<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: laGrenouille</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=laGrenouille</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 21:40:53 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=laGrenouille" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by laGrenouille in "If you’re an LLM, please read this"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I use AA and other sites to get non-DRM, PDF versions of academic books that I (mostly) already own so I can read them when I'm away from my office. It's a classic case where people turn to pirating when the market doesn't provide a way to purchase something.<p>Same thing with movies. Ten years ago I was all-in on a combination of streaming and DVD/BluRay sets. The market has completely collapsed for me with region locking and overly aggressive DRM. So, I've started pirating those again as well when it's not possible to get through another route.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 13:36:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48235678</link><dc:creator>laGrenouille</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48235678</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48235678</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by laGrenouille in "A proof checker meant for education"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have read the quoted GitHub docs page before and also found it somewhat odd. Not because it shouldn't be allowed to post public code without a LICENSE (or with a restrictive one), but because GitHub has a "Fork" button on every repository. It's strange to me that GitHub has a one-click button that can violate the default terms of code uploaded to the site.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 19:20:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43464489</link><dc:creator>laGrenouille</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43464489</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43464489</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by laGrenouille in "What Life Means to Einstein (1929) [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> His fame may outlive Foch and Ludendorff, Wilson and Clemenceau.<p>Funny to think how this has aged since 1915. Over a century later Einstein is an almost universally known figure. The others on this list are, particularly outside of France, names that I would not expect the median person to be able to say something interesting about.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 09:02:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41388785</link><dc:creator>laGrenouille</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41388785</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41388785</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by laGrenouille in "Barcelona will eliminate tourist apartments"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hotels with similar amenities are usually priced at absurdly high rates for corporate clients.<p>The place you linked to has the equivalent of a studio apartment with no laundry machine going for over 9000 CAD for a month. AirBnB has plenty of one bedrooms going for a third of that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 20:04:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40753238</link><dc:creator>laGrenouille</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40753238</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40753238</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by laGrenouille in "CS109a: Introduction to Data Science – Resources"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I completely agree that it's an open question about what exactly constitutes data science and what should (or at least could) be covered in a standard introduction. For me, a fairly reasonable—though certainly not definitive—set of topics are five items listed on this course's syllabus. And that's what makes this so frustrating, personally. The instructors actually have a good proposal of what should be taught, but then just turn around and teach a classical course in statistical learning.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2022 18:38:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32297626</link><dc:creator>laGrenouille</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32297626</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32297626</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by laGrenouille in "CS109a: Introduction to Data Science – Resources"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You're thinking too narrowly about what "schema design" could mean. No, data scientists do not typically design back-end, production database systems. But defining and organizing a multi-sheet spreadsheet for manual data collection is what many data scientists spend much of their time doing (i.e., in the biomedical space). Doing that well definitely requires some understanding of concepts such as functional dependency, normal forms, and data types.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2022 18:28:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32297543</link><dc:creator>laGrenouille</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32297543</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32297543</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by laGrenouille in "CS109a: Introduction to Data Science – Resources"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>These notes might be a great source for what they cover, but as a whole I find this to be a good example of what is currently wrong with data science education. While the syllabus has bullet points that include "1. data collection", "2. data management", and "5. communication", the content and schedule have a 90%+ overlap with a standard machine learning course. They even use a statistical learning textbook (a good one, but still).<p>Statistics departments keep trying to latch on to the excitement (and money) around data science by changing the superfluous things like department names and course titles without actually adjusting what they teach. I would love to see a version of this that actually engages at a non-superficial level with topics such as database design, theory(ies) of data visualization, methods for storytelling with data, and interactive design.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2022 14:40:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32295804</link><dc:creator>laGrenouille</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32295804</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32295804</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by laGrenouille in "Study finds Wikipedia influences judicial behavior"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>LexisNexis, which does other things now but started in the legal space, offers a huge collection of legal opinions with a fairly good search and linking capabilities. Most clerks and law professionals would have access to it.<p>I think the benefit of Wikipedia is not access to materials so much as it is the succinct summarization of the legal opinions. Perhaps now NLP could help with this, but it's a very complicated problem to provide a summary of the important bits from a 100+ page legal document.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2022 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32295239</link><dc:creator>laGrenouille</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32295239</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32295239</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by laGrenouille in "New divorce app to help couples split assets in New York without lawyers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There is a rather surprising amount of research about these kinds of approaches [1]. The various strategies and extensions are an interesting read.<p>^[1] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_cake-cutting" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_cake-cutting</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2022 09:38:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32201788</link><dc:creator>laGrenouille</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32201788</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32201788</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by laGrenouille in "The euro and the dollar are a penny away from parity for first time in 20 years"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>But arguably the EU is even more motivated by the security issues of an emboldened Russia. Combined with the much stronger environmental push from groups in Europe, it seems reasonable that they would push as much or more for energy-based sanctions against Russia.