<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: literalAardvark</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=literalAardvark</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 11:50:38 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=literalAardvark" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by literalAardvark in "Linux eliminates the strncpy API after six years of work, 360 patches"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's much easier to use something with all the edge cases already handled as a starting point.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 22:21:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48613543</link><dc:creator>literalAardvark</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48613543</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48613543</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by literalAardvark in "Malware developers added nuclear and biological weapons text to to their spyware"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You could only somehow sell it. If you tried to enrich that you'd get flagged so fast your head would spin.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 05:27:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48513610</link><dc:creator>literalAardvark</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48513610</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48513610</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by literalAardvark in "Malware developers added nuclear and biological weapons text to to their spyware"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This knowledge needs to be published</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 05:24:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48513590</link><dc:creator>literalAardvark</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48513590</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48513590</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by literalAardvark in "Starfish by Peter Watts (1999)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nah, that's different</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 09:56:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48502010</link><dc:creator>literalAardvark</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48502010</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48502010</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by literalAardvark in "Anthropic apologizes for invisible Claude Fable guardrails"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Honestly, while I love having access to this grade of AI, yeah, it's been too dangerous for a few releases now.<p>And Fable is cracked. Way better than anything, and the biggest improvements are on the scariest subjects.<p>So given the state of the world at the moment, and the number of software patches we're barely keeping up with... I'm thankful that they're not making it worse.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 18:12:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48494222</link><dc:creator>literalAardvark</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48494222</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48494222</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by literalAardvark in "Anthropic apologizes for invisible Claude Fable guardrails"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's not entirely bullshit, but they're continuing to be a terrible company with great products.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 17:04:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48493059</link><dc:creator>literalAardvark</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48493059</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48493059</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by literalAardvark in "Starfish by Peter Watts (1999)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Blindsight and Starfish are both awesome.<p>Blindsight in particular will also blow your mind.<p>It'd say Starfish is a great read but it doesn't quite get to mind blowing.<p>They will, however, drain your trust in humanity to deeply negative levels.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 16:57:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48492947</link><dc:creator>literalAardvark</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48492947</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48492947</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by literalAardvark in "Starfish by Peter Watts (1999)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Doubly worth doing as aside from writing some of the best modern hard Sci-Fi half of them are released for free on his page.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 16:56:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48492917</link><dc:creator>literalAardvark</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48492917</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48492917</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by literalAardvark in "Starfish by Peter Watts (1999)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hmm. I don't remember that, maybe it's time for a re-read.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 16:54:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48492891</link><dc:creator>literalAardvark</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48492891</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48492891</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by literalAardvark in "Starfish by Peter Watts (1999)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've read his works, in general all his first books are awesome, the sunflowers series is all awesome, and the rest can get a little hard to read (but I still liked them)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 13:18:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48489965</link><dc:creator>literalAardvark</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48489965</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48489965</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by literalAardvark in "Starfish by Peter Watts (1999)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Chimp is very much not ASI, by design. Humans have ASI but the risk of value drift was too great so they downgraded him to 4.8</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 13:02:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48489786</link><dc:creator>literalAardvark</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48489786</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48489786</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by literalAardvark in "Cybersecurity researchers aren't happy about the guardrails on Anthropic's Fable"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Anthropic seems to me to have consistently been the baddie despite everyone's posturing.<p>Not that I expect better from openai but at least they're not pretending to be good.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 03:20:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48485852</link><dc:creator>literalAardvark</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48485852</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48485852</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by literalAardvark in "AI agent runs amok in Fedora and elsewhere"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nothing really stopping an agent from getting a key</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 03:15:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48485824</link><dc:creator>literalAardvark</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48485824</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48485824</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by literalAardvark in "Building an HTML-first site doubled our users overnight"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There are some advantages, but the main one is probably that it stops everyone from using NoScript and breaking tracking.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 17:59:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48480171</link><dc:creator>literalAardvark</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48480171</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48480171</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by literalAardvark in "Claude Fable 5"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's been obvious for at least 2 years, anyone who doesn't see the writing on the wall simply hasn't learned how to use these well or has severe exponential blindness.<p>"But it doesn't do well when writing my undertrained language" - yeah, fine. Yet. Reasonable code in that is probably one RAG + verification scaffold deployment around Mythos or maybe mythos+1. Just like it was for you learning it, because you knew how to _program_.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 08:36:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48473277</link><dc:creator>literalAardvark</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48473277</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48473277</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by literalAardvark in "Pwnd Blaster: Hacking your PC using your speaker without ever touching it"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The original meaning of hacker</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 19:31:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388737</link><dc:creator>literalAardvark</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388737</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388737</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by literalAardvark in "Gemma 4 12B: A unified, encoder-free multimodal model"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I sincerely wonder why. Chinese censorship is only really relevant if you're doing anti China stuff, which is to say never, while the Western kind of model censorship ( a combination of copyrights and general fairness ) are something everyone's had to work around at least once, even if just for writing an interesting story.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 19:10:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388446</link><dc:creator>literalAardvark</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388446</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48388446</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by literalAardvark in "Gemma 4 12B: A unified, encoder-free multimodal model"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think this plays a part, but the truth is that Google doesn't need to do that, Chinese open models are already doing that by themselves.<p>So perhaps another part is just Google showing that they can indeed play at the big boys table.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 17:24:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386900</link><dc:creator>literalAardvark</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386900</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48386900</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by literalAardvark in "ChatGPT for Google Sheets exfiltrates workbooks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I believe it's likely that you could train an auditor model. Might even be doable in RL.<p>As in real life it wouldn't be any good at doing anything but it'd be able to see fault in others and deny actions.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 05:33:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48352989</link><dc:creator>literalAardvark</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48352989</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48352989</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by literalAardvark in "It takes two neurons to ride a bicycle (2004)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Bicycles are stable. In fact you need zero neurons to run a bicycle, all it needs is "power" and a large enough circle to run in.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 22:34:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341264</link><dc:creator>literalAardvark</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341264</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341264</guid></item></channel></rss>