<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: lf88</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=lf88</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 12:04:37 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=lf88" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lf88 in "An Alien Mind"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think that we are speed-running towards a future that very few people really want, and I find it terrifying that few companies feel entitled to choose this future for the rest of us. 
Some of the arguments in this document would call for an immediate, global, pause on frontier AI training: we need time to consider how and to what extent AI should be part of our future. 
Personally, I can't picture a scenario where humanity thrives alongside an alien super-intelligence, especially if it cannot be fully controlled. Let aside super-intelligence, I am not even sure that deploying an AGI that replaces (instead of augmenting/assisting) humans in most intellectual tasks would be in the best interest of our species. This conversation has to happen, on a global level and as soon as possible.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:07:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49592279</link><dc:creator>lf88</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49592279</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49592279</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lf88 in "AlphaEvolve: A Gemini-powered coding agent for designing advanced algorithms"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>By googling "4x4 matrices multiplication 48" I ended up on this discussion on math.stackexchange <a href="https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/578342/number-of-elementary-multiplications-for-multiplying-4x4-matrices" rel="nofollow">https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/578342/number-of-el...</a> , where in 2019 someone stated "It is possible to multiply two 4×4 matrix A,B with only 48 multiplications.", with a link to a PhD thesis. This might mean that the result was already known (I still have to check the outline of the algorithm).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 19:38:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43988380</link><dc:creator>lf88</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43988380</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43988380</guid></item></channel></rss>