<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: kleyd</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=kleyd</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 08:26:25 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=kleyd" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kleyd in "Context Is Software, Weights Are Hardware"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Your conclusion touches on this, but I think the brain analogy is stronger than the hardware/software dichotomy.<p>It is also my very uninformed intuition: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44910353">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44910353</a><p>Also interesting to think about: could a single system be generally intelligent, or is a certain bias actually a power. Can we have billions of models, each with their own "experience"</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 10:47:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47861664</link><dc:creator>kleyd</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47861664</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47861664</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kleyd in "Why XML tags are so fundamental to Claude"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The main benefit of using XML here seems to be that it forces clearer thinking and formulation from the user.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2026 22:25:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47211347</link><dc:creator>kleyd</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47211347</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47211347</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kleyd in "Turn Dependabot off"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The cooldown is to allow vulnerabilities to be discovered. So auto update on passing tests, which should include an npm audit check.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 23:19:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47095434</link><dc:creator>kleyd</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47095434</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47095434</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kleyd in "Vouch"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thought experiment: strip a forge down to what plain Git can't do: identity (who?), attestations (signed claims about a ref or actor), and policy (do these claims allow this ref update?).<p>With just those primitives, CI is a service that emits "ci/tested." Review emits "review/approved." A merge controller watches for sufficient attestations and requests a ref update. The forge kernel only evaluates whether claims satisfy policy.<p>Vouch shifts this even further left: attestations about people, not just code. "This person is trusted" is structurally the same kind of signed claim as "this commit passed CI." It gates participation itself, not just mergeability.<p>All this should ideally be part of a repo, not inside a closed platform like github. I like it and am curious to see where this stands in 5 years.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 23:01:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46939506</link><dc:creator>kleyd</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46939506</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46939506</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kleyd in "Dev-owned testing: Why it fails in practice and succeeds in theory"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ha, that's certainly a way to build things fool-proof.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 18:39:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46650160</link><dc:creator>kleyd</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46650160</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46650160</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kleyd in "Switch to Jujutsu Already: A Tutorial"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I believe this only works when there are no other uncommitted changes.<p>So you would need to stash after the fixup commit and pop the stash after rebase. Or use autostash.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 19:25:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45583757</link><dc:creator>kleyd</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45583757</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45583757</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kleyd in "Page Object (2013)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's not a trade-off of clarity just to save developers some extra typing. It's actually improving the clarity by bringing the thing you care about to the foreground: the getting started page having a table of contents with specific items.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 09:11:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45247668</link><dc:creator>kleyd</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45247668</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45247668</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kleyd in "All New Java Language Features Since Java 21"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I wouldn't dare say XML is better in this regard, but a good reason to be conservative with the use of annotations is exactly that cmd+clicking them doesn't easily lead to where the behavior is implemented.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2025 18:27:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45151684</link><dc:creator>kleyd</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45151684</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45151684</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kleyd in "Why LLMs can't really build software"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Current LLMs look a lot like a very advanced 'old brain' to me. While context engineering looks like optimizing the working memory.<p>What's missing is a part with more plasticity that can work in parallel and bi-directionally interact with the current static models in real-time.<p>This would mean individually trained models based on their experience so that knowledge is not translated to context, but to weight adjustments.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 09:44:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44910353</link><dc:creator>kleyd</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44910353</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44910353</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kleyd in "Getting good results from Claude Code"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That matches exactly my experience. Now there are a couple of prototypes to be finished, which still takes time. And higher priority tasks get delayed instead of sped up.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2025 19:56:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44857800</link><dc:creator>kleyd</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44857800</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44857800</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kleyd in "Getting good results from Claude Code"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Does anyone else find themselves starting projects that wouldn't otherwise be worth the time investment, while avoiding Claude Code for the tasks that actually have high priority?<p>Who has had success using Claude Code on features in older, bigger, messier projects?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 20:53:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44841590</link><dc:creator>kleyd</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44841590</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44841590</guid></item></channel></rss>