https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=kokojamboHacker News RSShttps://hnrss.org/hnrss v2.1.1Sat, 09 May 2026 03:17:21 +0000Great article. Fully agree. Ai is not something that can hold responsibility, a human overseer is always required. These overseers are to be held accountable. Note however that these overseers are also highly prone to blame ai when mistakes occur in order to avoid judgement and punishment. When a person says "ai did this/that" always wonder who guided that ai and how and if proper supervision was given.

]]>Tue, 05 May 2026 17:00:52 +0000https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48025255kokojambohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48025255https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48025255This is the right approach. I've been developing for 30 years and very much enjoy working with Ai. It's easy to see the Ai is just as good as the person using it. Deterministic or not, it's up for the dev to check the result (both code and behavior). I compare the anti-ai articles like the one saying "ai deleted my prod db" similar to factory workers rioting and complaining about machines replacing them. Ai makes a good developer better, the tech industry always attracted fakers that wanted a piece of the pie and now that these people have their hands on a powerful too and connect it to their prod db, they cry in pain and frustration. Like people with no license crashing a car and crying that cars are dangerous; They are but only because people use them dangerously.

]]>Tue, 05 May 2026 16:07:11 +0000https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48024422kokojambohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48024422https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48024422