Or is this fundamentally a different model architecture, or a completely new tech stack on top of which this model was created (and the computing effort was actually less than before, in the v3 major relase?

To bid for lucrative defense contracts (and who knows what else from which organizations and governments).

Also, competitors are much less constrained by safety constraints, and slowly grabbing market share from them.

As mentioned by others: Enormous amounts of investor money at stake, pressure to generate revenue.

Next up: they will replace "safe" with "lethal" or "lethality" to be in sync with the current US administration.

I have also realized that I get faster and correct answer to the ascii_downcase question (even from GLM-4.7) when I submit to open.bigmodel.cn endpoint rather than the z.ai API endpoints (using the same API key). I get a mix of Chinese and Western characters in error responses from open.bigmodel.cn though, while the z.ai endpoint does only contain Western Characters.

(Just assuming that both websites are operated by the same company).

https://jqlang.org/manual/#ascii_downcase-ascii_upcase

However GLM-4.7 insists that is called ascii_down().

I tried to correct it and gave the exact version number, but still, after a long internal monologue, This is its final world:

"In standard jq version 1.7, the function is named ascii_down, not ascii_downcase.

If you are receiving an error that ascii_down is not defined, please verify your version with jq --version. It is possible you are using a different binary (like gojq) or a version older than 1."

GLM-5 gives me the correct answer, ascii_downcase, but I can get this in the Chat Window. Via the API I get HTTP Status 429 - too many requests.

Is Azure Linux relying on community contributions, and MS employees do not write code, justt review, plan, coordinate? Or is it the other way around, Microsoft developers do most of the work, and occasionally accept a small PR and interesting feature requests from the community, here and there?

(I encounter Type Checking only in my IDE when red squiggly lines appear under syntax errors etc. So consider this a layman Q)

[1] https://www.drugtopics.com/view/pharmacy-deserts-prominent-i...

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42723105

Points: 1

# Comments: 3

Or one of those companies who are really desperate to hire someone for whatever reason. Perhaps you can _take over_ such a business (search for "Nachfolger gesucht unternehmen")

It is not clear what your problem is. Has the freelancing side-business dried up, or is the "main day job" gone, or both?

It is also not clear what you are looking for.

(I know that pandoc is incredibly flexible.)

Rather there was one delegate from one of the many political groups in the EU Parliament (which has very little authority and power) who made a statement .

In analogy to the US political system: This is not Mark Zuckerberg summoned to a Senate hearing. Rather this is someone of the House of Representatives making some weird proposal or claim.

Maybe I am oversimplifying here, but you get the idea.

https://www.racket-lang.org/

- Heraldry - Lyre playing - Chariot race with foals - Chariot race with ten horses - Tragedy writing

(He won all of these competitions, of course, despite having crashed during chariot racing.)

Some classiications seem a bit ...nonintuitive. For example, the Autobiography of John Stuart Mill is classified as "very diffcult" whereas "The Tempest" by Shakespeare is classified as "fairly easy".

I would classify it the other way around, but what do I know, I'm a nonnative speaker anyway.