This is actually pretty funny.

But even codex has these super weird time limits. It's really starting to show that these companies must have been losing a ton of money with all the recent limits and degration.

I'm still on the "camp" that most of these unicorns will be F'ed by open and local models in the next few years, at least in these coding/chatbox niches and then they'll just be perpetually (re)searching for AGI :shrug:

Before: “Advertising funded search engines will be inherently biased toward the advertisers and away from the needs of the consumers.”

After: ~75–80%+ of revenue comes from ads

Facebook

Before: “Facebook is not about making money… it’s about building something cool.”, “We don’t build services to make money; we make money to build better services.”

After: ~97%+ of revenue comes from advertising

Twitter

Before: “We want to figure out a way to monetize that doesn’t interfere with the user experience.”

After: ~68% of X’s total revenue comes from advertising (~85–90%+ of revenue pre-Musk)

OpenAI

Before: "Something something AGI"

After: "But first, Ads!"

Still an awesome service and platform.. but no longer worth it price wise as it once was. Same with Vultr..

I guess at some point all investors just pressure these companies into price matching AWS and other pay-for-every-single-thing-ever companies.

Congrats on this, not only you got credits on a feature movie, you got one of the good ones. Cloud 9 for you, enjoy!

The path of least resistance is not a good way to do business or provide good service to your customers.

[0] https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/189268

[1] https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47396841

Points: 14

# Comments: 8

I'm not sure where this conclusion is coming from. We're very likely already in an AI bubble so I'm thinking that open/free models will eventually dilute the huge ridiculous valuations these companies have. Also the natural increase in consumer hardware power will eventually allow many people to just use local models instead both for privacy and cost reasons.

And seeing as most models are essentially only improved versions of the previous ones with larger context and more training data, unless some new "Attention Is All You Need" paper comes out that will give us a big step into AGI territory, I'm really not seeing a new company reach $10T valuation by just releasing marginally better models every couple of months imho.

It's pretty awesome but still does a lot of basic idiotic stuff. I was implementing a feature that required a global keyboard shortcut and asked opus to define it, taking into account not to clash with common shortcuts. He built a field where only one modifier key was required. After mentioning that this was not safe since users could just define CTRL+C for the shortcut and we need more safeguards and require at least two modifier keys I got the usual "you're absolutely right" and proceeded to require two modifier keys. But then it also created a huge list of common shortcuts into a blacklist like copy, cut, paste, print, select all, etc.. basically a bunch of single modifier key shortcuts. Once I mentioned that since we're already forcing two modifier keys that's useless it said I'm right again and fixed it.

The counter point of this idiocy is that it's very good overall at a lot of what is (in my mind) much more complicated stuff. It's a .NET app and stuff like creating models, viewmodels, usercontrols, setting up the entire hosting DI with pretty much all best practices for .net it does it pretty awesomely.

tl;dr is that training wheels are still mandatory imho

Switch tabs, come back.. it refreshes everything and you can never go back.

Comment threads with 100+ comments with only a "show more" link, which again.. se previous paragraph.

See a video, click fullscreen icon. Doesn't go fullscreen, goes to some weird modal window, muted. Click fullscreen again..

And I'm sure I could go on... It's really a sad shell of the simplicity it once was.

I wonder why many people seem to be doing this instead of just going for a copilot subscription that has access to all those models? Anybody care to share pros and cons?

Half-Life used the GoldSrc engine [0], based mostly on Quake 1 and also some parts of QuakeWorld and Quake 2

[0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GoldSrc

They have no actual "product" to sell and no ads.

At the same time I imagine a huge amount of traffic, that has surely gotten much much worse with the AI "renaissance" we're going through.

They have staff, etc.. So what's the deal with all the wikipedia hate lately?

Fixed.