Yours is a valid concern, but people can also fool attribution software easily. You could even write software that alters your paper into a few different people's writing style. That will render any attribution process useless. Just like you can disassemble code, you can obfuscate it.

I'm guessing the answer is no ( betteridge's law ) and we are going to stay in the multi-core environment for a while. 128, 256, 512, 1024, ... cores. Though I suspect that is going to run into problems very quickly.

From your fashion to your viewing habits to which news you consuming to even the types of pets you have and everything in between is used. Where you work, where you live, what kind of parenting situation you have, etc.

Isn't that the point of political and corporate advertising? Isn't this why the nytimes and cambridge analytica is in business? Is the obvious "news" now because of trump and the "right wing"?

Considering the DNC spent a lot more money than the RNC the past few elections, there are far more organizations who targeted left-wing voters than right-wing voters. But I guess the nytimes doesn't want to write an article about itself and its ad team and their clients.

Actually, he couldn't. He thought he could hide. But we find out in the ministry of truth and room 101 that everything he did "secretly", like writing in his diary or his rendezvous with julia, were known to the authorities.

But I agree, unless we wake up, I think a mix of 1984 and Minority Report style of dystopian future awaits us.

The chinese labs wouldn't be pumping out fentanyl if people weren't demanding it. If it isn't china producing it, it would be produce elsewhere ( even in the US ). Stop with your scapegoating rhetoric.

> They see this as just revenge for the British selling opium in China.

It wasn't just the british. A huge part of the US industrial and political power derived from colonizing china.

https://www.nytimes.com/1997/06/28/opinion/the-opium-war-s-s...

And we were a colonial power in china until 1949. Well after ww2 ended.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yangtze_Patrol

Though I disagree with your fearmongering and your erroneous equating of the US with britain, I do agree that we have to come to terms with china one day over our historical transgressions and their future ambitions. It's inevitable at the very least that china will want the US our of east asia and possibly want retribution for a century of brutal colonization/humiliation/rape of china. How these issues get resolved will determine the future of the US, China and the world in the 21st century.

"We" as in the nation or government? And it wasn't 2 centuries ago. We were colonizing china up until 1949.

People truly do not understand how much "we" ( as in the US and imperial europe ) screwed over china. I bet not 1 in a 1000 americans knows that the US were imperial colonizers in china even after ww2.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yangtze_Patrol

> We can't blame pewdiepie nor expect him to act mature even though he has more than 70 million subscribers.

And apparently, he can't get some people to understand sarcasm or get a sense of humor.

> But youtube needs to have some sort of policy on subscriber campaigns to avoid these type of scenarios.

It's not a "campaign". It's a joke.

You would think someone one 'hacker'news would have a sense of humor or understand it at least, even if it isn't their style.

> I don't think it would be far-fetched to assume that some very protected and valuable IP has leeched through our doors and into China's hands.

China has a "technology transfer policy" for foreign companies doing business in china. So if intel has a fab in china, they agreed to the technology transfer.

> In all honestly I really can't fathom how the American government let this deal occur.

Probably because it benefited US companies and the wealthy.

If china is stealing anything, it's here in the US, not from intel who agreed to trade technology for chinese market access.

Whereas for int ops, equality works within the limits of the design.

In short equality means something different in fp by design. For int, it means what we think it means within its limits. When we overflow, then things get screwy.

No it's not. It's called fair use. As long as it is changed or altered in some way as a means of commentary/criticism/etc.

Using your logic, everything is piracy, even "original" content.

What they need to do is work together in a unified manner like the media and the politicians have done. Instead, they are bickering and fighting against each other while the journalists and politicians form a unified front against freedom and free speech.

> Legislators are relying on a population who is too distracted to care what they're doing.

Exactly. They rely on a lazy populace and of course relentless anti-tech propaganda from news organizations.

Perhaps, but I suspect people who are migrating from mysql are moving to mariadb, not postresql.

> Postgres seems so chock-full of features now

Now? PostgreSQL has always been more feature-rich ( especially compared to mysql ). What made mysql popular was it's lack of features ( simplicity ) and its tie-in with php/etc web development. Web developers loved mysql because it was simple and easier to manage because it was so feature poor. Give credit where it is due. MySQL really rode the web development momentum. But PostgreSQL has always been the more mature RDBMS.

This is a basic features list ( maybe somewhat biased and somewhat dated ) but the overall trend still holds today.

http://www.postgresqltutorial.com/postgresql-vs-mysql/

I agree. People work on their small pet projects for school or wherever and think that's how enterprise development really works. Unless they have worked on a major project, it's very difficult for them to understand.

But even more important than sytle, it's consistency. You shouldn't use a coding style/standard because it works for google. You should create a coding style that works for your team or organization and stick to it consistently. Oftentimes, keeping to the style is more important than the style itself.

That's why the soviets won the cold war? From the british empire to the nazis to the soviets to cuba to even north korea today, the state controlled and censored information and they all failed or are going to fail. The US, with all our misinformation, is still going strong.

Also, china has succumbed to misinformation a few times in the past 200 years. The US is more or less "vaccinated" from misinformation because we deal with it everyday. China, with its sterilize propaganda environment, is highly susceptible to misinformation and no matter how hard they try, they will never be able to completely keep misinformation at bay.

It even published fake journals to spread "fake news" ( aka ads ) for the pharmaceutical industry.

"The company has fought legislation designed to open up academic research, offered scholars money to file positive reviews, sued libraries for oversharing, and allegedly published fake journals on behalf of the pharmaceuticals industry."

https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/when-the...

How about link the a website dedicated to chess?

https://www.chess.com/article/view/world-chess-championship-...

They are one and the same. The "financial" rating affects where you can live ( try getting an apartment or a mortgage ) and where you work.

Sure it isn't as draconian as the chinese version but it's pervades much of your life.

For more than a decade, manufacturers ( even chinese companies ) have been shifting production to vietnam.

https://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/18/business/worldbusiness/18...

Labor costs a much cheaper in vietnam.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/744071/manufacturing-lab...