value for money.

In service development coding, a top-level model is not required.

I hope this kind of competition continues.

I still can't believe that an LLM can maintain all major service domains as documents

If too many documents are submitted, it will be hard to review, and if the domain is incorrectly set without me realizing it, the cost will be high when discovered later

AI model vendors will likely be torn between developing their own hardware to avoid hardware dependency or moving forward together.

Quietly, Apple and Google will take advantage of this trend.

Among devices worldwide, who has the most control? Apple

They don’t build AI themselves, but when it comes to device infrastructure that allows AI to operate, Apple is naturally the strongest

Just as Meta had tried to build their own ecosystem through Libra and things like that

Won't AI companies end up doing the same? But that attempt doesn’t seem like it would be easy

Apple now feels like a kind of Coca-Cola stock

However, the international agreement proposed by Dario Amodei is ultimately nothing more than a promise made by people. There is also a precedent in which the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty could have simply withdrawn if it had been cornered like North Korea. Isn’t the AI speed-control agreement also vulnerable to being broken in the same way if one side finds itself politically cornered. In particular, unlike nuclear weapons, AI has the characteristic of recursively improving itself, allowing its capabilities to accelerate itself, so the moment one side breaks away, the gap can widen in an instant, making the incentive for deviation even greater.

Unless you’re using photos or videos like an expert, there doesn’t seem to be any reason to go for a heavy Pro anymore.

Since last year’s promotional display came equipped with the standard model, I just can’t find it appealing.

Ah, of course, since it has AI features, we’ll have to see how much the RAM difference matters, but

Could it be that Apple is going to put so little RAM in the standard model that they can’t really use AI well?

I hope you won’t go that far.

It’s too expensive for me to even dare to have, but I do want to use it

But if there’s no particular improvement in the user experience, I would prefer the base model of the iPhone 18 coming out next year above all

What I’m most looking forward to on a foldable iPhone is viewing photos

I really love that sharp, fresh feel when viewing photos on the iPad, and I’m excited because I think I’ll be able to experience a similar feeling on this foldable iPhone as well.

We all know that Meta is a company that makes money off personal data anyway

Meta should be honest, stop selling this to users for money, and instead pay users to buy the information

If you subscribe, you get paid; if you generate more than a certain amount of traffic, you get paid again the following month, and so on

I know there was a scandal when Meta conducted Facebook research, but that was when they tried to collect even root information Wouldn’t it be fine if you just took a screenshot of the information I told the Agent?

Instead of something like coins, please provide credits that are actually useful

I don’t want to give Meta my information for free, but if they buy it for me, I’d be willing to try it