[1]https://ss64.com/mac/mdfind.html

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novo_Nordisk_Foundation

Did the culture around questions change compared with working from a shared office?

It's a very nice set-up for high quality results and makes it hard for them to be corrupted.

The closest U.S. equivalent is probably consumer reports

-Nordstream 2 has a capacity to transport 55 billion cubic meters per year[1]

-The biggest LNG transport ship "Mozah" built by Samsung Heavy Industries can transport a equivalent of ~162 million cubic meters in a single load

This leads to a ~339,5 full loads per year needed to replace the pipeline volume. Nordstream 2 probably wouldn't run at full capacity initially but even at 50% utilisation it would be nearly impossibe to replace it with shipping.

[1]https://www.gazprom.com/projects/nord-stream2/

[2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozah

[1]https://store.steampowered.com/app/252950/Rocket_League/

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VARTA

[2]https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/AirPods+Pro+Teardown/127551 look at step 8

[3]mentioned in the same article and step as the Airpods above

I had the great pleasure of visiting a school based on that model and it allowed a lot of flexibility for students. In my instance there were 4+ hours of "Free-work" blocks everyday, where we could work on whatever we wanted, we just had to make sure we finished certain (personalised) workloads by the end of the week. Pacing and what we wanted to do with our time if we finished early was up to us as a student and we could work on more advanced topics. Students were also encouraged to ask older members of the mixed age class if we got stuck, which made most students quite good at explaining topics to each other while giving older or more advanced students something to do if they didn't want to advance further in their own studies.

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montessori_education

I am by no means an "in the know" on Chip design and this whole bit is probably a fair bit of speculation, but I remember Jim Keller talking about the ending of Moores law on a podcast in February[1]. If I remember correctly his argument boiled down to the theory, that Moores law is in some sense a self fulfilling prophecy. You need to have every part of your company believing in it, or else the parts stop meshing into one another well. I.e. if a team doesn't believe that they will get reach a density/size improvement, that would allow them to use more transistors in their design they will need to cut down and adjust their plans to that new reality. If this distrust in improvement spreads inside of a company, it would in turn lead to a steeper slowdown in overall improvement.

And while there may be an industry-wide slowdown at the current point in time, perhaps this dynamic is exacerbated at intel, causing them to loose their competitive edge over the past years.

[1]https://youtu.be/Nb2tebYAaOA?t=1805 (Timestamped to the beginning of Topic of Moores law slowing down)