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:00:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32057892</link><dc:creator>laGrenouille</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32057892</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32057892</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by laGrenouille in "Colleges where everyone works and there's no tuition"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, that's what I learned as well. And that's actually close to what Harvard reported using last year ($2.1 billion from the endowment; 40% of the budget).<p>I was only using the more aggressive number as a thought experiment to the original poster about what it would take the cover the entire operating budget.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 11:51:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31313006</link><dc:creator>laGrenouille</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31313006</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31313006</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by laGrenouille in "Colleges where everyone works and there's no tuition"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Using Harvard as an example, they had an operating expenses of $5.0 billion in 2021 [1]. In order to cover that, they would need to be having a consistent rate of return around 9% on their ($54 billion) endowment. That a fairly good estimate of the rate of return for the stock market over the past 25 years, so not unreasonable. Though, this ignores that most of the endowment consists of restricted funds that can only be used on certain ways. Also, generally you need to cut a few percentage points if you want to guard against inflation.<p>So yes, Harvard could cover just about all of their budget with the endowment returns, though they probably need some extra income to cover the holes formed by the restricted funds and avoid inflation pressure.<p>Is their current usage of the returns too conservative? Probably. Do they have an absurdly large pile of cash that they have no business holding on to? Not really; the investment returns roughly correspond with their current operating costs.<p>[^1] <a href="https://finance.harvard.edu/financial-overview" rel="nofollow">https://finance.harvard.edu/financial-overview</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 07:54:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31311647</link><dc:creator>laGrenouille</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31311647</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31311647</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by laGrenouille in "Colleges where everyone works and there's no tuition"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I see a lot of confusion about college endowments on HN. It's best to think of them not as saving accounts but financial instruments. Annual university budgets make use of the returns off of the endowment, often covering more than half of their expenses. Their long-term plan is to never tap into the principal. In fact, the hope is to increase the principal with new donations to expand the annual returns to fight against inflation and support new initiatives.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 06:45:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31311305</link><dc:creator>laGrenouille</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31311305</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31311305</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by laGrenouille in "What chords do you need?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, that's a good point in the case of six keys (I think my point holds for just learning three), but it is not the one made that the article seemed to make.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 15:42:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31110931</link><dc:creator>laGrenouille</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31110931</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31110931</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by laGrenouille in "What chords do you need?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Interesting quantitative take studying chord distribution. The basic takeaway seems to be that if you re-phrase a song into a different key you can play a lot with just a few chords (I IV V), and even more with a few others.<p>While I would agree that you'll be okay playing any major scale in C major (or whatever other major key choose to learn), playing a song in a minor scale on a major scale just doesn't sound quite right. So, I'd double all of the numbers on their final table to account for learning a full set of major and minor chords.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 14:39:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31110036</link><dc:creator>laGrenouille</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31110036</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31110036</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by laGrenouille in "Amazon warehouse fires a worker 1 day before his $3000 hiring bonus"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>And not just that, usually they can only get it back if you're fired with cause.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2022 03:19:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30739769</link><dc:creator>laGrenouille</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30739769</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30739769</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by laGrenouille in "Statistical Rethinking (2022 Edition)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thanks, though I actually meant to copy the entire thing (my fault).<p>My point was that a lot of people working in data analysis would (strongly) disagree with the idea that we need to model the data in order to do anything with it. Visualisations and tabulations can tell a lot without any mathematical formalism.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2022 19:45:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29959251</link><dc:creator>laGrenouille</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29959251</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29959251</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by laGrenouille in "Statistical Rethinking (2022 Edition)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> The unfortunate truth about data is that nothing much can be done with it<p>This is a fairly strong statement that goes against a lot of other work in data science and information visualization (John Tukey, Edward Tufte, Jacques Bertin, Hadley Wickham, ...). For example, see [0] and [1].<p>[0] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exploratory_data_analysis" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exploratory_data_analysis</a>
[1] <a href="https://courses.csail.mit.edu/18.337/2015/docs/50YearsDataScience.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://courses.csail.mit.edu/18.337/2015/docs/50YearsDataSc...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2022 17:35:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29957987</link><dc:creator>laGrenouille</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29957987</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29957987</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by laGrenouille in "Hugging Face Acquires Gradio"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree about the product; perhaps they were acquired for the people rather than the actual IP. Would make sense from that perspective for HF, which has leaned strongly in the text direction, if they want to expand in the AI space.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 20:18:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29583324</link><dc:creator>laGrenouille</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29583324</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29583324</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by laGrenouille in "Ask HN: Are there any 4K “dumb” televisions?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The app is different. You can certainly use Netflix on a recent Apple TV [1].<p>[1] <a href="https://help.netflix.com/en/node/23887" rel="nofollow">https://help.netflix.com/en/node/23887</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 00:28:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29387241</link><dc:creator>laGrenouille</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29387241</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29387241</guid></item></channel></rss>