<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: lemax</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=lemax</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 03:29:21 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=lemax" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lemax in "Phone-free bars and restaurants on the rise across the U.S."]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The worst has been the post-covid assignment of seating and QR code driven ordering in bars. So few opportunities to mingle. I miss standing in bars, talking to bartenders, chatting with random patrons. This has recovered much better in large cities but I find that restaurants and bars in US suburban environments are deeply impersonal now. It’s no wonder singles are stuck meeting partners on apps with so little unstructured social opportunities left. Not to mention no one is going to bars anymore anyway.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 21:30:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47654066</link><dc:creator>lemax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47654066</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47654066</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Active Supply Chain Attack on axios 1.14.1]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>axios@1.14.1, published 2026-03-31, introduces a new dependency plain-crypto-js@4.2.1 that was not present in axios@1.14.0. This package is malicious — it contains an obfuscated postinstall script (setup.js) that downloads and executes a remote payload.<p>Evidence<p>axios@1.14.0 dependencies: follow-redirects, form-data, proxy-from-env (3 deps)<p>axios@1.14.1 dependencies: same 3 + plain-crypto-js (new, not in any prior axios version)<p>plain-crypto-js has "postinstall": "node setup.js" in its scripts<p>setup.js is heavily obfuscated — it decodes base64 strings, writes scripts to the OS temp directory, executes them via shell (macOS) or PowerShell (Windows), then deletes itself</p>
<hr>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47581837">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47581837</a></p>
<p>Points: 18</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 01:48:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47581837</link><dc:creator>lemax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47581837</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47581837</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lemax in "Get Shit Done: A meta-prompting, context engineering and spec-driven dev system"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm still stuck on superpowers. Can't seem to get better plans out of native claude planning - superpowers ensures I have a reviewed design that actually matches my mental model. Typical claude planning doesn't confirm assumptions sufficiently for my weak brain dumps/poorly spec'd tickets.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 09:44:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47423552</link><dc:creator>lemax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47423552</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47423552</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lemax in "Magical Mushroom – Europe's first industrial-scale mycelium packaging producer"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Mycelium has been shown to colonize some of the most unexpected substrates - cigarette butts [1], sawdust, you name it.<p><a href="https://circulareconomy.europa.eu/platform/en/good-practices/living-ashtray-purifungis-mushroom-eats-festivalgoers-cigarette-butts" rel="nofollow">https://circulareconomy.europa.eu/platform/en/good-practices...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 18:44:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47126796</link><dc:creator>lemax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47126796</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47126796</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lemax in "I'm not worried about AI job loss"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think that, for possibly a very long time, AI will just increase the quality bar and scale of expectations when we produce things. We might take the same amount of time (or longer) to produce something, but with significantly better outcomes. Ultimately human preferences and tastes prevail and the world is full of problems that are not simple I/O, that are not repeatable, and that require human taste to improve. The people who will immediately survive economically are the ones who leverage AI to produce stuff that wasn't possible before.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 00:07:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47009641</link><dc:creator>lemax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47009641</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47009641</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lemax in "Why "just prompt better" doesn't work"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've tried all the Q&A skills, confidence meters and little hacks to get agents to clarify and propose better solutions. Clarification and planning has gotten a lot better using some skills (e.g. obra/superpowers), but counterproposals and negative feedback are rarely up to snuff with something a staff level colleague would come up with - this seems to be amplified when you already have an extensive PRD or plan together. If a plan is already fleshed out but is inefficient or contains some anti-patterns, I've had better results just throwing these out, taking what I've learned and summarizing tradeoffs in a brand new chat.<p>Once you have a comprehensive plan together, or a fairly full context window, agents have a lot of issues zooming out. This is particularly painful in some coding agents since they're loading your existing code into context and get weighted down heavily by what already exists (which makes them good at other tasks) vs. what may be significantly simpler and better for net-new stuff or areas of your codebase that are more nascent.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 06:53:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46956207</link><dc:creator>lemax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46956207</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46956207</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lemax in "Wall Street just lost $285B because of 13 Markdown files"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, we're in for more headless interfaces and there are existing products that will struggle to serve these new interaction models due to organizational constraints. But I don't think it's as simple as asking "are they a system of record" as we think about the companies that will adapt and thrive and the new ones that will come. Enterprises are investing AI spend into improving core processes and responding to competitive pressure, not saving money and introducing risk into areas they have historically delegated to vendors. AI is going to give us <i>more</i> software, and increase spending as firms seek efficiency in new areas, and they're going to continue to knock on doors of vendors to do it as they always have. Not to mention the demand for auditable, repeatable workflows is still there and always going to be there and dedicated systems are needed to solve this in each problem domain.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 16:32:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46914950</link><dc:creator>lemax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46914950</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46914950</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lemax in "The tech monoculture is finally breaking"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah, I guess this take is tempting for a technologist, but Gen Z is buying iPods and walking around in wired headphones because it's cool and nostalgic, not because of usability. Cycles of nostalgia are well understood to be getting smaller.  The creative industry is creating new things less frequently and referring back sooner (the old 20 year cycle of fashion repeating itself is contracting). There <i>is</i> an element of disenchantment, of wanting to disconnect from the present, but that has always sort of been there as people reached for vintage cameras, record players, and old clothes in the niche cultural movements that have preceded the current Gen Z 2000's obsession that's happening.<p>see <a href="https://www.npr.org/2022/03/01/1081115609/from-tumblrcore-to-2014core-the-nostalgia-loop-is-getting-smaller-and-faster" rel="nofollow">https://www.npr.org/2022/03/01/1081115609/from-tumblrcore-to...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 23:02:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46739182</link><dc:creator>lemax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46739182</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46739182</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lemax in "Windsurf employee #2: I was given a payout of only 1% what my shares where worth"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is a fair cautionary tale but it's worth understanding the specifics of the situation – Windsurf maintained a relatively easy to replicate product with no moat, and employed a bunch of attractive talent. The company got gutted of these employees and lost its valuation because no suitable buyer thought their IP was  exceptionally valuable on its own. Just because this was the outcome for Windsurf  does not mean there are no longer opportunities to join startups building sticky  customer bases with valuable IP and walk away wealthier when they exit – yes there is a liquidity problem[1] but let'a be honest with ourselves about the specifics of the case for Windsurf.