<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: maniksaraf</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=maniksaraf</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 03:14:07 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=maniksaraf" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by maniksaraf in "We're gonna need a lot more mathematicians"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If we assume that trusting a model to execute an action is an ongoing exercise, since its trustworthiness is often discovered by the user organically as models develop, should trustworthiness be measured at the level of the model, or at the level of the human intent behind triggering it, whether explicitly or implicitly?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 05:52:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49853606</link><dc:creator>maniksaraf</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49853606</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49853606</guid></item></channel></rss>