<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: ksudb</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=ksudb</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 08:24:23 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=ksudb" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ksudb in "U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There's control and there's enough control so not a single missile can hit a cargo ship in the strait.<p>Maritime insurers are understandably conservative. If the ship stays trapped it continues to pay premiums (insurance company wins). If it risks passage it risks a $10M payout (insurance company loses). If there's risk of a single missile the insurers won't allow the ships through. How can an insurance company thousands of miles away stop a ship? "If you risk the passage you're not covered by insurance"<p>Pretty sure Iran has spent the last 30 years ensuring that they can mount gorilla attacks indefinitely in the face of overwhelming invasion.<p>That has been their deterrent strategy for decades. Intelligence analysts out front should have told ya.<p>(A massive invasion would also not open the strait.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 15:18:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49170207</link><dc:creator>ksudb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49170207</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49170207</guid></item></channel></rss>