People get use to it, it goes away, cycle repeats. Nobody remembers exactly unless they had a near death experience.

Writing code is already okay for current open models like GLM, QWEN.

I only need SOTA models for slop reviews, clean-ups and helping me with things I am not good at.

I have been extremelly happy with the results of cheaper models recently.

Composer 2.5 is a beast, fast and cheap. The upcoming Grok will probably be even better, since cursor helped trainning it.

Anthropic will lose market share quickly if they can't do better than this fable shit show...

I think everyone should understand that if they truly want something private, storing it offline or destroying it completely, are the only safer options.

Any sort of convenience to access said data, is a possible surface of attack.

I like having more things to look up to.

We are in the golden age of AI. It will never be like this again.

It's a fucking miserable future for us software people.

Architecting and "good taste" won't be good enough to put food on the table next year...

I found it to be otherwise, but it was not a complete hands off experience. Which is ideal for me, I like to be specific and grok 4.3 and composer are great code monkeys.

Opus and GPT are the models you want right now, for "I have no idea how to build this, so figure it out".

It's not Opus or GPT 5, but that's fine, I don't need the AI to vibecode, I need it to follow my instructions and avoid producing slop.

I think the next models will change everyone's pessimistic minds.

You don't want to sell guns to people without some sort of background check. The amount of exploits found in the last few months have been pretty scary already.

This is just one more layer of caution, because it reveals how little we know how these llms work. They know how to make them, but they seem to be unable to properly restrain them.

No movement, No sun, Stale Air (Unless you have good ventilation). Pretty harmful if we think about it.

Just a bunch of fearmongering

lol no.

This is also how you get a slop codebase that you won’t easily understand.

It becomes a labyrinth that only the Agent knows. It’s not a catastrophe when your making prototypes or projects like you see on X.

But if you are expanding your codebase or trying to build something more professional and maintainable. I find it important to explicitly spec things bit by bit so I can understand and some what keep my writing style in this codebase. But this is only productive when you have a fast model otherwise it kills your chain of thought while you wait for the output.

If the model is slow, delegation is probably the only way.

I trust their judgement to do the right thing.

I don’t understand the overreaction since this is a parallel development.

If it turns out to be better than make it default. Bugs get fixed it’s not like their zig version didn’t have issues before.

Show some love for the layman, we are all laymen in areas we don't know about.

It's a matter of having good taste. But AI education will help.