https://github.com/meshtastic/firmware/blob/develop/src/mesh...

The true limits are imposed by the hardware, not the software, as it should be!

Being able to reprogram a pacemaker isn't enough!

We should require that any devices that our lives depends on, especially devices that go inside our bodies, to be open source: not just reprogrammable, but with source code available for inspection and modification.

I've been working in this industry for too long in order to trust a closed source pacemaker to be bug-free.

I wonder if the world would be a better place if we had fewer financial incentives to do things, in general?

> But why would a studio spend hundreds of millions making a blockbuster movie?

Under this hypothetical scenario, I believe there wouldn't be a "studio" in the first place. There could be a group of people who want to express themselves, get famous or do something just for fun, without any direct financial gain. Sure, they wouldn't be able to pull off Avatar 2, but our expectations as consumers would also be different.

So something like this: "Here's a PDF file containing Being and Time. Please explain the significance of anxiety (Angst) in the uncovering of Being."

So you could probably replace the whole backend while keeping things compatible as long as you maintain that simple API.

https://github.com/kelseyhightower/kubernetes-the-hard-way

It probably won't answer the "why" (although any LLM can answer that nowadays), but it will definitely answer the "how".

I'm not sure if this is sarcasm or not.

It does a very good job guiding me in areas where I'm less familiar.

That's assuming we're talking about technical problems. For non-technical problems I'd reach out to friends (or even better - a therapist). But asking on HN and/or Reddit might be a good idea too, depending on the context.

Sure, it'll lead to arms race like you describe on one side, but let's say 99% of the apps won't even engage in that arms race if the fake data is generic enough to cause a high number of false positives (blocking someone who's not actually faking the data).

Then, we can focus on the remaining 1% of worst offenders to actually enforce the policy.

I believe a rooted Android used to allow something like that, not sure if that still works nowadays.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31394991

Points: 3

# Comments: 0

It's also good to know that Yubikey's OTP tokens don't expire based on time, but based on a hidden counter that gets incremented with every issued token.

So if you've accidentally touched your Yubikey and leaked the token publicly, you just have to log out and then log back in using your Yubikey - that action will invalidate all tokens issued before this point.

Nothing. It's just a matter of technical means. They had no means of unlocking that phone without potentially compromising all the rest of the phones they've made before that point. But Apple account / emails are "in the cloud", so Apple has full access to it.

"Web of trust" is a pretty specific term that doesn't apply to TLS/SSL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_of_trust

Did you mean to say "public key infrastructure" (PKI)?

That's one way to look at it.

Another way is to say that Microsoft has lost customer's trust and now has to work extra hard to earn it back.

IMO they've learned their lesson, at least for now, but it would also be great if others could learn from Microsoft's mistake too.

Does this mean Deno introduced a breaking change in a minor version (1.5.0)?