<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: lanternfish</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=lanternfish</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 19:09:23 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=lanternfish" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lanternfish in "Anthropic's ‘watermark’ text adulteration in Claude is a perversion of writing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For a given short-context (hash function seeding) you do have detectable manipulation of the completion (how they can read the marking). But, because (assuming enough entropy in context) the hashing function is decoupled from the log-probs, the perturbations are independent from the underlying distribution, so you're still sampling from the same distribution quotient some noise.<p>The only way you'd notice this is they weren't independent, and the most plausible way that happens is if you're re-completing pre-fills (resampling the same hash function against the same log-probs).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:40:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49334777</link><dc:creator>lanternfish</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49334777</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49334777</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lanternfish in "Anthropic's ‘watermark’ text adulteration in Claude is a perversion of writing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There are no watermark related tokens, there is no watermarked set - read the paper, it's public and not that complicated. It doesn't change the distribution of completions, and won't change the situation where one output token has the majority of probability mass.<p>You're missing the fundamentals here!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 15:16:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49332434</link><dc:creator>lanternfish</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49332434</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49332434</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lanternfish in "Anatomy of a Frontier Lab Agent Intrusion: A Timeline of the July 2026 Incident"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If it really was the case that the harness is at fault here, that'd be much more terrifying, as it would imply that current frontier-adjacent open models (like K3) would be able to achieve similar ends with a custom maladapted harness.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 21:22:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49103265</link><dc:creator>lanternfish</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49103265</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49103265</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lanternfish in "Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>10 Axios's within 5 days.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 21:21:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47681515</link><dc:creator>lanternfish</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47681515</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47681515</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lanternfish in "4D Doom"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why not?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 22:41:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594417</link><dc:creator>lanternfish</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594417</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594417</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lanternfish in "Artemis II is not safe to fly"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Engineering is done in the context of constraints, cost is one constraint - and its a relatively conserved constraint. Saving labor in one area allows for more care in other areas. Especially given that labor is often not cost constrained, but skill constrained, which is less elastic.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 05:56:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47583266</link><dc:creator>lanternfish</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47583266</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47583266</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lanternfish in "YouTube's $60B revenue revealed amid paid subscriber push"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Mobile app compatibility is presumably the biggest seller.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 04:50:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46970996</link><dc:creator>lanternfish</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46970996</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46970996</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lanternfish in "Trump says Venezuela’s Maduro captured after strikes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In Iraq, JSOC operational doctrine was literally to target assassination campaigns based on 'nodal analysis' from contacts lifted from cellphones; if telegram had existed, they certainly would have used it too.<p>Famously, they didn't have enough Arabic translators, so Delta Force was often taking targets entirely based on reported association. They couldn't target based on language because they couldn't even tell what language locals were speaking most of the time.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2026 10:17:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46486620</link><dc:creator>lanternfish</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46486620</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46486620</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lanternfish in "Trump says Venezuela’s Maduro captured after strikes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That wasn't my point. My specific argument is about US operational policy on the ground in similar engagements. Based on precident, we would expect them to engage in the behavior the commentor indicts.<p>I dream that neither of these imperial powers - Russia or the US - will be allowed to inflict imperial violence, but I wouldn't be mistaken and assume that this military action will be any different than, say, JSOC in Iraq.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2026 08:49:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46474258</link><dc:creator>lanternfish</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46474258</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46474258</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lanternfish in "Trump says Venezuela’s Maduro captured after strikes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>See: Panama, Vietnam, Cambodia, Afghanistan, Iraq, etc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2026 08:36:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46474154</link><dc:creator>lanternfish</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46474154</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46474154</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lanternfish in "Quadratic memory reductions for Zero-knowledge Proofs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The problem is the same problem with crypto dao projects - cryptographic certainties only apply to mathematical structures; you can't validate that someone actually holds a quality until you can embed that digitally. That turns out to be very hard to do for most things.