Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47723555

Points: 1

# Comments: 1

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42915350

Points: 4

# Comments: 0

But to substantively respond: NO. This is exceptionally naive. Democracy assumes shared fates and aligned incentives among (both voting and communicating) participants. A foreign adversary mainlining their interests into half the population of the US absolutely violates this assumption.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42410722

Points: 8

# Comments: 0

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41434753

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41384952

Points: 2

# Comments: 1

There are lots of things people are able to learn today that they "couldn't" a few years ago (programming, math, reading). How are the researchers able to tell that the limitation lies with the dog and not with the trainer/household?

Using the hydrostatic pressure formula:

Pressure = Density of water × Acceleration due to gravity × Depth

Assuming the same density of water (1,000 kg/m³) and acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s²):

Pressure = 1,000 kg/m³ × 9.8 m/s² × 4,000 m Pressure = 39,200,000 Pascal (Pa)

Converting to atmospheres:

Pressure in atmospheres = 39,200,000 Pa / 101,325 Pa/atm Pressure in atmospheres ≈ 387 atm

Considering a safety factor of 2, as before, we can calculate the required thickness:

Required thickness = Pressure / (Tensile strength × Safety factor) Required thickness = 387 atm × 101,325 Pa/atm / (434 MPa × 2)

Converting units:

Required thickness ≈ 39,200,000 Pa / (434 × 10^6 Pa × 2) Required thickness ≈ 0.045 meters or 1.48 inches

Therefore, at a depth of 4,000 meters, the titanium walls of the submersible sphere with a 10 ft diameter would need to be approximately 1.48 inches thick to resist implosion, assuming a safety factor of 2. Again, please note that this estimation may vary based on the design, shape, and structural considerations of the submersible sphere. Consulting with experts is essential for accurate calculations and safety assessments.

As for amount of titanium required:

First, let's convert the wall thickness to meters. Since 1 inch is approximately 0.0254 meters, the wall thickness of 1.5 inches would be approximately 0.0381 meters.

Now, let's calculate the internal volume of the sphere by subtracting the volume of the inner sphere (10 ft diameter minus 2 times the wall thickness) from the volume of the outer sphere (10 ft diameter):

Inner radius = Radius of the sphere - Wall thickness Inner radius = 1.524 meters - 0.0381 meters Inner radius = 1.4869 meters

Inner volume = (4/3) * π * (Inner radius)^3 Inner volume ≈ 14.012 cubic meters

Outer volume = (4/3) * π * (1.524 meters)^3 Outer volume ≈ 14.137 cubic meters

Now, we can calculate the volume of the titanium walls by subtracting the inner volume from the outer volume:

Titanium wall volume = Outer volume - Inner volume Titanium wall volume ≈ 14.137 cubic meters - 14.012 cubic meters Titanium wall volume ≈ 0.125 cubic meters

Finally, we can calculate the mass of titanium using the density of titanium (4,506 kg/m³):

Mass of titanium = Titanium wall volume * Density of titanium Mass of titanium ≈ 0.125 cubic meters * 4,506 kg/m³ Mass of titanium ≈ 563.25 kg

Therefore, with a wall thickness of 1.5 inches, the approximate amount of titanium required for the walls of the submersible sphere with a 10 ft diameter would be approximately 563.25 kilograms.

Titanium is currently around $6/kg, so ~$3.4k for just the titanium that made up the wall.

Yes, let's create great safety nets. As a city with a $9 billion budget (for just 800,000 people; that's $11k for every person living here) they can afford better safety nets than anywhere.

So if it's not the inequality, and it's not lack of funding, what's the cause of all the crime and homelessness?

Here are a few examples of how dysfunctional SF politics is: [1] Chris Sacca tried to give SF free wifi 15 years ago, and they wouldn't accept it. https://www.reddit.com/r/sanfrancisco/comments/mf1x52/chris_...

[2] During covid, the SF school board decided one of their highest priorities would be to spend 10s of millions to rename their schools https://www.npr.org/2021/04/07/984919925/san-francisco-schoo...

[3] Because they claimed the law disproportionately impacted people of color, SF made all shoplifting of goods valued less than $950 a misdemeanor. https://www.hoover.org/research/why-shoplifting-now-de-facto...

So maybe — just maybe — it's not the insane inequality. It's utterly horrible governance.

As said above: would you prefer to see hundreds or thousands of small companies fail, their employees go on unemployment insurance, etc.?

The tech has already been proven—carriers just need to be mandated to add it because there's no business reason to do so.

And even if we're not in a "dark forest", keeping quiet is generally good social hygiene and tends to correlate with maturity. Which may be a side-effect of #2.

Smaker asked ~150 inmates to participate, and only a tiny handful agreed.