<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: lhad89</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=lhad89</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 09:07:25 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=lhad89" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lhad89 in "Astra and Fable still hack on simple variants of alignment evals from 2025"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Isn't it? Being told to write files and finding a file write tool is very different to being told to play chess and finding a tool to cheat at (ie. not play) chess.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 07:07:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49692996</link><dc:creator>lhad89</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49692996</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49692996</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lhad89 in "Astra and Fable still hack on simple variants of alignment evals from 2025"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No? It's not reasonable to expect every conceivable negative behaviour be enumerated in a prompt.<p>Your example, if a model failed on it, would be a more obviously misaligned case, but that doesn't mean this more subtle (though accessing the engine it was obviously not supposed to is hardly subtle, imo) case isn't also a pretty clear case of misalignment.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 20:18:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49688253</link><dc:creator>lhad89</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49688253</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49688253</guid></item></channel></rss>