<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: lingeringpine</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=lingeringpine</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:55:42 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=lingeringpine" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lingeringpine in "How we measured AI writing across arXiv, and where the measurement breaks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I am not a native English speaker. This is not surprising to me. I think most of the papers we write would be flagged by AI detectors.<p>It is not because we ask LLM to write us a paper about X. It is because we are bad at writing in a scientific style, and american editors expect us to do it. With LLMs, we can write in basic sentences and tell the LLM the idea and it converts that to nice writing.<p>If you write each paragraph and have an LLM make that paragraph more scientific, it is entirely your paper, but it is flagged as LLM generated. If you have an LLM write the paper but speak good enough English, you can make it look human even though it is not human.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:40:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48982121</link><dc:creator>lingeringpine</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48982121</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48982121</guid></item></channel></rss>