<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: l72</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=l72</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 19:38:26 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=l72" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by l72 in "Jira Is Turing-Complete"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We approach tickets that match with our development strategy. A ticket is tied to and represents a branch of code. When that code is merged the ticket is done. It cannot be reopened, you open a new ticket and link it and there will be a new branch.<p>I know everything that is in our main branch by looking at jira.<p>Product mangers and executives often want a very different view or workflow and it is hard to bend jira to work for everyone. Jira would need to have things like parallel workflows on a ticket and that would just get confusing and complicated.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 18:07:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48269831</link><dc:creator>l72</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48269831</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48269831</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by l72 in "Jira Is Turing-Complete"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I find the problem is that engineering wants one work flow, product wants another, another department wants theirs, and so on.<p>As a CTO I have declared that Jira is owned by engineering and it is our developers’ process.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 14:36:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48267371</link><dc:creator>l72</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48267371</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48267371</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by l72 in "The quiet renovation at Bitwarden"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’ve found being able to share passwords with my spouse very valuable which we couldn’t easily do with keepass. Also the syncing strategy on iOS is a disaster and corrupted my wife’s keepass db causing her to lose everything.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 23:18:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187205</link><dc:creator>l72</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187205</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187205</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by l72 in "The Quiet Renovation at Bitwarden"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I mean does it? I have set it up before but I just set it up for my new small office team. I already had an internal server and WireGuard vpn in our office and it took 2 minutes to create a quadlet to run vaultwarden and a few more to configure it. The “hardest” part was training the team on how to use collections.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 23:14:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187165</link><dc:creator>l72</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187165</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187165</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by l72 in "The quiet renovation at Bitwarden"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It’s a bad strategy. I am capable so I host an instance of vaultwarden for myself and spouse (only available via our vpn)<p>But when friends and family ask for my recommendation I send them to Bitwarden and they pay for the service.<p>If it wasn’t for vaultwarden and the clients being open source I would not be using it nor recommending it.<p>I’d probably still be using keepass with manual sync and when friends and family ask for suggestions I’d probably shrug and say I don’t trust any of them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 23:10:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187133</link><dc:creator>l72</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187133</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187133</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by l72 in "The fun has been optimized out of the Internet"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For me, what has really changed is the feeling of having community on the Internet.<p>In the 90s, I had:<p><pre><code>    Instant Messenger with people I knew
    IRC channels for interests
    Forums for specific topics
    A Web Ring for my James Bond website
</code></pre>
Back then, the Internet felt like an actual place I went to. I would sit down at the computer, dial up, and enter a space that had boundaries. When I was done, I left, and that separation made the time I spent there feel focused and real. You couldn't take it with you, and that was a feature, not a bug.<p>In the 2000s, we had:<p><pre><code>    Social Media (Facebook), where you actually talked to people you knew and shared experiences with them
</code></pre>
It hadn't yet become a content distribution machine. It was still a tool for connection.<p>All of this still exists, but it just doesn't feel the same. I don't think it's simply because I grew up, or because I'm looking back with rose-colored glasses. And I don't think it's just because these spaces became ghost towns as people consolidated into a few large networks. The architecture changed. The Internet stopped being a destination and became a layer on top of real life that never turns off. Somewhere along the way, the business model shifted from helping people talk to each other to extracting as much attention as possible, and you can feel that in every interaction.<p>Maybe that's why something is missing.<p>Facebook now has too many connections, and is just designed for resharing and getting people to doom scroll. There's no real interaction with your friends anymore. It became a broadcast network pretending to be a living room.<p>On Reddit, I feel like the community is way too big. I don't know who I am talking to and have no connection with anyone on there, even for things that should be local, like my city's subreddit. It feels less like a neighborhood and more like a stadium where thousands of people are shouting over each other.<p>Hacker News feels the closest to a community, but it is still too big. I have never made a single personal connection here, so I don't even know what I am contributing to. It all just feels faceless and bland.<p>We still have "Instant Messaging", but my biggest issue is they are pretty much all tied to a phone and "always online." I have zero interest in having a long back-and-forth conversation on that medium, especially now that there is no status of the other people. Back in the day, you were online or not online, and that boundary created a kind of ritual. A conversation could actually be instant and FOCUSED because you both showed up to the same place at the same time. Now it's just a slow conversation over days that randomly interrupts what you are doing. The persistence feels more like an obligation than a hangout.