I suppose, my best guess is that a team will be reduced to one or two people; the those that are left will be judged solely on outcomes.

Two (human) brains are always useful; the benefit of a human in these scenarios is that we can be accountable, and that we have a very real incentive to do well and not be fired. The LLM obviously doesn't care in that regard!

The results will hopefully be a lot more tangible.

People who _can_ see the wood for the trees, and are able to understand multiple (sometimes conflicting) requirements and work out a way through that solves the problems that arise, for all involved parties.

An understanding of domain, the ability to communicate effectively and a mind that can think laterally, will all be vital.

In all cases the first priority of a police officer will be to preserve life.

There's no policy in place that would supercede this.

I'm stick of having to listen to these uniformed arguments. There's no good that comes from holding these views; only division.

The main problem, is that you're trying to intellectualise your prejudice; which is quite frankly dangerous.

You should be ashamed of yourself.

You haven't linked to the specific policy that led to this awful event occurring.

Which specific policy wording enabled this to happen?

No.

I am saying that this one event is being used as ammunition by racist organisations to further their aims.

One officer was filmed on body cam arresting Henry Nowak. I am referring to him.

I am utterly disgusted by the number of frankly racist people using this as a reason to prevent our society being celebrated for its diversity.

It's wrong to use this as an example of why immigration is bad for society.

I find your efforts abhorrent.

> In fact, it is official policy, and the IPCC document leaves no room for interpretation on this.

Which policy led to this tragedy occurring?

You are incorrect.

There was no policy in place that made the officer behave in this way.

The police officer made a huge mistake. It's as simple as that.

Racist groups are using this ammunition to suggest we need to undo the progress that was put in place to create a fairer more equitable society.

You are furthering their aims.

The behaviour of one officer does not mean that we should no longer live in a diverse society.

This is one incident. The officer is question made a terrible call.

The fact that people like you are using this as ammunition to further frankly racist aims, is an egregious afront to everyone living in the UK.

If we have fewer non-white police officers, our ability to keep the whole of our (gratefully diverse) population safe is at a disadvantage. We need a police force that accurately represents the full range of diversity in our country.

Occasionally members of the police force will f*k up badly. This is a fact.

In the case of Henry Nowak, a police officer made an incredibly bad call and this added to Novak's tragic passing.

The misdemeanor associated with one person does not mean that our diverse society should be made less diverse.

The very fact that people like you are calling for this type of change is ignorant, opportunistic and frankly wrong.

I will not stand for it.

If anything, we should be more careful with our use of language. For instance; 'naturally ocurring' vs. 'human made'.