<p>[1] <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2024/01/11/us-startups-have-a-liquidity-problem/" rel="nofollow">https://techcrunch.com/2024/01/11/us-startups-have-a-liquidi...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 18:55:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44686872</link><dc:creator>lemax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44686872</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44686872</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lemax in "Acquisitions, consolidation, and innovation in AI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This take doesn't really highlight the fact that the most competitive foundational model companies <i>are</i> innovative application builders. Anthropic and OpenAI are vying for consumers to use their models by building these sort of super applications (ChatGPT, Claude) that can run code, plot graphs, spin up text editors, create geographic maps, etc. These are well staffed and strategically important areas of their businesses. There's competition to attract consumers to these apps and they will grow more capable and commoditize more compliments along the way. Who needs Jasper when you can edit copy in ChatGPT, or an AI python notebook app, or, now, Cursor?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 19:19:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43786430</link><dc:creator>lemax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43786430</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43786430</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Authorization in MCP Servers: What's Missing and What's Coming]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://maxhammad.substack.com/p/authorization-in-mcp-servers-whats">https://maxhammad.substack.com/p/authorization-in-mcp-servers-whats</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43671934">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43671934</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2025 11:15:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://maxhammad.substack.com/p/authorization-in-mcp-servers-whats</link><dc:creator>lemax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43671934</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43671934</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lemax in "Charlie Javice convicted of defrauding JPMorgan in $175M startup sale"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm not sure that's the "core problem", it sounds like companies should do diligence on a data asset if that's what they're after.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 02:55:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43542351</link><dc:creator>lemax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43542351</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43542351</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lemax in "Show HN: I built a website for sharing drum patterns"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>ISPs / other middlemen can monitor and modify unencrypted traffic. In Egypt, Syria and Turkey for example ISP’s injected malware into unencrypted sites that led people to install spyware when attempting to download legitimate programs (link). Other state actors have changed the content of news media, etc. Without HTTPS you lose the ability to trust the integrity of a given webpage.<p><a href="https://www.bitdefender.com/en-us/blog/hotforsecurity/turkish-egyptian-isps-help-local-government-conduct-massive-spyware-operation" rel="nofollow">https://www.bitdefender.com/en-us/blog/hotforsecurity/turkis...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:33:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43456954</link><dc:creator>lemax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43456954</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43456954</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lemax in "Seven39 – a social media app that is only open for 3 hours every evening"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It could be interesting to host several isolated versions open at different times, maybe a Nine39, a Five39? But you can only sign up for one.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 06:40:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43329780</link><dc:creator>lemax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43329780</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43329780</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lemax in "Who killed the rave?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There is still a vast web of international niche electronic music scenes and artists, and elements of electronic music as well as the instruments used to produce it have been used in popular music for many decades (Donna Summer, 80s new wave bands, Madonna, etc).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 19:31:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42637597</link><dc:creator>lemax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42637597</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42637597</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Has Sequoia Capital outgrown its business model?]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.economist.com/business/2024/11/28/has-sequoia-capital-outgrown-its-business-model">https://www.economist.com/business/2024/11/28/has-sequoia-capital-outgrown-its-business-model</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42277513">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42277513</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 22:02:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.economist.com/business/2024/11/28/has-sequoia-capital-outgrown-its-business-model</link><dc:creator>lemax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42277513</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42277513</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lemax in "How good are American roads?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I once drove across the US-Canadian border during a snowstorm. On the Canadian side, the road was a slew of white slush that had us hydroplaning on and off. But as soon as we crossed back into the States, it was like a switch flipped. The road went from a slushy bog to a pristine surface with zero snow accumulation, just a slight gleam of moisture.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 19:44:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42197400</link><dc:creator>lemax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42197400</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42197400</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lemax in "A new JSON data type for ClickHouse"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As far as I understand they're talking about the internal storage mechanics of ClickHouse, these aren't user exposed JSON data types, they just power the underlying optimizations they're introducing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 02:29:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41921163</link><dc:creator>lemax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41921163</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41921163</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lemax in "Threat actor abuses Cloudflare tunnels to deliver remote access trojans"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Isn't this what happens to every free quick tunnel product? Was kinda just waiting for this to play out. ngrok had nice zero friction tunneling when it came out but then they had to put everything behind a sign-up flow due to the same sort of abuse.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 22:34:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41134331</link><dc:creator>lemax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41134331</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41134331</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lemax in "Copying is the way design works (2020)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As a designer, one eventually thinks not about what they liked in other people's work but why it worked. You can derive a design out a compendium of some things that you've seen that you like, but ultimately, to be successful you need to know why what you're copying made sense for its purpose. Perhaps you need to even encounter the same problem; it takes a bit of maturity to copy effectively.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 06:31:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41043129</link><dc:creator>lemax</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41043129</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41043129</guid></item></channel></rss>