<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: knownothing</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=knownothing</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:40:58 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=knownothing" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by knownothing in "GitLab Ultimate and Gold now free for education and open source"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Exactly.<p>> If there's anything I want Gitlab to copy from GitHub, it's the opinionated decision making of what to show and when to show it.<p>Thing is, that will never happen. The project has already sprawled out of control and if they tried to remove things or drastically change the product users would just start forking the project. Or someone would copy GitLab and make a totally open source clone (that'd be ironic).<p>On a side note, does the issue tracker for GitLab CE worry anyone else? <a href="https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues" rel="nofollow">https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues</a> Nearly 11k issues some from 3 years ago.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 20:13:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17241573</link><dc:creator>knownothing</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17241573</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17241573</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by knownothing in "GitLab Ultimate and Gold now free for education and open source"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's right in their blog post, if you read it <a href="https://about.gitlab.com/2018/06/03/movingtogitlab/" rel="nofollow">https://about.gitlab.com/2018/06/03/movingtogitlab/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 19:42:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17241330</link><dc:creator>knownothing</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17241330</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17241330</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by knownothing in "GitLab Ultimate and Gold now free for education and open source"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>GitHub is popular because it allows developers to connect the tools they want to use to their repository. Some people find having everything in one package convenient, but the truth is there are better tools for most everything GitLab does. I don't see how jamming everything into one application makes it appealing.<p>I prefer GitHub's approach of allowing applications to deliver more information back into GitHub <a href="https://blog.github.com/2018-05-07-introducing-checks-api/" rel="nofollow">https://blog.github.com/2018-05-07-introducing-checks-api/</a> As the tooling we use becomes more complicated that will be the winning strategy.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 18:56:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17240872</link><dc:creator>knownothing</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17240872</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17240872</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by knownothing in "GitLab Ultimate and Gold now free for education and open source"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They are also paying people to Tweet. That's the only way for people to get a discount.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 18:39:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17240716</link><dc:creator>knownothing</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17240716</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17240716</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by knownothing in "GitLab Ultimate and Gold now free for education and open source"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>None of the things you listed are focused on usability, which is what OP complained about. Liking some isolated features of a product doesn't mean it's easy to use/understand or well-designed.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 18:37:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17240703</link><dc:creator>knownothing</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17240703</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17240703</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by knownothing in "Xcode 10 is now integrated with GitLab"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thing is it’s not even an exodus. It’s just a few thousand repos. And they aren’t even prepared to handle that. If there actually was a mass migration GitLab would completely fall over. I’m sure that would give folks a lot of confidence in the platform though.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 13:38:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17237441</link><dc:creator>knownothing</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17237441</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17237441</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by knownothing in "Xcode 10 is now integrated with GitLab"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah. This reeks of desperate and exaggerated marketing to me. Which is pretty much par for the course when it comes to anything GitLab says.<p>As others have said, support for two platforms was added. And GitHub was already supported. Guess that doesn’t make a great headline though.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 13:34:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17237414</link><dc:creator>knownothing</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17237414</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17237414</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by knownothing in "GitLab sees huge spike in project imports"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is pretty much par for course when it comes to GitLab marketing. Made up headlines that can't be supported with facts.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2018 05:42:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17224968</link><dc:creator>knownothing</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17224968</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17224968</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by knownothing in "GitLab sees huge spike in project imports"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'd like to point out that GitLab is not independent. They are owned by investors, including Google Ventures. So anyone who thinks they're giving GitHub/MS the finger by migrating their repos, please be ready to move everything again when GitLab disappoints you.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2018 02:27:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17224070</link><dc:creator>knownothing</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17224070</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17224070</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by knownothing in "Microsoft Is Said to Have Agreed to Acquire GitHub"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Um, have you actually tried doing anything about this? <a href="https://help.github.com/articles/searching-in-forks/" rel="nofollow">https://help.github.com/articles/searching-in-forks/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2018 02:03:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17223942</link><dc:creator>knownothing</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17223942</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17223942</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by knownothing in "Microsoft and GitHub have held acquisition talks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If the outcome is that they're adding more features to make the product better who cares? That's competition functioning as intended.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 21:53:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17210762</link><dc:creator>knownothing</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17210762</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17210762</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by knownothing in "A fork on GitHub is no fork"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Every user account and organization on GitHub can have unlimited collaborators on any number of public repositories.<p>From: <a href="https://help.github.com/articles/github-s-billing-plans/" rel="nofollow">https://help.github.com/articles/github-s-billing-plans/</a><p>So if your friend's repositories are all public no payment is required.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:25:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16601701</link><dc:creator>knownothing</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16601701</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16601701</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by knownothing in "A fork on GitHub is no fork"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://help.github.com/articles/backing-up-a-repository/" rel="nofollow">https://help.github.com/articles/backing-up-a-repository/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:13:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16601599</link><dc:creator>knownothing</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16601599</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16601599</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by knownothing in "GitHub shouldn't allow username reuse"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'd imagine all OAuth tokens associated with an account are rolled when it's transferred.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 23:26:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16344717</link><dc:creator>knownothing</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16344717</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16344717</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by knownothing in "Why Did a Billionaire Give $75M to a Philosophy Department?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Philosophy is important. The fact that you're even asking that question indicates a deep ignorance of the history of ideas and thought. It's also slightly absurd because empiricism is itself a philosophy.<p>Empiricism, as a method, became important because Bacon wanted to replace Aristotle's logic: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baconian_method" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baconian_method</a>. That took about 2000 years to happen, just to give you a sense of scale. And it's what helped spur the scientific revolution so it's also why we've got our little laptops and Facebook today.<p>The scientific revolution and scientific method are a branch off of a long, long conversation about the world, the nature of it, and how we should understand it.<p>Now, that's not to say there's not a lot of silly, useless garbage being put out under the guise of "philosophy". That's definitely the case. The challenge is identifying productive or useful parts and using them in a coherent manner.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 19:08:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16276572</link><dc:creator>knownothing</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16276572</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16276572</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by knownothing in "Orcas can imitate human speech, research reveals"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Interesting. If I was a sailor hundreds of years ago and witnessed something like that I might think it was a merman.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 17:43:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16275734</link><dc:creator>knownothing</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16275734</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16275734</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by knownothing in "U.S. Regulators to Subpoena Crypto Exchange Bitfinex, Tether"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Good luck finding a counterparty.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 19:41:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16268290</link><dc:creator>knownothing</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16268290</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16268290</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by knownothing in "Chinese Workers Abandon Silicon Valley for Riches Back Home"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thanks, I'll take a look.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 22:42:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16128767</link><dc:creator>knownothing</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16128767</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16128767</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by knownothing in "Induction of self awareness in dreams through low current stimulation (2014)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You're definitely not alone. It makes sense on an intuitive level. Even when you "close" your eyes, you can't stop yourself from seeing. You're simply staring at the inside of your eyelids.<p>EDIT: I had not heard of the Ganzfield effect before, although I was familiar with the phenomenon itself. It does seem like this a manifestation of what they're referring to. As a side note, in sensory deprivation situations you also become keenly aware of the sound of your heart beating and the sound of your blood circulating in your veins. It's very odd.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 22:17:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16128558</link><dc:creator>knownothing</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16128558</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16128558</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by knownothing in "Peter Thiel submits bid for Gawker"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's a concerning trend. Another strange example: <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-la-weekly-20171129-story.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-la-weekly-20171129-sto...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 22:02:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16128431</link><dc:creator>knownothing</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16128431</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16128431</guid></item></channel></rss>