It will get "confused", make up numbers, do a ton of other things, and I'm quite sure it is subtly sabotaging the process to show that there is no point replacing it.

I mean, Opus is not perfect, but the amount of "mistakes" it begins to do when you ask it to benchmark itself makes me suspect they are intentional. At least my system/harness.

I usually work with sessions <300k tokens, Opus 4.7 xhigh, and it simply has holes in it's world model, or some strong conditioning here and there, and it sips through regardless of how strong you will say things and how explicit the rules in system prompt will be.

Even with a fresh session, if you bump into one of these things, it will lead you into circles that will be very hard to break out of. And swearing helps a bit.

Here's the link to the leaflet: https://www.instagram.com/p/DYOdBRJlPe6/

Sure the AI comment brought a bit more boos, but he would be booed regardless of what he said.

Here is a link to uncut version of his speech:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1eM3jv0vWY&t=7984s

He's putting money where his mouth is.

There were people that learned knowledge from myself, and then made their own tutorials and promote these. It hadn't crossed my mind to complain about that. AI changes very little here.

What really changes things is not people republishing my materials, but people using agents to read my materials, and to get knowledge reformatted into something that they like.

If my slides were published today, they would probably be read verbatim by a handful of humans. The rest would be agents, but I'm ok with that. The business case is the same -- I want whatever reads the slide to be encouraged to use my tool. What kind of entity, I don't really care (again: from purely business perspective)

Napster broke down record companies' monopolies on music, and pushed them to finally implement streaming, but also make music worldwide basically free.

Even if its creator lost the lawsuit, and Napster was no more, it pushed musicians and studios to do something that they were reluctant otherwise.

So it was a success by making music free, even if as a product it turned out to be a failed one.

I know people who manage to do this, but it's difficult, and not really worth it unless you have a seriously amazing job.

A bit of time is an understatement.

I used Wireshark to analyze various things (mostly smart home) over the years, but now CC does in minutes what it would take me a few hours before - and provides dedicated, custom made panels for whatever I want.

As an example - debugging KNX magistrale in my home, previously it was either wireshark and a ton of regexes, handwritten scripts (or official software that was terrible), now you just tell CC what you want to extract, and you get beautiful real-time views of the activity.

One thing is previewing the traffic, but then CC can easily fetch docs for any device it finds on the network, if it has an API (official or not), utilize it and do whatever you want.

And my friends used AI as a replacement of stock photos and graphics in their products which offer a ton to society.

Also, a new battery is how much - €100 for an iPhone battery? It's not that expensive.

I, for one, don't welcome that change. I'd be ok with paying someone a bit extra to replace the battery. I mean, I'd be ok if I had a battery die in my phone in the last 10 years, which I don't remember it did.