If only we had effective governments that could regulate industry.

If a nuclear weapon was developed today, would it be down to industry to self regulate?

The visuals didn't show much, and I learnt a lot more from one of the YouTube videos (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCO633KE7RA) posted below.

It's neat that a whole interactive deck can be produced without effort. But it's just not very interesting.

It's literally been designed to gaslight its users in these cases.

We exchange our knowledge, time, and skill for money. If this exchange is no longer viable — because similar value can be accessed via LLM agents — we'll have no way of making money.

I do think some (non-billionaire) people will survive the transition, but the question then becomes: what happens to everyone else?

I suppose, my best guess is that a team will be reduced to one or two people; the those that are left will be judged solely on outcomes.

Two (human) brains are always useful; the benefit of a human in these scenarios is that we can be accountable, and that we have a very real incentive to do well and not be fired. The LLM obviously doesn't care in that regard!

The results will hopefully be a lot more tangible.

People who _can_ see the wood for the trees, and are able to understand multiple (sometimes conflicting) requirements and work out a way through that solves the problems that arise, for all involved parties.

An understanding of domain, the ability to communicate effectively and a mind that can think laterally, will all be vital.

In all cases the first priority of a police officer will be to preserve life.

There's no policy in place that would supercede this.

I'm stick of having to listen to these uniformed arguments. There's no good that comes from holding these views; only division.

The main problem, is that you're trying to intellectualise your prejudice; which is quite frankly dangerous.

You should be ashamed of yourself.

You haven't linked to the specific policy that led to this awful event occurring.

Which specific policy wording enabled this to happen?

No.

I am saying that this one event is being used as ammunition by racist organisations to further their aims.

One officer was filmed on body cam arresting Henry Nowak. I am referring to him.

I am utterly disgusted by the number of frankly racist people using this as a reason to prevent our society being celebrated for its diversity.

It's wrong to use this as an example of why immigration is bad for society.

I find your efforts abhorrent.

> In fact, it is official policy, and the IPCC document leaves no room for interpretation on this.

Which policy led to this tragedy occurring?