Pre-iPhone and during the mechanical-disk iPod era, they were a very small and vulnerable entity.

This is clearly 16 bit.

Switching from ASM to C for videogames defined the 16 bit and 32 bit eras.

Switching to C++ defined the (roughly) Xbox and PS2, PS3 eras.

Snow Leopard was the first to integrate iOS's CoreAnimation framework. Nearly all animations now are based on that. Before, the CPU manually updated the sizes and positions of things, frame by frame, in a loop. This is how you'd program a Game Engine.

After, with CA, state-change property models are sent to a different process entirely which does its own interpolation to animate the UI at a higher thread-priority than any other process in the operating system. This is fantastic if maintaining 60+ FPS at all times, even on an iPhone 1 or 3G with less power than you'd have in today's AirPod chips, was a central requirement. (And it was, the first iPhones dominated their competitors in terms of input latency and framerate)

But programming CoreAnimation is much more complicated and easy to make mistakes in if you want "every frame perfect". Trust me, I made a lot of the animations that shipped in iOS 7 (the Calendar app is full of them, OS level transitions for the core chome elements of iOS). It took nearly a year of meticulousness to get things looking ok. In the years since I left the company, I've noticed these transitions get more and more janky and buggy and full of artifacts. Clearly, whoever replaced me doesn't have the same eye and sense of craft. Oh well.

Psychological time is your own weights being updated in response to stimuli and internal processing.

When there isn't anything interesting happening, no updates are needed, and you don't perceive much time. That's why there's a logarithmic effect on the "density" of time as you age.

We genuinely don't understand what your post is about. What is this tool? What are these numbers representative? Why are things sorted in that order?

You haven't communicated really anything at all. I am interested, I'd like to understand. Write a more complete post, please.

So it's as relevant and baked-in to today as actual 80s synth-culture was in 2000.

Software used to be made by Programmers, with taste and opinions, according to their talent and personality, in solo or small groups. Now they are run by Project Managers and Data Scientists chasing KPIs through engagement measurement tools and AB tests.

Fun easter eggs cannot be justified. They are cut. Personality doesn't move the metric as much as the mean / common denominator most basic thing. That's what ships.

All software and web content has gone this way in the last 13 years or so.