Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9877874

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

  The garbage traffic came from about a hundred thousand
  infected servers, most noticeably, in LeaseWeb B.V.,
  Hetzner Online AG, PlusServer AG, NFOrce Entertainment
  BV, Amazon and Comcast networks. That said, the attack
  was distributed evenly across thousands of hosts and none
  contributed more than 5% of the total volume.

  Fighting back would‘ve been a little easier, if the abuse
  departments in most of the mentioned companies didn’t
  process requests 9-5, Mon-Fri only. (Hours more befitting
  a scuba-diving shop in Vatican.)

Edit: formatting

* plain text edited in vim ;-)

* links (to other wiki pages and content), move cursor over link and will open wiki page, link in browser, image in image viewer, pdf in ... all from your console

* manages todo lists (including status indicator auto update for sublists: [.]->[o]->[O]->[X])

* headers (mostly useful when exporting to html)

* table creation and management

Overall a very lightweight and tightly integrated vim plugin, but gitit looks quite interesting, might give it a try.

Realizing that there is no such system/app I split things out:

* Important Stuff as well as trivia -> CalDav... believe it or not, but CalDav beats most other systems/apps out there, it's accessible on almost any device and you usually have a wide variety of applications to edit your "calendar events", use different calendars for important vs trivia

* Stuff you read on the internet -> obviously (synced) bookmarks (firefox, chrome, opera and others have builtin sync)

* Ideas, plans, drawings -> A5 pen and paper notebook (most people will advocate moleskine, I prefer Leuchtturm notebooks (to each his/her own)

* Research, papers, references -> good old text files, index + txt + pdf + bib (vim + vimwiki + git + some zsh alias like wiki="cd ~/wiki/; git pull; vi index.wiki; git commit -a; git push; cd -")

So far, this works quite well, although I have to admit that while separation is king, it also hinders creativity at times, so I'm slowly starting to integrate other things into the wiki (write firefox bookmark and caldav importer/parser, thinking about scanning/digitizing notebooks...) to be able to cross-reference things. The long term goal is to create a visualization that allows me to visualize (duuuh) all this data in different ways (especially useful for research and connecting the dots).

Hope this helps and I would really be interested how others manage this, especially regarding research, papers etc (Mendeley and others just aren't flexible enough for me...).

Also, instead of using an old rubber tire, I highly recommend building a variable length, tensioning chain, much like this one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrLiSMQGHvY Makes chopping wood so much more fun.

And then, there is also the stikkan: http://www.stikkan.com/ Perfect to hang it up next to your fireplace to do some more fine grained wood chopping, cutting larger pieces into smaller ones.

So my original question still stands, is it unsafe to drink large amounts of water collected from pure air and do they have to take care of that in any way? Or will simply eating salty food fix it? I still have not found an answer in the article.

EDIT: From further below in the thread:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyponatraemia

and its counterpart:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypernatraemia

I wonder how/if they address this?

  I'm waiting for the first system that is equivalent of C++.

Sure, Halide may be seen as just some syntactic sugar (much like quite a few bits and pieces of C++11), but it actually provides you with a different level of abstraction than say OpenCl, MPI or OpenMP where you are very specific about e.g. level of concurrency (which heavily impacts the design of your algorithm) while Halide tries to almost completely separate algorithm and scheduling.

Nonetheless, as much I prefer running FreeBSD on any kind of server system (as I have been for years), after using it on my (fairly new) laptop for a couple months now, I really wish there was better (new and shiny) hardware support (a commonly acknowledged FreeBSD deficiency, so yeah, I knew what I was getting myself into). Given, I only bought it because my old laptop was stolen at work, it belonging to the Haswell family did not really help (no internal WiFi [Intel IWN 7260], no hardware accelerated graphics [HD4400] and so forth...). But hey, who am I to complain, time to get hacking, which I suppose is more in the spirit of the BSD culture anyway and I'm not going back to NIX.

So yeah, glad this book got updated, most likely picking up this new edition...

These days, I prefer to create an interface using the PIMPL idiom [2] completely hiding the underlying implementation, whilst the implementation itself preferably consists of data structures and collections of these (hence 'struct') and some templated functions to modify these. This also resonates with an old C mantra: design data structures first, model functions after their behaviour or something similar [where I just cannot find a quote for].

My main gripe with using 'struct' in favor of 'class' is probably the compatibility problem with other programmers that might become confused as to why you are doing such weird things...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_function

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opaque_pointer

So a genuine question, is the site worth signing up for? I remember when mendeley just started, there was lots of excitement about it, mainly because it was sort of marketed as the last.fm of research (giving you good recommendations for your scientific interests), but then it turned out to be just meeh (getting bought by Elsevier didn't help much ;-).

Also, on a side note, are there any other good sites doing something similar out there (like a reddit/HN for insert your research interests here type of site) that are actually any good? I'm sure there must be a lot of other researchers active on HN...

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6177655

Points: 2

# Comments: 1

If the government tells you, they have a technology that can in principle be used, depending on type and quality of encryption, history shows us that this either means they can decrypt almost everything, or, most likely, not much. Both ways, they are not telling the complete truth at all.

Especially the german government likes to tell us that they have something that can in principle be used for something, like using your issued ID for online activities, a nation wide health-card system, a working toll collect system, etc., the list just goes on and on and on...

Anecdote: I remember, a couple of years ago, sitting in the audience of the yearly Chaos Communication Congress in Berlin in a talk by a pretty popular lawyer specializing in internet laws and regulation (IIRC the title was something like You have the right to stay silent; if you understand german, watch it, it's hilarious), where in the Q&A session somebody jumps up and tells the audience (paraphrased):

...the last time the police raided my home (much laughter from the audience) they took my encrypted disks with them (probably dmcrypt/luks or truecrypt) and after almost one year they still have not been able to decrypt a single bit of it...

I'm pretty sure not much has changed with ciphers becoming even stronger these days. I, at least, sleep well at night, trusting that my PGP2 encrypted mails are safe.

For the longest time I was wondering why my bank would ONLY allow a 5 digit password, alphanumerical only and it MUST contain at least one letter as well as one number, while they let you choose your own username completely free of any restrictions, including special characters. After thinking about it for quite some time, I remembered all these sites where your password had to be as least 6 characters (now 8 seems to be a general minimum).

By forcing users to use EXACTLY 5 characters at least you cannot use the SAME password your already using for your mail and whatnot, except for the fact that there is nothing preventing your from simply dropping the last character (but you sure would NEVER do that, would you ;-), assuming of course you already have letters as well as numbers within the first 5 characters.

While 5 characters seems extremely weak, If you get it wrong 3 times, your account is locked. Locked as in "you have to call them and identify yourself with A LOT OF DETAILS about your account and transactions" to unlock it and reset your password.

I have no idea how they store passwords and it doesn't really matter to me, while it probably should. They are a BANK and if they get hacked and their customer password database gets compromised, I am sure they will have worse problems to take care of.

What I would really like to see is their evaluation of security versus added support work for locked accounts.

One should need to remind oneself of this every single day.

So, any Kiwis around to give some insights?

The keywords here seem to be 'risks ITS astronauts'. With all the money they (rightly) have spend on human safety in an outer space environment they now assume somebody else will do it for them? This confuses me to no end.

So it's like getting test drivers for space vehicles now. Oh my, times sure have changed...