<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: ksmxksmxkwj</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=ksmxksmxkwj</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 08:58:51 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=ksmxksmxkwj" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ksmxksmxkwj in "GPT-6 Astra Solves a WWI German Radio Cipher"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If it’s a trend on social media than it’s most likely staged for some views or happens to a very little, very niche and irrelevant share of people and is being blown out of proportion because… you guessed it: views.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 13:28:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49766461</link><dc:creator>ksmxksmxkwj</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49766461</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49766461</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ksmxksmxkwj in "GPT-6 Astra Solves a WWI German Radio Cipher"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That’s a lot of words just to say “but modern AIs have access to more data”. Why overcomplicate prose? To sound smarter?<p>Still, OP’s argument still holds even if AIs today have much more data to rely upon.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 13:21:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49766405</link><dc:creator>ksmxksmxkwj</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49766405</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49766405</guid></item></channel></rss>