<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: leoc</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=leoc</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 01:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=leoc" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leoc in "On caring for user data: NeoVim caused Vim undo files to be deleted"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Right. It <i>is</i> weird that this has to be explained, but let's make it clear: in the Before Times, probably anytime up to at <i>least</i> the late '00s, probably approximately <i>no-one</i> in or around free or open source software would have endorsed the idea that the legal disclaimers completely free even the most mainstream, self-publicising, broad-userbase open source projects from any moral or ethical obligation to have even the slightest concern to ensure that their software doesn't hurt or betray its non-paying users, even in the most harmful ways. And if one of the many and often vocal FOSS <i>opponents</i> of the time had started claiming that this is what open-source developers really believe they'd have rightly been seen as having veered off into the lunatic fringe. And that's because it's a, frankly, bonkers idea which is radically detached from normal human understanding of the social and moral role and obligations of volunteers, voluntary organisations, charitable givers or gift-givers. And also because it's a wildly counterproductive idea to put out there if you're hoping to increase FOSS adoption.<p>That does leave the question of why this idea has started to take off more recently. Part of the answer is certainly that Rich Hickey, disgracefully, set the ball rolling in this direction, and that many others have welcomed it as one weird trick and one pat answer for all the worsening problems of developer burnout. Unfortunately it seems hard to dismiss the idea that it's also social breakdown driven by a broader trend, as over time we move further and further from the pre-'60s "neurotic society" of people obsessed with duty and social conformity (often with oppressive or destructive results, to be sure) into the "psychopathic society" in which even people who don't themselves merit a Cluster B diagnosis have internalised narcissistic and psychopathic attitudes.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 19:56:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49870228</link><dc:creator>leoc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49870228</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49870228</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leoc in "The Normalization of Inexplicable Failures"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think some of it is an unintended consequence of the backlash against bad or puzzling error dialog boxes in '80s and '90s software. A lot of people seem to have concluded that the easy solution to the challenges of error reporting was just to fail silently instead roll_safe.jpg .</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 17:21:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49868720</link><dc:creator>leoc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49868720</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49868720</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leoc in "Installing NeoVim caused original Vim undo files to be deleted"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Suppose that you build a childrens' slide in your front garden. You put up a big sign saying "Consider using my slide! <a href="https://neovim.io/" rel="nofollow">https://neovim.io/</a> Here are several wonderful things about it. It's free for everyone!" in your yard. Underneath in smaller letters you add "[No liability]". You also put up noticeboard ads for your free kids' slide in neighbourhood shopping malls <a href="https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/neovim" rel="nofollow">https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/neovim</a> <a href="https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Neovim" rel="nofollow">https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Neovim</a> . Unfortunately, when you built the slide, you left sharp metal edges and corners sticking far up on the inside, reaching into the path of the user. No reasonably competent and diligent metalworker or slide-maker would have failed to notice these major flaws or failed to understand the serious danger they represented. Several neighbourhood children use the slide and receive serious gashes to the legs, arms or face, and have to go to the hospital. Even assuming that your no-liability small print somehow had you free and clear <i>legally</i>, do you believe that your behaviour would have been ethically and morally above all criticism? Do you think that "should have read the small print!" or "can't I build what I like in my own front yard?!" would have you covered? Do you think that your family and friends would agree?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 16:42:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49868323</link><dc:creator>leoc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49868323</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49868323</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leoc in ""They had no concept of a duty of care to their users.""]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's not how liability works, not either morally or (IANAL) legally.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 15:49:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49867760</link><dc:creator>leoc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49867760</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49867760</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leoc in "ASML says it sold 'absolutely nothing' in Europe in 2026"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Intel has committed to bringing "Intel 3" to Leixlip <a href="https://www.idaireland.com/latest-news/press-release/intel-announces-5-billion-investment-to-expand-european-manufacturing-output" rel="nofollow">https://www.idaireland.com/latest-news/press-release/intel-a...</a> , so below 12nm or 7nm but still above 20A/2nm IIUC. It does also seem that Intel has already ordered ASML EUV machines for Leixlip, which arrived by 2023 <a href="https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/corporate/eu-chipmaking/expanding-chip-manufacturing-in-europe.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/corporate/eu-chipmak...