China is a bit closer to DPRK though and shares a land border so its a but easier for them to assist.

The Turing Test was to figure out which it the participants was a _Woman_ not human!

https://courses.cs.umbc.edu/471/papers/turing.pdf

I’m sure the members of say the Palm Island Home Owners Association don’t want their tax dollars going outside of Palm Island.

I take it you haven’t been to Florida much during election season, Stop Socialism is a common billboard.

The concern is predatory pricing [1]. Which may or may not result in job loss (the surviving company could hire/acquire the dieing companies).

[1]: https://www.ftc.gov/advice-guidance/competition-guidance/gui...

I’m not entirely sure Google should have both Go and Carbon but when you have billions in server costs it makes sense to do extreme stuff for even basis points of performance. I’m still surprised at how much java there is.

Exxon is up 40% year-to-date (YTD), BP is up 20% YTD while SNP500 is up 12% YTD.

So I'm not even sure the premise of this tangent is correct; oil stocks aren't shown to be the recipient of the current price spike.

I mean, it's very low effort to have somebody else do all the work. But you'll never see a self-employed electrician creating an account in the Cayman Islands to avoid taxes.

The goal of a hedge fund is definitionally to hedge some risk. If you work in say AI then they should invest very little of your funds into AI (to hedge against a blow-up in AI eliminating your income and if you invested in ai also your savings). In the current environment they’d almost certainly have below market returns. It doesn’t make the hedge fund bad; the hedge is meant to counteract losses not double down on gains.

Thats said, a lot of hedge funds now operate as pod shops and that goal is to beat the market.

But also the waves overlap so we’d still have about 700k cars in additional supply.

Words change around you. Much like how Republican doesn’t mean fiscal responsibility or small government for many decades.

You may not feel that way and thats fine. Just like people think the world is flat. Nothing you do is going to be affected by that ignorance.

Nobody is going to want to use a platform with spam.

The dutch became a bicycle paradise with the same strategy. They just started a couple generations ago.

The problem is only when you set a goal of say 2035 but don’t plan to do anything until 2033. Then it’s clear the plan is to give up in 2031.

Pretty much every time somebody backs up these kinds of claims it shows something else.

1) posts going out 500 times a day in all caps (who is arguing you can’t suppress spam?)

2) the post that you read and so clearly wasn’t suppressed.

3) they’re linking to a low scoring comment

If you go find the original ones it’s all about defending Facebook. Basically you can’t give our data to a competitor or build one. There’s a reason they had to quickly release a new ToS and its cause CA didn’t break it.

Especially since it uses your cookies by default.