<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: lutanista</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=lutanista</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 08:20:01 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=lutanista" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lutanista in "So you think you could be an electrician?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Obviously.<p>I know 5 people closely that have had long careers in the trades.<p>They are all physically damaged in ways I am not from sitting at a desk.<p>What I notice about the trades is that the conversation from the inside is mostly about retirement because the work is not fun the way I find my white collar work to be fun.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 11:04:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49952799</link><dc:creator>lutanista</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49952799</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49952799</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lutanista in "Religious scholars met with Anthropic"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Just swap out LLMs for spiders.<p>A spider obviously "knows" how to build a spider web.<p>Does a spider "understand" how to build a spider web?<p>From a pragmatic theory of truth, a spider obviously "understands" how to build a spider web. A spider understands how to build a spider web much better than a human.<p>But when it comes to LLMs we start adding all this extra nonsense. As if the spider is blanket "smarter" than me because I can't spin a web. If the spider is "smarter" than me then it must also have this Cartesian theater of the mind like many people think they do.<p>It is layered philosophical misunderstandings to talk about LLMs in this way.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 10:25:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49952528</link><dc:creator>lutanista</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49952528</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49952528</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lutanista in "Show HN: Giving Opus 5.5 a simulated paint canvas"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sougwen Chung has been doing this for years but most people don't care enough about the art world to know this.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 10:44:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49943040</link><dc:creator>lutanista</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49943040</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49943040</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lutanista in "Show HN: Giving Opus 5.5 a simulated paint canvas"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I just don't really agree with the premise.<p>I think Evening Tide, Barge off the Marsh looks really interesting because there is a jaggedness to the edges that is interesting to my taste.<p>What is the reason for a Burroughs cutup? One could argue almost the entire 20th century of art was a reaction against the idea of artistic choice you are referring to.<p>It is very strange to me too because when I actually lived in the 20th century, the idea of algorithmic music composition was considered the outer heights of serious artistic musical expression.<p>I did not expect the generations 25 years later to have an artistic taste that seems to have regressed to a type of pre-impressionism sensibility. The way Monet's critics considered his art a lesser form of wallpaper compared to the "old masters".<p>It is really one of the most disappointing developments because it is not like we have this cultural obsession with some neo-Rembrandt movement.<p>It is the cultural triumph of the art critic who produces nothing beyond critique.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 10:38:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49943002</link><dc:creator>lutanista</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49943002</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49943002</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by lutanista in "Sites in ChatGPT"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It is interesting.<p>I live in the future when it comes to my hobby of music making. I make my own little software tools that I did not have the ability to make 2 years ago. Little tools that are too specialized and specific for my obscure taste to have much wider economic value as tools in themselves.<p>Claude is also the greatest obscure book recommendation engine I have ever found so I have a lot more interesting books to read than in the past.<p>Outside of this, I basically live in 2019 but everything is more expensive.<p>I worry this is the future. It doesn't really feel much different other than things getting more and more expensive.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 10:15:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49942908</link><dc:creator>lutanista</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49942908</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49942908</guid></item></channel></rss>