</a> .</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 13:37:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49856435</link><dc:creator>leoc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49856435</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49856435</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leoc in "Tech Needs Humanists More"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Mark Zuckerberg famously studied Latin in high school and remains a Classics enthusiast.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 10:48:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49842710</link><dc:creator>leoc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49842710</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49842710</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leoc in "Where's the Beef?: The lab-grown-meat revolution that wasn't"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Right, but photoengraving is hardware at its easiest—which is not to say that it's <i>easy</i> at the level the industry has now taken it to.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 17:08:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49833666</link><dc:creator>leoc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49833666</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49833666</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leoc in "Tokens too cheap to meter"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I wouldn’t say so. Once local solutions pass a threshold of affordability consumers tend not to mind too much about their inefficient resource utilisation: see the many thousands of MacBooks which sit largely idle for most of the day. And efficient utilisation is actively against the interests of hardware manufacturers, at least while they’re not supply-constrained and looking to sell their limited supply to whomever can pay top dollar.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 18:32:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49820446</link><dc:creator>leoc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49820446</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49820446</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leoc in "Tokens too cheap to meter"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's true that LLMs "want" to be be local, but they won't shift broadly to being local until there's a sufficiently large supply of VRAM or (at least) "unified" memory from the manufacturers. (I'm also assuming here that radical regulatory changes like government bans of local models aren't going to happen.) So (AFAICS—I am no expert) the future of LLMs over the next few years comes down primarily to the nitty-gritty of how much memory fab capacity will be added and when, and to a lesser extent of what happens to future demand from LLM SaaS services (& maybe their existing stock of hardware if they get in trouble). (I'm also assuming no roughly-AGI-sized leap forward which makes the frontier models of the near future vastly more valuable than the near-fontier models of today.) For the incumbent manufacturers the high-margin business is selling to LLM SaaS providers who use VRAM efficiently, but the high-volume business is getting chips into millions of laptops which will use VRAM very inefficiently. I assume that they will want to move from high margins to high volumes as they build they physical capacity to ship higher volumes, but they seem to prefer to do it at a stately pace. Hopefully some jostling from Chinese competitors, and maybe a dropoff in demand from data centres, will speed things along.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 15:32:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49817670</link><dc:creator>leoc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49817670</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49817670</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leoc in "I am often wrong"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Go To Market/Project Management?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 12:14:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49786283</link><dc:creator>leoc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49786283</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49786283</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leoc in "Samsung is expected to more than double output of its HBM4 and HBM4E DRAM"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>But high demand for LLM time isn't sufficient to keep customers at the frontier LLM SaaS providers. That demand can be satisfied locally or at non-frontier outlets, absent hardware shortages at least. The Tier 1 providers (and the would-be Tier 1s) presumably need to open up a much bigger lead in model quality, one that doesn't simply get distilled away this time, and/or continue to be protected by ongoing (or worsening!) hardware shortages. (And that's overlooking the revenue shortfalls which OpenAI and Anthropic seem to be facing already.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 23:59:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49781448</link><dc:creator>leoc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49781448</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49781448</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leoc in "Samsung is expected to more than double output of its HBM4 and HBM4E DRAM"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Seemingly the AI bulls are either not sufficiently optimistic, or not sufficiently wealthy(?!), to build new fabs as joint ventures with the manufacturers in which they agree to assume most of the downside risk?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 23:50:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49781384</link><dc:creator>leoc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49781384</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49781384</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leoc in "Samsung is expected to more than double output of its HBM4 and HBM4E DRAM"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That greater efficiency only benefits the LLM SaaS providers as long as the hardware manufacturers, probably especially the VRAM manufacturers, remain supply constrained, since the high-efficiency users are the ones who can pay top dollar. But the hardware guys' dream is presumably to get parts into millions of laptops which remain on standby for 19 hours a day, not to bargain with SaaS providers who obsessively optimise their memory consumption.