<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: maglite77</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=maglite77</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 23:57:04 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=maglite77" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by maglite77 in "YouTube is taking down videos on performing nonstandard Windows 11 installs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Does anyone have links to "how-to's" for Linux in the enterprise? Password/MFA management, central app management, the equivalent of group policy, device management, etc.? IME, these are the areas in the enterprise where Windows "wins" with the IT teams, but it's been a long time since I've been close to the rollout side of the house. TIA</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 13:16:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45746450</link><dc:creator>maglite77</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45746450</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45746450</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by maglite77 in "AI Horseless Carriages"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Something I'm surprised this article didn't touch on which is driving many organizations to be conservative in "how much" AI they release for a given product: prompt-jacking and data privacy.<p>I, like many others in the tech world, am working with companies to build out similar features. 99% percent of the time, data protection teams and legal are looking for ways to _remove_ areas where users can supply prompts / define open-ended behavior. Why? Because there is no 100% guarantee that the LLM will not behave in a manner that will undermine your product / leak data / make your product look terrible - and that lack of a guarantee makes both the afore-mentioned offices very, very nervous (coupled with a lack of understanding of the technical aspects involved).<p>The example of reading emails from the article is another type of behavior that usually gets an immediate "nope", as it involves sending customer data to the LLM service - and that requires all kinds of gymnastics to a data protection agreement and GDPR considerations. It may be fine for smaller startups, but the larger companies / enterprises are not down with it for initial delivery of AI features.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 10:30:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43781038</link><dc:creator>maglite77</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43781038</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43781038</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by maglite77 in "Show HN: 1M+ animated GPU sprites in JavaScript"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Just tested on an older (2015) Intel UHD 620 GPU (integrated), and surprisingly all the demos except one hit ~45FPS and up. The first one - Big Forest - struggled to get ~10fps, and was extremely laggy.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 04:59:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42884820</link><dc:creator>maglite77</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42884820</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42884820</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by maglite77 in "Unlink vs. DEL – A deep dive into how it works internally in Redis"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Meh...the phrase "deep dive" has been around forever, not sure what about that phrase specifically gives "AI generated" vibes? For me, I just read through those and focus on the content quality of the article - "verbal seasoning" doesn't phase me at all.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 11:46:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42779086</link><dc:creator>maglite77</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42779086</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42779086</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by maglite77 in "Amazon S3 Adds Put-If-Match (Compare-and-Swap)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Noting that Azure Blob storage supports e-tag / optimistic controls as well (via If-Match conditions)[1], how does this differ? Or is it the same feature?<p>[1]: <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/blobs/concurrency-manage" rel="nofollow">https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/blobs/concur...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 03:45:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42242399</link><dc:creator>maglite77</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42242399</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42242399</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by maglite77 in "Ask HN: Why does Microsoft prohibit employee personal open source projects?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Previous MSFT employee of about 7 years (left about 3 years ago) - this was totally not true. In fact, we were encouraged to make non-competing contributions and I worked with several peers that had very successful open source projects.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 17:07:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41427059</link><dc:creator>maglite77</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41427059</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41427059</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by maglite77 in "German state ditches Microsoft for Linux and LibreOffice"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>While I'll agree the "eye candy updates" may not be there (apart from marketing-driven AI additions and visual updates), there are some big features that aren't visible until you enter the enterprise space. For example, Purview Information Protection [1] and Data Classification integration [2]  make data protection, audits/compliance a no-brainer, and are _extremely_ compelling arguments for an integrated suite at the CISO level.<p>(The downside of course is this is a single-source stack, which can be a risk in of itself)<p>I have no real background in Libre (apart from using it, which I enjoy), but from cursory searches, there doesn't appear to be equivalent features available (very happy to be wrong here FWIW). Are there alternatives in this space?<p>[1]: <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/information-protection" rel="nofollow">https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/information-protec...</a>
[2]: <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/data-classification-overview" rel="nofollow">https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/data-classificatio...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 23:05:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39936922</link><dc:creator>maglite77</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39936922</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39936922</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by maglite77 in "NaN Boxing (2020)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's been ages, but this use of unions reminds me of the VARIANT structure definition from Windows OA/COM:<p>[1]: <a href="https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/oaidl/ns-oaidl-variant?source=recommendations" rel="nofollow">https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/oaidl/ns-...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 21:37:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32872305</link><dc:creator>maglite77</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32872305</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32872305</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by maglite77 in "Web scraping is legal, US appeals court reaffirms"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Always have been. See: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2022 13:05:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31082548</link><dc:creator>maglite77</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31082548</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31082548</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by maglite77 in "Microsoft Azure data deleted because of DNS outage"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Disclosure: Engineer at Microsoft<p>There is an excellent Network Academy video on YouTube [1] that covers some of the internal implementations of the layer-4 load balancers (in the context of HA for NVA's).<p>[1]: <a href="https://youtu.be/oYJBrWcOXfY" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/oYJBrWcOXfY</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2019 02:25:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19060620</link><dc:creator>maglite77</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19060620</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19060620</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by maglite77 in "Fear, trust and JavaScript: When types and functional programming fail"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Many of these concerns seem to not be limited to Javascript at all - especially once you're sending/receiving data between systems. In Python for example, when receiving JSON/XML payloads you have the same defensive parsing layer at the point of entry, but humans can still mess that up and monkey patch a class that breaks assumptions elsewhere without warning. Did I miss something in the larger argument?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2018 13:05:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18315527</link><dc:creator>maglite77</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18315527</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18315527</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by maglite77 in "Why Don't Computer Scientists Learn Math? (2016)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>One area I would argue benefits greatly from this type of formal treatment is the specification of business rules in software. I can be quite insightful to formally spell out requirements from the business, and then apply converse/inverse/etc. analysis to drive out missing cases.<p>Admittedly, most of us can do this in our head quickly (for easy cases), but I find the formal evidence lends itself well to more complex scenarios.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 19:45:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13951675</link><dc:creator>maglite77</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13951675</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13951675</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by maglite77 in "New lower Azure pricing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>[Disclosure: I work for Microsoft]<p>One thing to keep in mind for Azure SQL: you are getting a guaranteed SLA [1], business continuity and full point-in-time backups (up to 30 days) [2] for that price. To compare effectively you would need to price out a comparable Always-On cluster, domain controllers, SAN storage (for replication), and backup solution + storage.<p>[1]: <a href="https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/support/legal/sla/sql-database/v1_1/" rel="nofollow">https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/support/legal/sla/sql-data...</a>
[2]: <a href="https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/sql-database-business-continuity/" rel="nofollow">https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/sql...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2016 20:49:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12631196</link><dc:creator>maglite77</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12631196</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12631196</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by maglite77 in "What We Talk About When We Talk About Distributed Systems"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Also, remember that even building a "simple" web app (comprised of a browser (client), web server, and database) counts as a distributed system. Concerns over event ordering, lack of global time, and data consistency models are all alive and well even within boring LOB systems.<p>To put it another way, distributed system does not necessarily imply a massive research cluster connected via MPI.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2015 02:00:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10708357</link><dc:creator>maglite77</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10708357</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10708357</guid></item></channel></rss>