<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: kpw94</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=kpw94</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 08:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=kpw94" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kpw94 in "What's the best programming language for coding agents?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Interesting project.<p>2 gut feeling concerns:<p>- Strict subset of go might be confusing to an agent actually (trying to use unavailable go features)<p>- So -> c11 source to source compile loop might be confusing to agent: if So compiles to c11 does it guarantee c11 program compiles. If runtime exception (segfault etc), is it going to be easy for agent to map that back to original So code?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 17:29:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49261600</link><dc:creator>kpw94</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49261600</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49261600</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kpw94 in "What's the best programming language for coding agents?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Agree that go is the best due to its main design goal: A language that's simple for any programmer fitting that definition <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30688969">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30688969</a>.<p>> "They’re not capable of understanding a brilliant language but we want to use them to build good software. So, the language that we give them has to be easy for them to understand and easy to adopt."<p>This makes it a great language not just for young Googlers programmers, but also for LLM Agents!<p>IMO, the next big language will be similar philosophy, but without garbage collection. (is Zig the closest to filling that niche?)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 04:30:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49253396</link><dc:creator>kpw94</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49253396</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49253396</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[YC: Requests for Startups – Fall 2026]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.ycombinator.com/rfs">https://www.ycombinator.com/rfs</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49048742">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49048742</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 16:01:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.ycombinator.com/rfs</link><dc:creator>kpw94</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49048742</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49048742</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kpw94 in "Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta warn against overregulating open-weight models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> OpenAI and Anthropic, which are gearing up for potentially massive IPOs, did not sign the letter.<p>Not anymore, OpenAI did sign it:<p><a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/corporate-responsibility/topics/open-weight/" rel="nofollow">https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/corporate-responsibility/top...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 05:09:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49044701</link><dc:creator>kpw94</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49044701</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49044701</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Vinod Khosla to Buy Seattle Seahawks for $9.6B]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.sportico.com/business/team-sales/2026/seattle-seahawks-sale-vinod-khosla-owner-billions-1234938616/">https://www.sportico.com/business/team-sales/2026/seattle-seahawks-sale-vinod-khosla-owner-billions-1234938616/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48878666">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48878666</a></p>
<p>Points: 23</p>
<p># Comments: 10</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 05:48:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.sportico.com/business/team-sales/2026/seattle-seahawks-sale-vinod-khosla-owner-billions-1234938616/</link><dc:creator>kpw94</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48878666</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48878666</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kpw94 in "Price per 1M tokens is meaningless"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah definitely. I've recently commented on that: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48557890">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48557890</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 22:38:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811421</link><dc:creator>kpw94</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811421</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811421</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kpw94 in "Price per 1M tokens is meaningless"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In the context of local LLMs on limited hardware I've ran to the exact same conclusion: "tok/s" isn't the most useful metric when my personal North star metric, given my fixed hardware is: Model smart enough to execute my goals _in the minimum amount of time_.<p>Some models I tried (Mistral I think) had better tok/s, and roughly same billion parameters / scores on various benchmark... But they were _so_ verbose, that they generated many more tokens compared to a Qwen model of same caliber to answer the same thing.<p>So even though it had better generated tok/s, because so many more were generated, the clock time was longer.<p>And this compounds over mutli-turns: more generated token means more context used in the next turn (until some compaction or something runs)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 20:46:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48810299</link><dc:creator>kpw94</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48810299</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48810299</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kpw94 in "Qwen 3.6 27B is the sweet spot for local development"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> What it does:<p>><p>> --jinja for tool calling support<p>Pretty sure this flag hasn't done anything for a while. It's enabled by default since ~November of last year</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 17:32:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722290</link><dc:creator>kpw94</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722290</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722290</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kpw94 in "Show HN: I made Google Trends for Hacker News by indexing 18 years of comments"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The huge spike of "lk-99" in science & frontier tech is amusing...<p>This is cool concept, would love a positive/negative sentiment computed for each comment that refers to a given word, so you can see trends of "cloudflare (positive)" vs "cloudflare (negative)" where first one counts comments only if sentiment confidence is greater than say 0.6 and the other one counts comments only if sentiment is less than 0.4 (assuming [0,1] sentiment score)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 16:22:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48675696</link><dc:creator>kpw94</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48675696</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48675696</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Mom Who Runs a Household with a Staff of AI Agents]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.thecut.com/article/jesse-genet-ai-agents-household.html">https://www.thecut.com/article/jesse-genet-ai-agents-household.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48576233">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48576233</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 20:17:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.thecut.com/article/jesse-genet-ai-agents-household.html</link><dc:creator>kpw94</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48576233</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48576233</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kpw94 in "Running local models is good now"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thanks! Super helpful.