<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: lpsatwork</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=lpsatwork</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 12:07:25 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=lpsatwork" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lpsatwork in "Goodbye POSIX, Hello Tea Room: Inside MinervaOS Architecture"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Whenever an OS intentionally departs from POSIX, I'm curious which compatibility tradeoffs end up paying for themselves long-term. Which POSIX assumptions were responsible for the most architectural complexity, and have there been any surprising regressions from abandoning them? It'd also be interesting to know whether the new abstractions enabled capabilities that simply weren't practical under POSIX.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 16:55:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49072399</link><dc:creator>lpsatwork</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49072399</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49072399</guid></item></channel></rss>