however I could dig out the references to it. Apparently it was a course by Prof. Alex Aiken and karpathy was a TA.

This repository seems to be a future version of the same course. https://github.com/gboduljak/stanford-compilers-coursework

Edit: found the videos from the course on the archive https://archive.org/details/academictorrents_e31e54905c7b266...

The course I did was organized perfectly with big parts of compiler boiler plate already written, and I only had to implement parser/lexer rules and the translation of language structures into assembly instructions. Also it was a compiler for a language designed just for this course with the intention of it being specifically easy to write a compiler for it and not programming.

Without this I can imagine it being a painful experience

One of them was a compilers course done by karpathy. It was pure joy and a great learning experience.

Also in my experience the joy of doing a course was much stronger correlated with the teacher's qualities rather than the subject itself.

The ads are only good in a context when I'm searching for particular product.

When I'm trying to do my work then any ad that takes my attention has negative value.

Show me the same ad when I'm actually searching for a new vacuum cleaner and we're fine.

you also claim that I am lying.

Are you willing to put money to be proven wrong? that it's normal to have a tech discussion with your doctor in Switzerland?

"Your claimed experience is different than my experience so you are lying"?

I mean the story might be fake obviously, but is definitely plausible.

There are plenty of small medical practices with 1-2 doctors and a front desk.

On my last visit i actually casually discussed their IT system with a doctor.

It's a rarely updated personal blog, not a daily tabloid story.

Getting good at juggling makes things fall down noticeably slower. But despite getting really good at juggling, I haven't observed any other super powers.

You needed supercomputer to win in chess until you didn't.

Currently local models performance in natural language is much better than any algorithm running on a super computer cluster just few years ago.

I would bet against him being able to learn three balls.

But he was very dedicated. Long story short. After many years he could comfortably juggle 6 (six!) balls.

It looked wobbly, he still looked like a person without coordination, but the balls somehow stayed in the air.

The GP has described a task which feels like a task very well within intended usage of CC, but can easily eat up the usage limit.

What should we read between the lines about this scenario?

Is it a bannable offense?

And in an unlikely scenario that the train is late, everyone will agree that it's a valid circumstance.

Gemma 3 was the first model that I have liked enough to use a lot just for daily questions on my 32G gpu.

Culturally from a young age we're told to not trust our guts and a lot of people shut them off.

"Don't judge a book by the cover", "you don't even know him". We're told to ignore our gut feeling especially if that feeling is consistent with negative stereotypes.

It's much easier to manage 3 people with better tools than to manage 9 people even if their output would be the same

Also I don't know if it came with manual but my English wasn't good enough to read them anyways.

When I was learning programming I had no internet, no books outside of library, nobody to ask for days.

I remember vividly having spent days trying to figure out how to use the stdlib qsort, and not being able to.