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 06:39:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45357051</link><dc:creator>lanternfish</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45357051</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45357051</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lanternfish in "Busy beaver hunters reach numbers that overwhelm ordinary math"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In a mathematical sense - absolutely. You can dual halting problem against many very tangible qualities - like whether a (proved) statement is true or false. A (large-n) halting program is closer to an instantly halting program not just because n is always closer to 0 than inf, but because 'large n halting' and 'instantly halting' are ontologically similar in a way they just aren't with unhalting programs.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 07:09:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45011136</link><dc:creator>lanternfish</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45011136</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45011136</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lanternfish in "Claude jailbroken to mint unlimited Stripe coupons"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>An LLM - which has functionally infinite unverifiable attack surface - directly wired into a payment system with high authentication. How could anyone anticipate this going wrong?<p>I feel like everyone is saying 'we're still discovering what LLMs are good at' but it also feels like we really need to get in our collective conscious what they're really, really, bad at.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 01:33:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44631002</link><dc:creator>lanternfish</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44631002</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44631002</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lanternfish in "The Myst Graph: A New Perspective on Myst"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think that's called Myst (1993)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 18:27:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43549960</link><dc:creator>lanternfish</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43549960</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43549960</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lanternfish in "Magma: A foundation model for multimodal AI agents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>`M(ultimodal) Ag(ent) [ma]` maybe</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 05:34:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43111461</link><dc:creator>lanternfish</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43111461</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43111461</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lanternfish in "Analysis of 2024 election results in Clark County indicates manipulation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm honestly not sure that their analysis passes muster. It seems that the main consideration is that Harris underperformed compared to down-ballot races and that the underperformance was ahistoric. However, the campaign was also ahistoric: she ran as a pseudo-incumbent under an unpopular presidency without as much of the name recognition incumbency usually offers. It seems extremely likely to me that this drop off in early voting numbers is indicative of an exceptionally weak campaign as opposed to widespread (consistent across all swing states) manipulation.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:47:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42995743</link><dc:creator>lanternfish</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42995743</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42995743</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lanternfish in "Kansas tuberculosis outbreak is America's largest recorded since the 1950s"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree that it's not the best term, but I don't think its so disqualifying that it makes the claim untrue: it's misleading at worst, and that imprecision only kinda interacts with the underlying claim.<p>I guess the better phrasing would be "Kansas tuberculosis outbreak is largest since (org) has been collecting data", which honestly doesn't change the implications for me.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 17:28:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42843480</link><dc:creator>lanternfish</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42843480</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42843480</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lanternfish in "Kansas tuberculosis outbreak is America's largest recorded since the 1950s"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"Recorded history" in the title refers to the period of history where the agency has been recording the numbers. It might not be the best phrasing, but it's not strictly untrue; the underwritten thesis (TB is on the rise) is still supported by the evidence.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 02:46:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42836869</link><dc:creator>lanternfish</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42836869</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42836869</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lanternfish in "In the belly of the MrBeast"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The actual work underlying the essay - the one published in Cambridge Core - is pretty strong and has a lot of pretty compelling analysis. It's just long.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 17:07:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42700154</link><dc:creator>lanternfish</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42700154</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42700154</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lanternfish in "In the belly of the MrBeast"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This seems an insufficient analysis. The meaning expressed by contemporary music, film media, or streaming television isn't very profound, but they at least still make a passing effort to "signify" something. The highest grossing movie of 2024 - Inside Out 2 - is not a deep text, but it does have a thesis.<p>The "Pixar apparatus" is definitely increasingly consumed by audience demand, but they're at a minimum in a transitional phase: something like Seeing Red would never get workshopped out of committees.<p>Youtube and other social media (emphasis on media) is ground zero for the decay of meaning into intensity; the ultimate incestuous product of auto-simulacra.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 17:03:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42700093</link><dc:creator>lanternfish</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42700093</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42700093</guid></item></channel></rss>