<p>I do use it the same way as you're describing on personal projects at home, in a very crude manner (pasting code snippets in llama server web UI prompt. Next will attempt OpenCode)<p>At work I use it in similar manner with more mature tools, but the vast majority of token spend comes from a totally different workflow: "pretend the AI is a fleet of junior/intern engineer you're delegating work to", where the agent will on its own do the implementation, commit the changes etc.<p>It does indeed spend a lot of tokens wandering the codebase, talking to MCPs, loading skills etc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 17:21:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48558655</link><dc:creator>kpw94</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48558655</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48558655</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kpw94 in "Running local models is good now"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> About the generation speed: ~100-150 t/s on the RTX 5090 and ~40 t/s on the Mac<p>Curious if you can share the prefill speed too?<p>I run locally on a crappy desktop (some AMD iGPU with Vulkan llama.cpp, 32 GB DDR4 RAM) for experimentation. I get 15 tok/s on generation for the qwen & gemma4 MoE models. I get around 150 tok/s prefill speed.<p>Reason I'm asking about the prefill is looking at my stats at work, I use between 20M to peaks of 300M input tokens daily. Some of those token are cached but in general, I seem to have roughly 500x more input tokens than output. So interested in prefill tok/s stats.<p>Huge Thank you for llama.cpp btw!!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 16:33:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48557890</link><dc:creator>kpw94</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48557890</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48557890</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kpw94 in "Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>  gemma (unsloth/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF) models<p>Since you're running quantized (at UD-Q4_K_XL) , check out the "qat" models (unsloth/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-qat-GGUF) !<p>- <a href="https://huggingface.co/unsloth/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-qat-GGUF" rel="nofollow">https://huggingface.co/unsloth/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-qat-GGUF</a>
(With "Jun 9 Update: Added MTP support.")<p>- <a href="https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/developers-tools/quantization-aware-training-gemma-4/" rel="nofollow">https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/developers-...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 18:53:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48545489</link><dc:creator>kpw94</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48545489</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48545489</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kpw94 in "Fox to buy Roku"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I did the opposite switch:<p>In ~2015 got an Xbox one, as a media center it was an awesome experience:<p>Kinect voice control to play/pause and other things way before Google home/Amazon echo ecosystem were mature.<p>Free OTA channels via TV tuner and well designed OneGuide (with ability to pause and rewind).<p>And of course all the Netflix and other apps, Plex server etc.<p>But strategically it seems Microsoft decided they wanted to look more like Playstation, focused on gaming (at that time paid Xbox live subscription vs free Playstation)<p>And as gaws points out, they seem to recently announce to double down on the gaming stuff.<p>So when they discontinued OneGuide. I picked Roku since they seem to be focused on the media experience primarily... but unsure how I feel about this acquisition news.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 16:46:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48543903</link><dc:creator>kpw94</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48543903</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48543903</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kpw94 in "How to earn a billion dollars"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> What's hard to figure out here?<p>Negative externalities are hard to figure out.<p>Since parent mentions "toxic byproduct": Say you're the company that invented Teflon pans. you made billions. You saved billions in time for all the users of the pans... A true entrepreneurial success.<p>But, by how many billions did you fuck up the environment, people's health etc with the spread of PFAS everywhere?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 23:20:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48534109</link><dc:creator>kpw94</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48534109</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48534109</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Andrej Karpathy Joins Anthropic]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://twitter.com/i/status/2056753169888334312">https://twitter.com/i/status/2056753169888334312</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48195291">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48195291</a></p>
<p>Points: 19</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 16:12:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://twitter.com/i/status/2056753169888334312</link><dc:creator>kpw94</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48195291</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48195291</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kpw94 in "Waymo updates 3,800 robotaxis after they 'drive into standing water'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That seems a very risky assumption for any car (self driving or human driver) during flash floods. "Turn around don't drown":<p>You think you know how deep it is under because you've taken that road many times before (or in your case you have historical laser measurement)<p>But you don't know:<p>- Maybe the road under fully collapsed<p>- Maybe the flow of water is extremely strong, so you need to accurately estimate that too.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 18:53:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152386</link><dc:creator>kpw94</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152386</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48152386</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kpw94 in "European Stagnation Is Real"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> And the author is correct (while the phrasing is a bit weird.)<p>Right, that's just a description of the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baumol_effect" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baumol_effect</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 16:26:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124064</link><dc:creator>kpw94</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124064</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124064</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kpw94 in "Accelerating Gemma 4: faster inference with multi-token prediction drafters"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Speculative execution techniques in software & hardware exist everywhere,<p>- Speculative multi threading<p>- Data Value Speculation<p>- Speculative Memory Disambiguation<p>- Runahead Execution<p>- Speculative Prefetching<p>- Multi-path (Dual-path) Execution (goes beyond branch prediction by computing both paths)<p>- Optimistic Concurrency Control (for database transactions etc)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 16:44:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038350</link><dc:creator>kpw94</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038350</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48038350</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by kpw94 in "Scores decline again for 13-year-old students in reading and mathematics (2023)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My non-controversial theory: It's all the attention-span-shortening stuff.<p>- tech apps starting with infinite scroll (facebook, 9gag, Instagram, etc.)<p>- media/tech shortened content: shorter tv shows, short video content, etc.<p>(Tiktok is the "state of the art" of those 2 trends pushed to the max)<p>Specifically, we're getting more & more addicted to things that increase the dopamine spikes frequency, making it increasingly difficult to go in deep focus work.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 19:58:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47868480</link><dc:creator>kpw94</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47868480</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47868480</guid></item></channel></rss>