<p>Most forums feel dead. IRC just isn't the same anymore, and I really dislike being locked into Discord or other proprietary platforms. Matrix bridging has been a godsend, but isn't perfect. I know these small communities haven't completely vanished, but they have been buried. In the old days, you found them through webrings and serendipity. Now you have to dig for them on purpose, and most people never will. My long time friends don't use them anymore, so they aren't useful in connecting to people I already have relationships with.<p>The Internet just doesn't feel connected or fun anymore.<p>Don't get me wrong, being able to do research and find information on the internet is better than it has ever been, and I am grateful for that. But the Internet seems to have split in two: it became an incredible tool for finding information, and a terrible tool for sustaining relationships. The Internet was touted as a place for connection, and I feel like that part is long gone. Or if it still exists somewhere, it's hiding in small corners that the algorithms never show us, while the rest of the web is optimized for engagement instead of actually being together.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 16:39:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48024925</link><dc:creator>l72</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48024925</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48024925</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by l72 in "Mercedes-Benz commits to bringing back physical buttons"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have Raynaud's which causes loss of circulation in my fingertips even when the weather isn't that cold (so even in a car with the heat on). Then this happens, touch screens do not register correctly, and I end up having to use a knuckle or do what my sister does and use the tip of the nose</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 16:09:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47998371</link><dc:creator>l72</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47998371</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47998371</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by l72 in "The feed doesn't know you, and YouTube refuses to let you browse"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I find youtube's interface so incredibly frustrating and hostile. Even when I know what I want to watch, I find it very hard to actually get to it. On their Roku app, search for The Daily Show, and try and watch the latest clips. It doesn't show them in that order and browsing the clips is frustratingly hard. Their web interface, especially mobile, is equally as bad.<p>I've given up on trying to use youtube's interface and now just rely on recommendations + rss (via freshrss) or tubearchivist to keep me up to date and organize the videos.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 13:10:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47986107</link><dc:creator>l72</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47986107</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47986107</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by l72 in "City Learns Flock Accessed Cameras in Children's Gymnastics Room as a Sales Demo"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The problem isn't having cameras. Its that these cameras should be closed circuit with data residing locally, not being sent to a 3rd party that has full access to the video streams, and who processes them, combines them with other parties, resells data from them, or hands them over without a warrant!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47980325</link><dc:creator>l72</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47980325</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47980325</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by l72 in "City Learns Flock Accessed Cameras in Children's Gymnastics Room as a Sales Demo"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We are opening up a wellness clinic and we were planning to use a managed service company for internet, network, and security. I was appalled by the managed services suggestions. Privacy of our patients and their data is critical, and the managed service company wants to send all of our feeds to third parties and give third parties direct access to our network.<p>We decided this was a privacy and security risk, and have gone in a completely different direction, but it would not surprise me if most businesses used one of these companies and just went with whatever they suggested without understanding at all what is at stake or who has access to the data.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 20:57:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47980213</link><dc:creator>l72</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47980213</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47980213</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by l72 in "Before GitHub"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Same, then moved to bazaar which was really easy and nice.<p>Of course moved on to git but I still think bazaar did many things better.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:10:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47947883</link><dc:creator>l72</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47947883</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47947883</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by l72 in "Your phone is about to stop being yours"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My Android is running Lineage without Google Play Services (no microg either).<p>I had an app that I needed to use, and the only available log-in method was via firebase's SMS. Firebase flat out refused to allow me to login because of Google Play Integrity, and there was no web only option.<p>I ended up having to use my spouse's iPhone...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 18:38:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47938605</link><dc:creator>l72</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47938605</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47938605</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by l72 in "jj – the CLI for Jujutsu"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If git would change two defaults, that would make me really happy:<p><pre><code>  1. git merge ONLY does merges (no fast forward/rebase). git pull ONLY does a fast forward
