<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: leto_ii</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=leto_ii</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 00:49:21 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=leto_ii" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leto_ii in "The Legend of von Neumann (1973) [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why make it about his ethnicity?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 14:01:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49933650</link><dc:creator>leto_ii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49933650</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49933650</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leto_ii in "What will our economic future look like?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Lower staffing levels per unit of care performed makes medical care cheaper for patients.<p>Based on how neoliberal capitalism tends to work it will simply lead to more profits for hospitals etc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 14:53:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49627620</link><dc:creator>leto_ii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49627620</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49627620</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leto_ii in "What will our economic future look like?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Wdym? self-checkout definitely lead to fewer supermarket workers being employed.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 14:51:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49627591</link><dc:creator>leto_ii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49627591</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49627591</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leto_ii in "How to earn a billion dollars"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Since we started it in 2005 we've funded about 6500 companies.<p>> Starting a successful startup is the most common way to become a billionaire, so in effect I've spent the last 21 years training people to become billionaires. So far about 30 of them have, but there are many more in the pipeline.<p>Seems to me that right off the bat he completely undermines his own point - less than .5% of the founders being funded at basically the best connected best financed incubator become billionaires. Easy, right?<p>I won't even go into the embarrassing math that follows... pyramid scheme salesman levels...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 12:48:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48526734</link><dc:creator>leto_ii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48526734</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48526734</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[A Theory of Cognitive Inequality]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://davidbessis.substack.com/p/attention-is-all-we-have">https://davidbessis.substack.com/p/attention-is-all-we-have</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46883886">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46883886</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 10:08:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://davidbessis.substack.com/p/attention-is-all-we-have</link><dc:creator>leto_ii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46883886</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46883886</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leto_ii in "Google was down in eastern EU and Turkey"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For me at least ChatGPT was down as well. Does anybody have an idea what they're using from Google?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 13:35:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45127122</link><dc:creator>leto_ii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45127122</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45127122</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leto_ii in "Raised by Wolves Is Original Sci-Fi at Its Most Polarizing (2020)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> the ending went completely downhill for me<p>The series was cancelled after 2 seasons, so many plot lines were left unresolved.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 07:53:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44861727</link><dc:creator>leto_ii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44861727</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44861727</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leto_ii in "The Leaderboard Illusion"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Is this sarcasm? Otherwise I'm not sure how that follows. Seems more reasonable to believe that they're hitting walls and switching to PR and productizing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:47:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43843868</link><dc:creator>leto_ii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43843868</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43843868</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leto_ii in "The Industrialization of IT"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I find the outlined scenario well argued and plausible.<p>What's more interesting to me though is the complete lack of mention of labor unions as a potential defense mechanism for engineers (either in the OP or in the conversation here, at least so far).<p>For a while now I've felt it's quite arrogant and completely naive of us to not accept that we're just keyboard workers, and not rare special flowers that will forever be economically privileged.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 08:27:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43690318</link><dc:creator>leto_ii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43690318</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43690318</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Star Gauge (Poem)]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Gauge">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Gauge</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43059846">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43059846</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2025 16:39:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Gauge</link><dc:creator>leto_ii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43059846</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43059846</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leto_ii in "BYD quarterly sales beat Tesla for first time"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://archive.ph/VtIMd" rel="nofollow">https://archive.ph/VtIMd</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2024 18:54:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41998843</link><dc:creator>leto_ii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41998843</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41998843</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[BYD quarterly sales beat Tesla for first time]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/fcc2db63-fb5a-4ae3-ab05-b8136b5193f4">https://www.ft.com/content/fcc2db63-fb5a-4ae3-ab05-b8136b5193f4</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41998840">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41998840</a></p>
<p>Points: 98</p>
<p># Comments: 122</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2024 18:54:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.ft.com/content/fcc2db63-fb5a-4ae3-ab05-b8136b5193f4</link><dc:creator>leto_ii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41998840</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41998840</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leto_ii in "Linear Algebra Done Right [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> sometimes you need the excellent dry theory and sometimes you need the more concrete but messy application, and in truth you will always vacillate between the two - this is the former<p>Fully agree. Axler says it quite clearly that the book is intended for a second course in linear algebra. While not an applied text, I find it close enough that it allows you to subsequently go back to your applied material and see it with new eyes.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2024 15:19:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41417668</link><dc:creator>leto_ii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41417668</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41417668</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leto_ii in "Linear Algebra Done Right [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm actually right now working through this book (3rd edition). It's pretty much the most abstract and most clear and simple maths books I've worked through so far (I'm not a mathematician).<p>Personally I find it suits my needs perfectly, even though initially it can be intimidating. But once you start getting the hang of it I think it can allow you to build a much deeper intuition for things than a more applied text.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2024 14:07:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41417084</link><dc:creator>leto_ii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41417084</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41417084</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leto_ii in "Snowden: The arrest of Durov is an assault on the basic human rights"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Assuming that that's true (which wouldn't make any sense to me, but let's say), why would Snowden defend Durov?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2024 20:13:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41361444</link><dc:creator>leto_ii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41361444</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41361444</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leto_ii in "Snowden: The arrest of Durov is an assault on the basic human rights"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Would Snowden have said the same thing if Durov didn't escape from Russia before he was arrested?<p>Why not? What's the thinking here?<p>> Probably not, Snowden is part of the Russian Spy and Disinformation campaign. He is basically a Russian agent.<p>Any evidence for that?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2024 19:50:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41361106</link><dc:creator>leto_ii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41361106</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41361106</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leto_ii in "The U.S. wanted to knock down Huawei. It's only getting stronger"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://archive.ph/JgNQg" rel="nofollow">https://archive.ph/JgNQg</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2024 18:06:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41148166</link><dc:creator>leto_ii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41148166</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41148166</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[The U.S. wanted to knock down Huawei. It's only getting stronger]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.wsj.com/business/telecom/huawei-china-technology-us-sanctions-76462031">https://www.wsj.com/business/telecom/huawei-china-technology-us-sanctions-76462031</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41148164">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41148164</a></p>
<p>Points: 77</p>
<p># Comments: 73</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2024 18:06:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.wsj.com/business/telecom/huawei-china-technology-us-sanctions-76462031</link><dc:creator>leto_ii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41148164</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41148164</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leto_ii in "Well-known paradox of R-squared is still buggin me"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is not a matter of class balance that much. If you want to predict which of two parties somebody will vote with, the most natural framing is that of binary classification.<p>For that you need to threshold your predictions. Ideally you'd like your model to generate a bimodal distribution so that you can threshold without many false positives etc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 13:55:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40874987</link><dc:creator>leto_ii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40874987</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40874987</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by leto_ii in "Well-known paradox of R-squared is still buggin me"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As other commenters have pointed out in one way or another, the problem seems to actually be that this simplistic model of voter choice can't capture all the structure of the real world that humans can quickly infer from the setup. Things like: state elections have millions of voters, 55/45 is actually a decisive, not a narrow win etc.<p>In a generic setup, imagine you have a binary classifier that outputs probabilities in the .45-.55 range - likely it won't be a really strong classifier. You would ideally like polarized predictions, not values around .5.<p>Come to think of it, could this be an issue of non-ergodicity too ( hope I'm using the term right)? i.e. state level prior is not that informative wrt individual vote?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:17:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40872477</link><dc:creator>leto_ii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40872477</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40872477</guid></item></channel></rss>