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 23:41:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49781314</link><dc:creator>leoc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49781314</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49781314</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leoc in "Key symbols we lost to time, pt. 2: The Mac side"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> The Star left cluster are primarily operations that pair the left hand on the keys with the right hand on the mouse.<p>Sure (this is demonstrated in the linked video, for instance) but the ZXCV group is pretty similar in that respect. Even for operations which involve the mouse it's preferable to drag only one hand far away from its home position, rather than both of them. (Especially since the video evidence <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cn4vC80Pv6Q" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cn4vC80Pv6Q</a> seems to suggest that Star users tended to move their left hand only after making the mouse selection, instead of prepositioning it.) And the Star's Undo key, which presumably doesn't require help from mouse input and is likely to be needed after a non-mouse action, isn't placed any more conveniently near the home row: it's simply in the right side-cluster rather than the left one.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 18:24:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49778481</link><dc:creator>leoc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49778481</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49778481</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leoc in "Key symbols we lost to time, pt. 2: The Mac side"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't see a clear advantage over the the ZXCV shortcut placement which the Macintosh team chose. (The original Finder had no specific Redo shortcut because it was single-undo and ⌘-Z performed both undo and redo.) Even well-placed dedicated keys on a Xerox-style (or later Sun-style) "fun cluster" <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBiWtJJN5zk" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBiWtJJN5zk</a> to the left of the alphabetic cluster would have forced the hand to move further away from the home row. Of course ZXCV is much less well-adapted to the left-handed, but that would probably be true of any dedicated keys as well, unless they were mirrored on both sides of the keyboard.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 16:44:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49777489</link><dc:creator>leoc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49777489</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49777489</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leoc in "AI and the Destruction of the Creative Commons"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It also seems pretty reasonable to worry that Oracle isn't banning LLM code contributions to OpenJDK <a href="https://www.theregister.com/ai-and-ml/2026/08/03/as-larry-ellison-bets-the-farm-oracle-says-it-loves-ai-written-code-just-not-in-openjdk/5281851" rel="nofollow">https://www.theregister.com/ai-and-ml/2026/08/03/as-larry-el...</a> ( HN discussion at <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49213754">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49213754</a> ) purely on quality grounds. If things carry on as at present, and it turns out that indeed it really <i>was</i> legally safe to copy and paste almost any code that came out of an LLM, then that's one thing; but if instead there's a rash of code copyright (and indeed patent) lawsuits a few years from now then the big and middling companies will simply pay each other settlements, while FOSS projects and their small-fry users will likely be in a much worse situation.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 13:20:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49775591</link><dc:creator>leoc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49775591</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49775591</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leoc in "The Secret Life of Circuits"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thanks. And the publisher's companion page with supplementary materials is <a href="https://shop.elsevier.com/books/book-companion/9781558607354" rel="nofollow">https://shop.elsevier.com/books/book-companion/9781558607354</a> .</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 18:07:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49768802</link><dc:creator>leoc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49768802</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49768802</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leoc in "The Secret Life of Circuits"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Also, "Readings" is hidden behind a "Menu" menu button on the mobile-device version of that page.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 17:42:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49768607</link><dc:creator>leoc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49768607</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49768607</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leoc in "Pre-Greek: The lost language hidden within Ancient Greek"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>IIRC there's a common cultural tendency to put a lot of stock in the magical powers of exotic foreign wizards, so divination might not be such a bad explanation at all.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 13:52:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49754435</link><dc:creator>leoc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49754435</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49754435</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leoc in "Diplodocus, Long Thought Exclusively American, Turns Up in Spain"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The EU is asserting its strategic independence and will no longer rely on the US for supplies of whip-tailed herbivorous dinosaur fossils.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 09:47:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49752071</link><dc:creator>leoc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49752071</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49752071</guid></item></channel></rss>