  2. git log by default is git log --first-parent. Just show commits where the parent is the current branch. This makes the merge workflow really easy to understand an linear, because in the end, you only care about commits on the trunk.</code></pre></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 13:42:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47765555</link><dc:creator>l72</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47765555</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47765555</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by l72 in "Git commands I run before reading any code"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If your goal here is to have linear history, then just use a merge commit when merging the PR to main and always use `git log --first-parent`. That will only show commits directly on main, and gives you a clean, linear history.<p>If you want to dig down into the subcommits from a merge, then you still can. This is useful if you are going back and bisecting to find a bug, as those individual commits may hold value.<p>You can also cherry pick or rollback the single merge commit, as it holds everything under it as a single unit.<p>This avoids changing history, and importantly, allows stacked PRs to exist cleanly.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 16:38:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692614</link><dc:creator>l72</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692614</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692614</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by l72 in "Git commands I run before reading any code"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We do. If we are building out a feature, none of its code is merged into main until it is complete (if this is a big feature, we milestone into mergeable and releasable units).<p>The feature is represented by a Story in Jira and a feature branch for that story. Subtasks in jira are created and multiple developers can pick up the different subtasks. There is a personal branch per subtasks, and PRs are put up against the feature branch. Those subtasks are code reviewed, tested, and merged into the feature branch.<p>In the end, it is the feature branch that is merged (as a single merge commit and complete unit) into main, and may well have had contributions from multiple people.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 16:34:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692550</link><dc:creator>l72</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692550</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692550</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by l72 in "Git commands I run before reading any code"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I really, really wish git changed two defaults:<p><pre><code>  * git merge ALWAYS does a merge and git pull ALWAYS does a fast forward.
  * git log --first-parent is the default. Have a git log --deep if you want to go down into branches.
</code></pre>
If you use a workflow that always merges a PR with a merge commit, then git log --first-parent gives you a very nice linear history. I feel like if this was the default, so many arguments about squashing or rebasing workflows wouldn't be necessary to get our "linear history", everyone would just be doing merges and be happy with it. You get a clean top level history and you can dig down into the individual commits in a merge if you are bisecting for a bug.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 16:31:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692486</link><dc:creator>l72</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692486</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47692486</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by l72 in "Microsoft hasn't had a coherent GUI strategy since Petzold"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why don't we have more great UI toolkits for the canvas?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 13:58:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47661035</link><dc:creator>l72</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47661035</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47661035</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by l72 in "My Google Workspace account suspension"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They could switch their domain to another email provider and start getting emails, which is great. The problem though, is they also used their Google Account to log in to all the 3rd party services (payroll). I have no idea how you would get back into those services. Some _might_ let you switch off the Google Sign-in SSO, but I imagine that is a headache.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 15:00:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650124</link><dc:creator>l72</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650124</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47650124</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by l72 in "Show HN: I built a frontpage for personal blogs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Isn't that that point of POSSE[1]? Host your blog, post a link to it on social sites like Mastodon, and let the conversation happen on Mastodon.<p>[1] <a href="https://indieweb.org/POSSE" rel="nofollow">https://indieweb.org/POSSE</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 15:54:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628241</link><dc:creator>l72</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628241</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628241</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by l72 in "Show HN: I built a frontpage for personal blogs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I always thought the "planets"[1][2][3] were a neat idea. I wish there were more of them for dedicated topics. Then I can just subscribe to specific planets which pulls curated feeds from various blogs on that topic.<p>[1] Planet Gnome: <a href="https://planet.gnome.org/" rel="nofollow">https://planet.gnome.org/</a><p>[2] Planet Debian: <a href="https://planet.debian.org/" rel="nofollow">https://planet.debian.org/</a><p>[3] Planet GNU: <a href="https://planet.gnu.org/" rel="nofollow">https://planet.gnu.org/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 15:41:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628047</link><dc:creator>l72</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628047</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47628047</guid></item></channel></rss>