I don’t see them being one of the top two parties in a couple of decades unless younger generations start actually having resources/assets to conserve

Point to point is just two nodes, but scaling that outward would be very expensive

AC transmission is relatively cheap in comparison

Tweed Valley in NNSW so lots of water and volcanic soil

Edit: turns out the Blue Quandong and the Quandong are very different species - my mistake

It grew 40m in ~10 years and spanned ~200-300m^2

1st through 27th Avenues - they’re over 100 years old now funnily enough

But yes they’re mostly enterprise/services/mainframes not anything overly consumer

In more minor markets like Europe/Australia it seems to be a lot less leetcode and a lot more (1) experience (2) degree (3) actual interview performance

They’re all largely untestable though

String theory, LQG, half a dozen others

If it gets people to pull the trigger on engaging with the firm - it’s likely to embellish how massive the changes are of these patent lapses

It’s company vs user not regression vs efficiency

State and Local little chance they’re not that optimised

You’d very quickly rise to the top of the public sector

My brother in law is only in his mid 20s and is in charge of half a dozen engineers

No nepotism (we honestly know no one) just leaping from the right firm to the public sector at the right time

Look for government consultant jobs or even better straight engineering roles

Is they are the ones who need to be at the bleeding edge of statistics but often aren’t

They absolutely need Bayesian competitive hypothesis testing but are often the least likely to use it

I’m just highlighting inefficiencies and inflexibilities where I see them to start a dialogue

The way it seems to work in practice (here at least) is most partisan/normative legislation goes through the lower house upwards

And bipartisan (or broadly unpopular or highly technical) legislation goes from the upper house down

It’s more complicated than that, but a one way flow committee sounds extremely restrictive for meaningful reform

A small number of pathways is a good thing, one lone process is probably not (you risk over fitting on both sides)

Edit: Australian legislation has a lot of flaws, but this multimodal setup from my experience is not one of them

I was exhausted with keeping up with Android, but was not buying n-number of Lightning cables until they released it on USB-C

But in the 1970s-2000s it was complete black magic and without dedicating years to the craft - you were up to the whims of studios for how much you pay

Compare that today, for instance have a look at the Jazz-Rock Fusion band Vulfpeck’s first album. If you exclude the cost of instruments - they often only need three (rather cheap) mics. Everything else DI. Recorded in a basement for less than a couple grand - with effectively infinite recording time

Live drums are expensive compared to samples, but they’re not the reason an entire genre disappeared